Cargando…

Outcomes of complex colorectal polyps managed by multi-disciplinary team strategies—a multi-centre observational study

PURPOSE: Team management strategies for complex colorectal polyps are recommended by professional guidelines. Multi-disciplinary meetings are used across the UK with limited information regarding their impact. The aim of this multi-centre observational study was to assess procedures and outcomes of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parker, J., Gupta, S., Shenbagaraj, L., Harborne, P., Ramaraj, R., Karandikar, S., Mottershead, M., Barbour, J., Mohammed, N., Lockett, M., Lyons, A., Vega, R., Torkington, J., Dolwani, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9898359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36735059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04299-0
_version_ 1784882410608918528
author Parker, J.
Gupta, S.
Shenbagaraj, L.
Harborne, P.
Ramaraj, R.
Karandikar, S.
Mottershead, M.
Barbour, J.
Mohammed, N.
Lockett, M.
Lyons, A.
Vega, R.
Torkington, J.
Dolwani, S.
author_facet Parker, J.
Gupta, S.
Shenbagaraj, L.
Harborne, P.
Ramaraj, R.
Karandikar, S.
Mottershead, M.
Barbour, J.
Mohammed, N.
Lockett, M.
Lyons, A.
Vega, R.
Torkington, J.
Dolwani, S.
author_sort Parker, J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Team management strategies for complex colorectal polyps are recommended by professional guidelines. Multi-disciplinary meetings are used across the UK with limited information regarding their impact. The aim of this multi-centre observational study was to assess procedures and outcomes of patients managed using these approaches. METHOD: This was a retrospective, observational study of patients managed by six UK sites. Information was collected regarding procedures and outcomes including length of stay, adverse events, readmissions and cancers. RESULTS: Two thousand one hundred ninety-two complex polyps in 2109 patients were analysed with increasing referrals annually. Most presented symptomatically and the mean polyp size was 32.1 mm. Primary interventions included endoscopic therapy (75.6%), conservative management (8.3%), colonic resection (8.1%), trans-anal surgery (6.8%) or combined procedures (1.1%). The number of primary colonic resections decreased over the study period without a reciprocal increase in secondary procedures or recurrence. Secondary procedures were required in 7.8%. The median length of stay for endoscopic procedures was 0 days with 77.5% completed as day cases. Median length of stay was 5 days for colonic resections. Overall adverse event and 30-day readmission rates were 9.0% and 3.3% respectively. Malignancy was identified in 8.8%. Benign polyp recurrence occurred in 13.1% with a median follow up of 30.4 months. Screening detected lesions were more likely to undergo bowel resection. Colonic resection was associated with longer stays, higher adverse events and more cancers on final histology. CONCLUSION: Multi-disciplinary team management of complex polyps is safe and effective. Standardisation of organisation and quality monitoring is needed to continue positive effects on outcomes and services. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00384-022-04299-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9898359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98983592023-02-05 Outcomes of complex colorectal polyps managed by multi-disciplinary team strategies—a multi-centre observational study Parker, J. Gupta, S. Shenbagaraj, L. Harborne, P. Ramaraj, R. Karandikar, S. Mottershead, M. Barbour, J. Mohammed, N. Lockett, M. Lyons, A. Vega, R. Torkington, J. Dolwani, S. Int J Colorectal Dis Research PURPOSE: Team management strategies for complex colorectal polyps are recommended by professional guidelines. Multi-disciplinary meetings are used across the UK with limited information regarding their impact. The aim of this multi-centre observational study was to assess procedures and outcomes of patients managed using these approaches. METHOD: This was a retrospective, observational study of patients managed by six UK sites. Information was collected regarding procedures and outcomes including length of stay, adverse events, readmissions and cancers. RESULTS: Two thousand one hundred ninety-two complex polyps in 2109 patients were analysed with increasing referrals annually. Most presented symptomatically and the mean polyp size was 32.1 mm. Primary interventions included endoscopic therapy (75.6%), conservative management (8.3%), colonic resection (8.1%), trans-anal surgery (6.8%) or combined procedures (1.1%). The number of primary colonic resections decreased over the study period without a reciprocal increase in secondary procedures or recurrence. Secondary procedures were required in 7.8%. The median length of stay for endoscopic procedures was 0 days with 77.5% completed as day cases. Median length of stay was 5 days for colonic resections. Overall adverse event and 30-day readmission rates were 9.0% and 3.3% respectively. Malignancy was identified in 8.8%. Benign polyp recurrence occurred in 13.1% with a median follow up of 30.4 months. Screening detected lesions were more likely to undergo bowel resection. Colonic resection was associated with longer stays, higher adverse events and more cancers on final histology. CONCLUSION: Multi-disciplinary team management of complex polyps is safe and effective. Standardisation of organisation and quality monitoring is needed to continue positive effects on outcomes and services. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00384-022-04299-0. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-02-03 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9898359/ /pubmed/36735059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04299-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Parker, J.
