Cargando…

Assessment of Cancer Predisposition Syndromes in a National Cohort of Children With a Neoplasm

IMPORTANCE: To improve diagnostics of cancer predisposition syndromes (CPSs) in children with cancer, it is essential to evaluate the effect of CPS gene sequencing among all children with cancer and compare it with genetic testing based on clinical selection. However, a reliable comparison is diffic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bakhuizen, Jette J., Hopman, Saskia M. J., Bosscha, Machteld I., Dommering, Charlotte J., van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Marry M., Hol, Janna A., Kester, Lennart A., Koudijs, Marco J., Langenberg, Karin P. S., Loeffen, Jan L. C., van der Lugt, Jasper, Moll, Annette C., van Noesel, Max M., Smetsers, Stephanie E., de Vos-Kerkhof, Evelien, Merks, Johannes H. M., Kuiper, Roland P., Jongmans, Marjolijn C. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9898819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36735256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.54157
Descripción
Sumario:IMPORTANCE: To improve diagnostics of cancer predisposition syndromes (CPSs) in children with cancer, it is essential to evaluate the effect of CPS gene sequencing among all children with cancer and compare it with genetic testing based on clinical selection. However, a reliable comparison is difficult because recent reports on a phenotype-first approach in large, unselected childhood cancer cohorts are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To describe a national children’s cancer center’s experience in diagnosing CPSs before introducing routine next-generation sequencing. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the National Retinoblastoma Treatment Center (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) and the Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology (Utrecht, Netherlands) and included Dutch pediatric patients with a new diagnosis of neoplasm between June 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. Follow-up was at least 18 months after neoplasm diagnosis. Data analysis was conducted from July 2021 to February 2022. EXPOSURES: As part of routine diagnostics, pediatric oncologists and ophthalmologists checked for characteristics of CPSs and selected children for referral to clinical geneticists and genetic testing. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Detected cancer predisposition syndromes. RESULTS: A total of 824 patients (median [range] age at diagnosis 7.5 [0-18.9] years; 361 girls [44%]) were assessed, including 335 children with a hematological neoplasm (41%) and 489 (59%) with a solid tumor. In 71 of 824 children (8.6%), a CPS was identified, of which most (96%) were identified by a phenotype-driven approach. Down syndrome and neurofibromatosis type 1 were the most common CPSs diagnosed. In 42 of 71 patients (59%), a CPS was identified after these children developed a neoplasm. The specific type of neoplasm was the most frequent indicator for genetic testing, whereas family history played a minor role. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort study of children with a neoplasm, the prevalence of CPSs identified by a phenotype-driven approach was 8.6%. The diagnostic approach for identifying CPSs is currently shifting toward a genotype-first approach. Future studies are needed to determine the diagnostic value, as well as possible disadvantages of CPS gene sequencing among all children with cancer compared with the phenotype-driven approach.