Cargando…
Comparison of [(18)F]FIMP, [(11)C]MET, and [(18)F]FDG PET for early-phase assessment of radiotherapy response
Several limitations of [(18)F]FDG have been reported, such as nonspecific uptake of inflammation foci. Moreover, [(11)C]MET has been found to accumulate in normal and inflammatory tissues as well as tumors. To increase specificity to tumor tissues, PET probes with tumor-specific molecular targets ha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9898523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36737550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29166-y |
_version_ | 1784882442916593664 |
---|---|
author | Nozaki, Satoshi Nakatani, Yuka Mawatari, Aya Shibata, Nina Hume, William E. Hayashinaka, Emi Wada, Yasuhiro Doi, Hisashi Watanabe, Yasuyoshi |
author_facet | Nozaki, Satoshi Nakatani, Yuka Mawatari, Aya Shibata, Nina Hume, William E. Hayashinaka, Emi Wada, Yasuhiro Doi, Hisashi Watanabe, Yasuyoshi |
author_sort | Nozaki, Satoshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Several limitations of [(18)F]FDG have been reported, such as nonspecific uptake of inflammation foci. Moreover, [(11)C]MET has been found to accumulate in normal and inflammatory tissues as well as tumors. To increase specificity to tumor tissues, PET probes with tumor-specific molecular targets have been actively developed. [(18)F]FIMP was found to be highly accumulated in LAT1-positive tumors but not in inflamed tissue. The aim of this study was to explore whether [(18)F]FIMP can be used for the early-phase evaluation of radiotherapy accompanied by inflammation, and compare its effectiveness with those of [(11)C]MET and [(18)F]FDG. Tumor uptake of [(18)F]FIMP decreased at day 1 after irradiation, and remained low until day 14. Comparatively, that of [(18)F]FDG initially decreased at day 3 but was transiently elevated at day 7 and then decreased again at day 10. Decreased tumor uptake of [(11)C]MET was observed at day 10. In line with the uptake of [(18)F]FIMP, the ratio of Ki-67 immuno-positive cells in tumor tissues significantly decreased at day 1, 7, and 10 as compared with that in the control. These findings suggest that [(18)F]FIMP may be a PET probe involved in the early detection and prediction of radiotherapy efficacy, although further clarification is needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9898523 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98985232023-02-05 Comparison of [(18)F]FIMP, [(11)C]MET, and [(18)F]FDG PET for early-phase assessment of radiotherapy response Nozaki, Satoshi Nakatani, Yuka Mawatari, Aya Shibata, Nina Hume, William E. Hayashinaka, Emi Wada, Yasuhiro Doi, Hisashi Watanabe, Yasuyoshi Sci Rep Article Several limitations of [(18)F]FDG have been reported, such as nonspecific uptake of inflammation foci. Moreover, [(11)C]MET has been found to accumulate in normal and inflammatory tissues as well as tumors. To increase specificity to tumor tissues, PET probes with tumor-specific molecular targets have been actively developed. [(18)F]FIMP was found to be highly accumulated in LAT1-positive tumors but not in inflamed tissue. The aim of this study was to explore whether [(18)F]FIMP can be used for the early-phase evaluation of radiotherapy accompanied by inflammation, and compare its effectiveness with those of [(11)C]MET and [(18)F]FDG. Tumor uptake of [(18)F]FIMP decreased at day 1 after irradiation, and remained low until day 14. Comparatively, that of [(18)F]FDG initially decreased at day 3 but was transiently elevated at day 7 and then decreased again at day 10. Decreased tumor uptake of [(11)C]MET was observed at day 10. In line with the uptake of [(18)F]FIMP, the ratio of Ki-67 immuno-positive cells in tumor tissues significantly decreased at day 1, 7, and 10 as compared with that in the control. These findings suggest that [(18)F]FIMP may be a PET probe involved in the early detection and prediction of radiotherapy efficacy, although further clarification is needed. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9898523/ /pubmed/36737550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29166-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Nozaki, Satoshi Nakatani, Yuka Mawatari, Aya Shibata, Nina Hume, William E. Hayashinaka, Emi Wada, Yasuhiro Doi, Hisashi Watanabe, Yasuyoshi Comparison of [(18)F]FIMP, [(11)C]MET, and [(18)F]FDG PET for early-phase assessment of radiotherapy response |
title | Comparison of [(18)F]FIMP, [(11)C]MET, and [(18)F]FDG PET for early-phase assessment of radiotherapy response |
title_full | Comparison of [(18)F]FIMP, [(11)C]MET, and [(18)F]FDG PET for early-phase assessment of radiotherapy response |
title_fullStr | Comparison of [(18)F]FIMP, [(11)C]MET, and [(18)F]FDG PET for early-phase assessment of radiotherapy response |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of [(18)F]FIMP, [(11)C]MET, and [(18)F]FDG PET for early-phase assessment of radiotherapy response |
title_short | Comparison of [(18)F]FIMP, [(11)C]MET, and [(18)F]FDG PET for early-phase assessment of radiotherapy response |
title_sort | comparison of [(18)f]fimp, [(11)c]met, and [(18)f]fdg pet for early-phase assessment of radiotherapy response |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9898523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36737550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29166-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nozakisatoshi comparisonof18ffimp11cmetand18ffdgpetforearlyphaseassessmentofradiotherapyresponse AT nakataniyuka comparisonof18ffimp11cmetand18ffdgpetforearlyphaseassessmentofradiotherapyresponse AT mawatariaya comparisonof18ffimp11cmetand18ffdgpetforearlyphaseassessmentofradiotherapyresponse AT shibatanina comparisonof18ffimp11cmetand18ffdgpetforearlyphaseassessmentofradiotherapyresponse AT humewilliame comparisonof18ffimp11cmetand18ffdgpetforearlyphaseassessmentofradiotherapyresponse AT hayashinakaemi comparisonof18ffimp11cmetand18ffdgpetforearlyphaseassessmentofradiotherapyresponse AT wadayasuhiro comparisonof18ffimp11cmetand18ffdgpetforearlyphaseassessmentofradiotherapyresponse AT doihisashi comparisonof18ffimp11cmetand18ffdgpetforearlyphaseassessmentofradiotherapyresponse AT watanabeyasuyoshi comparisonof18ffimp11cmetand18ffdgpetforearlyphaseassessmentofradiotherapyresponse |