Gupta, S.
Shenbagaraj, L.
Harborne, P.
Ramaraj, R.
Karandikar, S.
Mottershead, M.
Barbour, J.
Mohammed, N.
Lockett, M.
Lyons, A.
Vega, R.
Torkington, J.
Dolwani, S.
Outcomes of complex colorectal polyps managed by multi-disciplinary team strategies—a multi-centre observational study
title Outcomes of complex colorectal polyps managed by multi-disciplinary team strategies—a multi-centre observational study
title_full Outcomes of complex colorectal polyps managed by multi-disciplinary team strategies—a multi-centre observational study
title_fullStr Outcomes of complex colorectal polyps managed by multi-disciplinary team strategies—a multi-centre observational study
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of complex colorectal polyps managed by multi-disciplinary team strategies—a multi-centre observational study
title_short Outcomes of complex colorectal polyps managed by multi-disciplinary team strategies—a multi-centre observational study
title_sort outcomes of complex colorectal polyps managed by multi-disciplinary team strategies—a multi-centre observational study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9898359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36735059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04299-0
work_keys_str_mv AT parkerj outcomesofcomplexcolorectalpolypsmanagedbymultidisciplinaryteamstrategiesamulticentreobservationalstudy
AT guptas outcomesofcomplexcolorectalpolypsmanagedbymultidisciplinaryteamstrategiesamulticentreobservationalstudy
AT shenbagarajl outcomesofcomplexcolorectalpolypsmanagedbymultidisciplinaryteamstrategiesamulticentreobservationalstudy
AT harbornep outcomesofcomplexcolorectalpolypsmanagedbymultidisciplinaryteamstrategiesamulticentreobservationalstudy
AT ramarajr outcomesofcomplexcolorectalpolypsmanagedbymultidisciplinaryteamstrategiesamulticentreobservationalstudy
AT karandikars outcomesofcomplexcolorectalpolypsmanagedbymultidisciplinaryteamstrategiesamulticentreobservationalstudy
AT mottersheadm outcomesofcomplexcolorectalpolypsmanagedbymultidisciplinaryteamstrategiesamulticentreobservationalstudy
AT barbourj outcomesofcomplexcolorectalpolypsmanagedbymultidisciplinaryteamstrategiesamulticentreobservationalstudy
AT mohammedn outcomesofcomplexcolorectalpolypsmanagedbymultidisciplinaryteamstrategiesamulticentreobservationalstudy
AT lockettm outcomesofcomplexcolorectalpolypsmanagedbymultidisciplinaryteamstrategiesamulticentreobservationalstudy
AT lyonsa outcomesofcomplexcolorectalpolypsmanagedbymultidisciplinaryteamstrategiesamulticentreobservationalstudy
AT vegar outcomesofcomplexcolorectalpolypsmanagedbymultidisciplinaryteamstrategiesamulticentreobservationalstudy
AT torkingtonj outcomesofcomplexcolorectalpolypsmanagedbymultidisciplinaryteamstrategiesamulticentreobservationalstudy
AT dolwanis outcomesofcomplexcolorectalpolypsmanagedbymultidisciplinaryteamstrategiesamulticentreobservationalstudy