Cargando…

Monkeys do not show sex differences in toy preferences through their individual choices

BACKGROUND: As interest in evaluating sex differences in nonhuman animals grows, the finding that male and female monkeys have toy preferences that differ, and that parallel those documented in human children, has garnered significant attention and is leveraged as an argument in favor of a biologica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pittet, Florent, Heng, Victoria, Atufa, Jala, Bliss-Moreau, Eliza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9898904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36737809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-023-00489-9
_version_ 1784882529972518912
author Pittet, Florent
Heng, Victoria
Atufa, Jala
Bliss-Moreau, Eliza
author_facet Pittet, Florent
Heng, Victoria
Atufa, Jala
Bliss-Moreau, Eliza
author_sort Pittet, Florent
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As interest in evaluating sex differences in nonhuman animals grows, the finding that male and female monkeys have toy preferences that differ, and that parallel those documented in human children, has garnered significant attention and is leveraged as an argument in favor of a biological contribution for human sex differences. To date, however, only two studies have investigated sex differences in monkeys’ toy preferences, both documenting that males prefer toys considered to be “masculine” (such as vehicles) and females prefer toys considered to be “feminine” (such as dolls). Monkeys in these studies were tested in their social groups, making it hard to determine if the sex differences reported reflect actual individual preferences or result from social dynamics present at the time of testing. METHOD: Here, we assessed the preferences of 14 rhesus macaques (N = 7 males; N = 7 females) who were singly tested in a choice test with a variety of toys characterized as masculine (hard non-zoomorphic wheeled toys), feminine (zoomorphic soft toys), neutral (hard non-zoomorphic toys) and ambiguous (zoomorphic or plush vehicles) based on criteria from previous studies. RESULTS: Males and females showed similar preferences for neutral and “masculine” toys and preferred them (i.e., were more likely to interact with them) to “feminine” and sex-ambiguous toys. When they interacted with the toys, both males and females interacted more with neutral than with “masculine” toys. Females, but not males, interacted more with neutral and “masculine” toys than with “feminine” toys. The highest frequency of interaction for any single toy for the male monkeys was with the doll—standing is stark contrast to previous findings. CONCLUSIONS: Our results contrast greatly with the previous study in rhesus monkeys, as well as findings in human children, suggesting that the previously documented sex differences are likely context dependent, and question the existence of a strong biological basis to sex differences in toy preferences. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13293-023-00489-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9898904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98989042023-02-05 Monkeys do not show sex differences in toy preferences through their individual choices Pittet, Florent Heng, Victoria Atufa, Jala Bliss-Moreau, Eliza Biol Sex Differ Research BACKGROUND: As interest in evaluating sex differences in nonhuman animals grows, the finding that male and female monkeys have toy preferences that differ, and that parallel those documented in human children, has garnered significant attention and is leveraged as an argument in favor of a biological contribution for human sex differences. To date, however, only two studies have investigated sex differences in monkeys’ toy preferences, both documenting that males prefer toys considered to be “masculine” (such as vehicles) and females prefer toys considered to be “feminine” (such as dolls). Monkeys in these studies were tested in their social groups, making it hard to determine if the sex differences reported reflect actual individual preferences or result from social dynamics present at the time of testing. METHOD: Here, we assessed the preferences of 14 rhesus macaques (N = 7 males; N = 7 females) who were singly tested in a choice test with a variety of toys characterized as masculine (hard non-zoomorphic wheeled toys), feminine (zoomorphic soft toys), neutral (hard non-zoomorphic toys) and ambiguous (zoomorphic or plush vehicles) based on criteria from previous studies. RESULTS: Males and females showed similar preferences for neutral and “masculine” toys and preferred them (i.e., were more likely to interact with them) to “feminine” and sex-ambiguous toys. When they interacted with the toys, both males and females interacted more with neutral than with “masculine” toys. Females, but not males, interacted more with neutral and “masculine” toys than with “feminine” toys. The highest frequency of interaction for any single toy for the male monkeys was with the doll—standing is stark contrast to previous findings. CONCLUSIONS: Our results contrast greatly with the previous study in rhesus monkeys, as well as findings in human children, suggesting that the previously documented sex differences are likely context dependent, and question the existence of a strong biological basis to sex differences in toy preferences. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13293-023-00489-9. BioMed Central 2023-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9898904/ /pubmed/36737809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-023-00489-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Pittet, Florent
Heng, Victoria
Atufa, Jala
Bliss-Moreau, Eliza
Monkeys do not show sex differences in toy preferences through their individual choices
title Monkeys do not show sex differences in toy preferences through their individual choices
title_full Monkeys do not show sex differences in toy preferences through their individual choices
title_fullStr Monkeys do not show sex differences in toy preferences through their individual choices
title_full_unstemmed Monkeys do not show sex differences in toy preferences through their individual choices
title_short Monkeys do not show sex differences in toy preferences through their individual choices
title_sort monkeys do not show sex differences in toy preferences through their individual choices
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9898904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36737809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13293-023-00489-9
work_keys_str_mv AT pittetflorent monkeysdonotshowsexdifferencesintoypreferencesthroughtheirindividualchoices
AT hengvictoria monkeysdonotshowsexdifferencesintoypreferencesthroughtheirindividualchoices
AT atufajala monkeysdonotshowsexdifferencesintoypreferencesthroughtheirindividualchoices
AT blissmoreaueliza monkeysdonotshowsexdifferencesintoypreferencesthroughtheirindividualchoices