Cargando…
The High Cost of Death After Acute Myocardial Infarctions: Results from a National US Hospital Database
INTRODUCTION: This study described the differences in costs and length of stay (LOS) among patients with AMI who died versus survived using a large, nationally representative cohort of AMI patients. METHODS: The 2019 HCUP NIS was used to analyze costs, and LOS among all patients with a principal dia...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9899015/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36747496 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S397220 |
Sumario: | INTRODUCTION: This study described the differences in costs and length of stay (LOS) among patients with AMI who died versus survived using a large, nationally representative cohort of AMI patients. METHODS: The 2019 HCUP NIS was used to analyze costs, and LOS among all patients with a principal diagnosis of AMI. A propensity-score matched analysis and multivariable regression were used to adjust for patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: There were 4559 visits in each of the cohorts (total 9118). The adjusted mean hospital cost was $18,970 (95% CI $16,453 - $21,871) for those that survived and $23,173 (95% CI $20,167 - $26,626; p <0.001) for those that died. The LOS was 3.95 (95% CI 3.41–4.57) in survivors and 4.24 (95% CI 3.67–4.89; p <0.001) in those who died. CONCLUSION: Survivors of AMI incurred lower costs and length of stay than those who died. Higher costs were attributed to greater LOS and higher-level care. The results suggest that economic evaluations of cardiovascular interventions that do not include the cost of dying may underestimate the benefits of the intervention. |
---|