Cargando…

Vacuum-assisted closure versus conventional dressing in necrotizing fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Necrotizing fasciitis is a rapid and severe soft tissue infection that targets subcutaneous fat tissue, muscle, and fascia. This study compares the clinical outcomes of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) versus conventional dressing on necrotizing fasciitis. METHODS: We systematically searche...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Rongli, Zhang, Yahui, Hou, Liyuan, Yan, Chengyong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9898985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36737764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03561-7
_version_ 1784882547329597440
author Zhang, Rongli
Zhang, Yahui
Hou, Liyuan
Yan, Chengyong
author_facet Zhang, Rongli
Zhang, Yahui
Hou, Liyuan
Yan, Chengyong
author_sort Zhang, Rongli
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Necrotizing fasciitis is a rapid and severe soft tissue infection that targets subcutaneous fat tissue, muscle, and fascia. This study compares the clinical outcomes of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) versus conventional dressing on necrotizing fasciitis. METHODS: We systematically searched Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed for clinical trials (published between January 1, 1995 and September 30, 2021), which compared VAC with conventional dressing for necrotizing fasciitis. The mortality rate of necrotizing fasciitis was the primary outcome of this study. The number of debridements, the total length of hospital stay, and the complication rate were secondary outcomes. A random effects model assessed all pooled data. RESULTS: A total of 230 identified studies and seven controlled clinical trials met the inclusion criteria and were included in this analysis (n = 249 participants). Compared to the conventional dressing, patients treated with VAC had a significantly lower mortality rate [OR = 0.27, 95% CI (0.09, 0.87)] (P = 0.03). Total length of hospital stays [MD = 8.46, 95% CI (− 0.53, 17.45)] (P = 0.07), number of debridements [MD = 0.86, 95% CI (− 0.58, 2.30)] (P = 0.24), and complication rate [OR = 0.64, 95% CI (0.07, 5.94)] (P = 0.69) were not significant. These results did not show significant differences between both groups treated with VAC or conventional treatment. CONCLUSION: VAC could significantly decrease the death rate compared to conventional dressing. No significant impacts were found on the number of debridements, the total length of hospital stay, and the complication rate in this study. Level of evidence Level-III. Registration Research Registry (reviewregistry1246). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-023-03561-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9898985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98989852023-02-05 Vacuum-assisted closure versus conventional dressing in necrotizing fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zhang, Rongli Zhang, Yahui Hou, Liyuan Yan, Chengyong J Orthop Surg Res Review BACKGROUND: Necrotizing fasciitis is a rapid and severe soft tissue infection that targets subcutaneous fat tissue, muscle, and fascia. This study compares the clinical outcomes of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) versus conventional dressing on necrotizing fasciitis. METHODS: We systematically searched Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed for clinical trials (published between January 1, 1995 and September 30, 2021), which compared VAC with conventional dressing for necrotizing fasciitis. The mortality rate of necrotizing fasciitis was the primary outcome of this study. The number of debridements, the total length of hospital stay, and the complication rate were secondary outcomes. A random effects model assessed all pooled data. RESULTS: A total of 230 identified studies and seven controlled clinical trials met the inclusion criteria and were included in this analysis (n = 249 participants). Compared to the conventional dressing, patients treated with VAC had a significantly lower mortality rate [OR = 0.27, 95% CI (0.09, 0.87)] (P = 0.03). Total length of hospital stays [MD = 8.46, 95% CI (− 0.53, 17.45)] (P = 0.07), number of debridements [MD = 0.86, 95% CI (− 0.58, 2.30)] (P = 0.24), and complication rate [OR = 0.64, 95% CI (0.07, 5.94)] (P = 0.69) were not significant. These results did not show significant differences between both groups treated with VAC or conventional treatment. CONCLUSION: VAC could significantly decrease the death rate compared to conventional dressing. No significant impacts were found on the number of debridements, the total length of hospital stay, and the complication rate in this study. Level of evidence Level-III. Registration Research Registry (reviewregistry1246). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-023-03561-7. BioMed Central 2023-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9898985/ /pubmed/36737764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03561-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Zhang, Rongli
Zhang, Yahui
Hou, Liyuan
Yan, Chengyong
Vacuum-assisted closure versus conventional dressing in necrotizing fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Vacuum-assisted closure versus conventional dressing in necrotizing fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Vacuum-assisted closure versus conventional dressing in necrotizing fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Vacuum-assisted closure versus conventional dressing in necrotizing fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Vacuum-assisted closure versus conventional dressing in necrotizing fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Vacuum-assisted closure versus conventional dressing in necrotizing fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort vacuum-assisted closure versus conventional dressing in necrotizing fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9898985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36737764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03561-7
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangrongli vacuumassistedclosureversusconventionaldressinginnecrotizingfasciitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangyahui vacuumassistedclosureversusconventionaldressinginnecrotizingfasciitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT houliyuan vacuumassistedclosureversusconventionaldressinginnecrotizingfasciitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yanchengyong vacuumassistedclosureversusconventionaldressinginnecrotizingfasciitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis