Cargando…

Transmitter and receiver of the low frequency horseshoe bat Rhinolophus paradoxolophus are functionally matched for fluttering target detection

Flutter-detecting foragers require specific adaptations of the transmitter and the receiver of their echolocation systems to detect and evaluate flutter information in the echoes of potential prey. These adaptations include Doppler shift compensation (DSC), which keeps the echo frequency from target...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schoeppler, Diana, Kost, Katrin, Schnitzler, Hans-Ulrich, Denzinger, Annette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9898408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36136120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00359-022-01571-0
_version_ 1784882421124038656
author Schoeppler, Diana
Kost, Katrin
Schnitzler, Hans-Ulrich
Denzinger, Annette
author_facet Schoeppler, Diana
Kost, Katrin
Schnitzler, Hans-Ulrich
Denzinger, Annette
author_sort Schoeppler, Diana
collection PubMed
description Flutter-detecting foragers require specific adaptations of the transmitter and the receiver of their echolocation systems to detect and evaluate flutter information in the echoes of potential prey. These adaptations include Doppler shift compensation (DSC), which keeps the echo frequency from targets ahead constant at a reference frequency (f(ref)), and an auditory fovea in the cochlea, which results in foveal areas in the hearing system with many sharply tuned neurons with best frequencies near f(ref). So far, this functional match has been verified only for a very few key species, but is postulated for all flutter-detecting foragers. In this study we determined both, the transmitter and receiver properties within individuals of the Bourret’s horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus paradoxolophus), an allometric outlier in the rhinolophid family. Here we show that the transmitter and receiver are functionally matched in a similar way as postulated for all flutter-detecting foragers. The performance of DSC, measured as the ability to keep the echo frequency constant at f(ref), had a precision similar to that found in other flutter-detecting foragers, and the audiogram showed the characteristic course with a minimum at f(ref). Furthermore, we show for a rhinolophid bat a variation over time of the coupled resting frequency and f(ref). Finally, we discuss the tight match between transmitter and receiver properties, which is guaranteed by the link between the foveal areas of the receiver and the audio–vocal control system for DSC. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00359-022-01571-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9898408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98984082023-02-05 Transmitter and receiver of the low frequency horseshoe bat Rhinolophus paradoxolophus are functionally matched for fluttering target detection Schoeppler, Diana Kost, Katrin Schnitzler, Hans-Ulrich Denzinger, Annette J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol Original Paper Flutter-detecting foragers require specific adaptations of the transmitter and the receiver of their echolocation systems to detect and evaluate flutter information in the echoes of potential prey. These adaptations include Doppler shift compensation (DSC), which keeps the echo frequency from targets ahead constant at a reference frequency (f(ref)), and an auditory fovea in the cochlea, which results in foveal areas in the hearing system with many sharply tuned neurons with best frequencies near f(ref). So far, this functional match has been verified only for a very few key species, but is postulated for all flutter-detecting foragers. In this study we determined both, the transmitter and receiver properties within individuals of the Bourret’s horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus paradoxolophus), an allometric outlier in the rhinolophid family. Here we show that the transmitter and receiver are functionally matched in a similar way as postulated for all flutter-detecting foragers. The performance of DSC, measured as the ability to keep the echo frequency constant at f(ref), had a precision similar to that found in other flutter-detecting foragers, and the audiogram showed the characteristic course with a minimum at f(ref). Furthermore, we show for a rhinolophid bat a variation over time of the coupled resting frequency and f(ref). Finally, we discuss the tight match between transmitter and receiver properties, which is guaranteed by the link between the foveal areas of the receiver and the audio–vocal control system for DSC. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00359-022-01571-0. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-09-22 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9898408/ /pubmed/36136120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00359-022-01571-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Schoeppler, Diana
Kost, Katrin
Schnitzler, Hans-Ulrich
Denzinger, Annette
Transmitter and receiver of the low frequency horseshoe bat Rhinolophus paradoxolophus are functionally matched for fluttering target detection
title Transmitter and receiver of the low frequency horseshoe bat Rhinolophus paradoxolophus are functionally matched for fluttering target detection
title_full Transmitter and receiver of the low frequency horseshoe bat Rhinolophus paradoxolophus are functionally matched for fluttering target detection
title_fullStr Transmitter and receiver of the low frequency horseshoe bat Rhinolophus paradoxolophus are functionally matched for fluttering target detection
title_full_unstemmed Transmitter and receiver of the low frequency horseshoe bat Rhinolophus paradoxolophus are functionally matched for fluttering target detection
title_short Transmitter and receiver of the low frequency horseshoe bat Rhinolophus paradoxolophus are functionally matched for fluttering target detection
title_sort transmitter and receiver of the low frequency horseshoe bat rhinolophus paradoxolophus are functionally matched for fluttering target detection
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9898408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36136120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00359-022-01571-0
work_keys_str_mv AT schoepplerdiana transmitterandreceiverofthelowfrequencyhorseshoebatrhinolophusparadoxolophusarefunctionallymatchedforflutteringtargetdetection
AT kostkatrin transmitterandreceiverofthelowfrequencyhorseshoebatrhinolophusparadoxolophusarefunctionallymatchedforflutteringtargetdetection
AT schnitzlerhansulrich transmitterandreceiverofthelowfrequencyhorseshoebatrhinolophusparadoxolophusarefunctionallymatchedforflutteringtargetdetection
AT denzingerannette transmitterandreceiverofthelowfrequencyhorseshoebatrhinolophusparadoxolophusarefunctionallymatchedforflutteringtargetdetection