Cargando…
Outcomes of complex colorectal polyps managed by multi-disciplinary team strategies—a multi-centre observational study
PURPOSE: Team management strategies for complex colorectal polyps are recommended by professional guidelines. Multi-disciplinary meetings are used across the UK with limited information regarding their impact. The aim of this multi-centre observational study was to assess procedures and outcomes of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9898359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36735059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04299-0 |
_version_ | 1784882410608918528 |
---|---|
author | Parker, J. Gupta, S. Shenbagaraj, L. Harborne, P. Ramaraj, R. Karandikar, S. Mottershead, M. Barbour, J. Mohammed, N. Lockett, M. Lyons, A. Vega, R. Torkington, J. Dolwani, S. |
author_facet | Parker, J. Gupta, S. Shenbagaraj, L. Harborne, P. Ramaraj, R. Karandikar, S. Mottershead, M. Barbour, J. Mohammed, N. Lockett, M. Lyons, A. Vega, R. Torkington, J. Dolwani, S. |
author_sort | Parker, J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Team management strategies for complex colorectal polyps are recommended by professional guidelines. Multi-disciplinary meetings are used across the UK with limited information regarding their impact. The aim of this multi-centre observational study was to assess procedures and outcomes of patients managed using these approaches. METHOD: This was a retrospective, observational study of patients managed by six UK sites. Information was collected regarding procedures and outcomes including length of stay, adverse events, readmissions and cancers. RESULTS: Two thousand one hundred ninety-two complex polyps in 2109 patients were analysed with increasing referrals annually. Most presented symptomatically and the mean polyp size was 32.1 mm. Primary interventions included endoscopic therapy (75.6%), conservative management (8.3%), colonic resection (8.1%), trans-anal surgery (6.8%) or combined procedures (1.1%). The number of primary colonic resections decreased over the study period without a reciprocal increase in secondary procedures or recurrence. Secondary procedures were required in 7.8%. The median length of stay for endoscopic procedures was 0 days with 77.5% completed as day cases. Median length of stay was 5 days for colonic resections. Overall adverse event and 30-day readmission rates were 9.0% and 3.3% respectively. Malignancy was identified in 8.8%. Benign polyp recurrence occurred in 13.1% with a median follow up of 30.4 months. Screening detected lesions were more likely to undergo bowel resection. Colonic resection was associated with longer stays, higher adverse events and more cancers on final histology. CONCLUSION: Multi-disciplinary team management of complex polyps is safe and effective. Standardisation of organisation and quality monitoring is needed to continue positive effects on outcomes and services. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00384-022-04299-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9898359 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98983592023-02-05 Outcomes of complex colorectal polyps managed by multi-disciplinary team strategies—a multi-centre observational study Parker, J. Gupta, S. Shenbagaraj, L. Harborne, P. Ramaraj, R. Karandikar, S. Mottershead, M. Barbour, J. Mohammed, N. Lockett, M. Lyons, A. Vega, R. Torkington, J. Dolwani, S. Int J Colorectal Dis Research PURPOSE: Team management strategies for complex colorectal polyps are recommended by professional guidelines. Multi-disciplinary meetings are used across the UK with limited information regarding their impact. The aim of this multi-centre observational study was to assess procedures and outcomes of patients managed using these approaches. METHOD: This was a retrospective, observational study of patients managed by six UK sites. Information was collected regarding procedures and outcomes including length of stay, adverse events, readmissions and cancers. RESULTS: Two thousand one hundred ninety-two complex polyps in 2109 patients were analysed with increasing referrals annually. Most presented symptomatically and the mean polyp size was 32.1 mm. Primary interventions included endoscopic therapy (75.6%), conservative management (8.3%), colonic resection (8.1%), trans-anal surgery (6.8%) or combined procedures (1.1%). The number of primary colonic resections decreased over the study period without a reciprocal increase in secondary procedures or recurrence. Secondary procedures were required in 7.8%. The median length of stay for endoscopic procedures was 0 days with 77.5% completed as day cases. Median length of stay was 5 days for colonic resections. Overall adverse event and 30-day readmission rates were 9.0% and 3.3% respectively. Malignancy was identified in 8.8%. Benign polyp recurrence occurred in 13.1% with a median follow up of 30.4 months. Screening detected lesions were more likely to undergo bowel resection. Colonic resection was associated with longer stays, higher adverse events and more cancers on final histology. CONCLUSION: Multi-disciplinary team management of complex polyps is safe and effective. Standardisation of organisation and quality monitoring is needed to continue positive effects on outcomes and services. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00384-022-04299-0. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-02-03 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9898359/ /pubmed/36735059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04299-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Parker, J. Gupta, S. Shenbagaraj, L. Harborne, P. Ramaraj, R. Karandikar, S. Mottershead, M. Barbour, J. Mohammed, N. Lockett, M. Lyons, A. Vega, R. Torkington, J. Dolwani, S. Outcomes of complex colorectal polyps managed by multi-disciplinary team strategies—a multi-centre observational study |
title | Outcomes of complex colorectal polyps managed by multi-disciplinary team strategies—a multi-centre observational study |
title_full | Outcomes of complex colorectal polyps managed by multi-disciplinary team strategies—a multi-centre observational study |
title_fullStr | Outcomes of complex colorectal polyps managed by multi-disciplinary team strategies—a multi-centre observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes of complex colorectal polyps managed by multi-disciplinary team strategies—a multi-centre observational study |
title_short | Outcomes of complex colorectal polyps managed by multi-disciplinary team strategies—a multi-centre observational study |
title_sort | outcomes of complex colorectal polyps managed by multi-disciplinary team strategies—a multi-centre observational study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9898359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36735059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04299-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkerj outcomesofcomplexcolorectalpolypsmanagedbymultidisciplinaryteamstrategiesamulticentreobservationalstudy AT guptas outcomesofcomplexcolorectalpolypsmanagedbymultidisciplinaryteamstrategiesamulticentreobservationalstudy AT shenbagarajl outcomesofcomplexcolorectalpolypsmanagedbymultidisciplinaryteamstrategiesamulticentreobservationalstudy AT harbornep outcomesofcomplexcolorectalpolypsmanagedbymultidisciplinaryteamstrategiesamulticentreobservationalstudy AT ramarajr outcomesofcomplexcolorectalpolypsmanagedbymultidisciplinaryteamstrategiesamulticentreobservationalstudy AT karandikars outcomesofcomplexcolorectalpolypsmanagedbymultidisciplinaryteamstrategiesamulticentreobservationalstudy AT mottersheadm outcomesofcomplexcolorectalpolypsmanagedbymultidisciplinaryteamstrategiesamulticentreobservationalstudy AT barbourj outcomesofcomplexcolorectalpolypsmanagedbymultidisciplinaryteamstrategiesamulticentreobservationalstudy AT mohammedn outcomesofcomplexcolorectalpolypsmanagedbymultidisciplinaryteamstrategiesamulticentreobservationalstudy AT lockettm outcomesofcomplexcolorectalpolypsmanagedbymultidisciplinaryteamstrategiesamulticentreobservationalstudy AT lyonsa outcomesofcomplexcolorectalpolypsmanagedbymultidisciplinaryteamstrategiesamulticentreobservationalstudy AT vegar outcomesofcomplexcolorectalpolypsmanagedbymultidisciplinaryteamstrategiesamulticentreobservationalstudy AT torkingtonj outcomesofcomplexcolorectalpolypsmanagedbymultidisciplinaryteamstrategiesamulticentreobservationalstudy AT dolwanis outcomesofcomplexcolorectalpolypsmanagedbymultidisciplinaryteamstrategiesamulticentreobservationalstudy |