Cargando…

Is small for gestational age status independently correlated with body composition during childhood?

This study aims to examine if small for gestation age (SGA) status is correlated with alterations in body composition at prepuberty, independently of other factors, comparing SGA-born children with appropriate for gestational age (AGA)-born children. We examined anthropometrics, waist circumference,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Balomenou, Foteini, Rallis, Dimitrios, Evangelou, Filippos, Zisi, Anna, Balomenou, Kalliopi, Tsekas, Nikolaos, Tzoufi, Meropi, Siomou, Ekaterini, Giapros, Vasileios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9899173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36445515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04723-1
Descripción
Sumario:This study aims to examine if small for gestation age (SGA) status is correlated with alterations in body composition at prepuberty, independently of other factors, comparing SGA-born children with appropriate for gestational age (AGA)-born children. We examined anthropometrics, waist circumference, body mass index (BMI), six skinfold thickness, and body composition using the method of bioelectrical impedance in 636 children aged 7 to 10 years. We also considered age, gender, birth mode, mother’s age, prepregnancy weight, weight gain during pregnancy, social status, parental BMI, type of feeding, and daily exercise. We examined 636 children at a mean age of 9 years: 106 SGA-born and 530 AGA-born children. SGA as compared to AGA-born children had a lower BMI z-score (0.26 ± 0.89 kg/cm(2) vs 0.46 ± 0.84 kg/cm(2), p < 0.050) and a lower lean mass, although that was not statistically significant (24.0 ± 6.6 kg vs 25.6 ± 6.4 kg, p < 0.100). SGA-born children presented no difference in waist circumference or fat mass in comparison to children born AGA. Logistic regression analysis revealed a strong independent negative association between SGA status and BMI (beta =  − 2.33, OR = 0.70 p = 0.019) and SGA status and lean mass (beta =  − 2.43, OR = 0.95 p = 0.010).   Conclusion: Our findings suggest that SGA-born children had a lower BMI as compared to AGA-born subjects, whereas SGA status was negatively associated with BMI and lean mass.