Cargando…

Different femoral tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a finite element analysis

BACKGROUND: At present, there is no consensus on the optimal biomechanical method for Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction, and the “critical corner” that is produced by the femoral tunnel is currently considered to be one of the main reasons for PCL failure. Thus, the purpose of this st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Bing, Ye, Yongjie, Yao, Long, Wei, Ancheng, Huang, Xin, Wang, Zhiqiang, Yu, Xiaojun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9898916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36737713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06161-y
_version_ 1784882532460789760
author Wang, Bing
Ye, Yongjie
Yao, Long
Wei, Ancheng
Huang, Xin
Wang, Zhiqiang
Yu, Xiaojun
author_facet Wang, Bing
Ye, Yongjie
Yao, Long
Wei, Ancheng
Huang, Xin
Wang, Zhiqiang
Yu, Xiaojun
author_sort Wang, Bing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: At present, there is no consensus on the optimal biomechanical method for Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction, and the “critical corner” that is produced by the femoral tunnel is currently considered to be one of the main reasons for PCL failure. Thus, the purpose of this study was to identify one or several different tunnels of the femur, thereby reducing the influence of the "critical corner" without reducing the posterior stability of the knee. METHODS: CT and MRI data of the knee joint of a healthy adult man were collected, and computer-related software was used to reconstruct the finite element model of the knee joint, to provide different properties to different materials and to allow for the performance of a finite element analysis of the reconstructed model. The position of the femoral tunnel was positioned and partitioned according to anatomical posture, and three areas were divided (the antero-proximal region, the antero-distal region and the posterior region). In addition, we applied a posterior tibial load of 134 N to the reconstructed model, recorded and compared different tunnels of the femur, conducted peak stress at the flexion of the knee joint of 0°, 30°, 60° and 90°, and elicited the displacement of the proximal tibia. RESULTS: Among the 20 different femoral tunnels, the graft peak stress was lower in tunnels 4, 12 and 18 than in the PCL anatomical footpath tunnel 13, especially at high flexion angles (60° and 90°). These three tunnels did not increase the posterior displacement of the proximal tibia compared with the anatomical footpath tunnel 13. CONCLUSION: In summary, among the options for PCL reconstruction of the femoral tunnel, the tunnels located 5 mm distal to the footprint and 5 mm anterior to the footprint could reduce the peak stress of the graft; additionally, it may reduce the "critical corner" and was shown to not reduce the posterior stability of the knee joint.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9898916
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98989162023-02-05 Different femoral tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a finite element analysis Wang, Bing Ye, Yongjie Yao, Long Wei, Ancheng Huang, Xin Wang, Zhiqiang Yu, Xiaojun BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: At present, there is no consensus on the optimal biomechanical method for Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction, and the “critical corner” that is produced by the femoral tunnel is currently considered to be one of the main reasons for PCL failure. Thus, the purpose of this study was to identify one or several different tunnels of the femur, thereby reducing the influence of the "critical corner" without reducing the posterior stability of the knee. METHODS: CT and MRI data of the knee joint of a healthy adult man were collected, and computer-related software was used to reconstruct the finite element model of the knee joint, to provide different properties to different materials and to allow for the performance of a finite element analysis of the reconstructed model. The position of the femoral tunnel was positioned and partitioned according to anatomical posture, and three areas were divided (the antero-proximal region, the antero-distal region and the posterior region). In addition, we applied a posterior tibial load of 134 N to the reconstructed model, recorded and compared different tunnels of the femur, conducted peak stress at the flexion of the knee joint of 0°, 30°, 60° and 90°, and elicited the displacement of the proximal tibia. RESULTS: Among the 20 different femoral tunnels, the graft peak stress was lower in tunnels 4, 12 and 18 than in the PCL anatomical footpath tunnel 13, especially at high flexion angles (60° and 90°). These three tunnels did not increase the posterior displacement of the proximal tibia compared with the anatomical footpath tunnel 13. CONCLUSION: In summary, among the options for PCL reconstruction of the femoral tunnel, the tunnels located 5 mm distal to the footprint and 5 mm anterior to the footprint could reduce the peak stress of the graft; additionally, it may reduce the "critical corner" and was shown to not reduce the posterior stability of the knee joint. BioMed Central 2023-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9898916/ /pubmed/36737713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06161-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wang, Bing
Ye, Yongjie
Yao, Long
Wei, Ancheng
Huang, Xin
Wang, Zhiqiang
Yu, Xiaojun
Different femoral tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a finite element analysis
title Different femoral tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a finite element analysis
title_full Different femoral tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a finite element analysis
title_fullStr Different femoral tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a finite element analysis
title_full_unstemmed Different femoral tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a finite element analysis
title_short Different femoral tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a finite element analysis
title_sort different femoral tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a finite element analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9898916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36737713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06161-y
work_keys_str_mv AT wangbing differentfemoraltunnelplacementinposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionafiniteelementanalysis
AT yeyongjie differentfemoraltunnelplacementinposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionafiniteelementanalysis
AT yaolong differentfemoraltunnelplacementinposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionafiniteelementanalysis
AT weiancheng differentfemoraltunnelplacementinposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionafiniteelementanalysis
AT huangxin differentfemoraltunnelplacementinposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionafiniteelementanalysis
AT wangzhiqiang differentfemoraltunnelplacementinposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionafiniteelementanalysis
AT yuxiaojun differentfemoraltunnelplacementinposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionafiniteelementanalysis