Cargando…
Children’s foot parameters and basic anthropometry — do arch height and midfoot width change?
The aims of this study were as follows: (1) to assess how foot posture and morphology assessments change according to body mass index (BMI) status; (2) to determine which body composition parameter (BMI or waist circumference) correlates better with the foot posture index (FPI), arch height index (A...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9899181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36478295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04715-1 |
_version_ | 1784882586659586048 |
---|---|
author | Escalona-Marfil, Carles Prats-Puig, Anna Ortas-Deunosajut, Xavier Font-Lladó, Raquel Ruiz-Tarrazo, Xavier Evans, Angela Margaret |
author_facet | Escalona-Marfil, Carles Prats-Puig, Anna Ortas-Deunosajut, Xavier Font-Lladó, Raquel Ruiz-Tarrazo, Xavier Evans, Angela Margaret |
author_sort | Escalona-Marfil, Carles |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aims of this study were as follows: (1) to assess how foot posture and morphology assessments change according to body mass index (BMI) status; (2) to determine which body composition parameter (BMI or waist circumference) correlates better with the foot posture index (FPI), arch height index (AHI), and midfoot width (MFW) in children. Foot morphometry (FPI, AHI, and MFW) and body composition (BMI and waist circumference (WC)) were assessed in a cross-sectional study of 575 children (mean age = 7.42 ± 1.67 years; 53.27% female). When comparing BMI groups, an increase of 8.3% in AHI and 13.6% in MFW (both p < 0.0001) was seen. In linear regression analyses, BMI and WC were positively associated with MFW explaining together 64.8% of its variance. Noteworthy, MFW is the most related to body composition parameters. Conclusion: Foot morphology assessed by FPI, AHI, and MFW differs among BMI categories in children. Noteworthy, WC correlates better with foot measures than does the more commonly used BMI, and more importantly the MFW is the foot measure best explained by children’s body weight. Since foot morphometry is different among different BMI groups, children would benefit from shoes with different patterns (thinner and wider), as well as a good system to adjust midfoot height. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9899181 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98991812023-02-06 Children’s foot parameters and basic anthropometry — do arch height and midfoot width change? Escalona-Marfil, Carles Prats-Puig, Anna Ortas-Deunosajut, Xavier Font-Lladó, Raquel Ruiz-Tarrazo, Xavier Evans, Angela Margaret Eur J Pediatr Research The aims of this study were as follows: (1) to assess how foot posture and morphology assessments change according to body mass index (BMI) status; (2) to determine which body composition parameter (BMI or waist circumference) correlates better with the foot posture index (FPI), arch height index (AHI), and midfoot width (MFW) in children. Foot morphometry (FPI, AHI, and MFW) and body composition (BMI and waist circumference (WC)) were assessed in a cross-sectional study of 575 children (mean age = 7.42 ± 1.67 years; 53.27% female). When comparing BMI groups, an increase of 8.3% in AHI and 13.6% in MFW (both p < 0.0001) was seen. In linear regression analyses, BMI and WC were positively associated with MFW explaining together 64.8% of its variance. Noteworthy, MFW is the most related to body composition parameters. Conclusion: Foot morphology assessed by FPI, AHI, and MFW differs among BMI categories in children. Noteworthy, WC correlates better with foot measures than does the more commonly used BMI, and more importantly the MFW is the foot measure best explained by children’s body weight. Since foot morphometry is different among different BMI groups, children would benefit from shoes with different patterns (thinner and wider), as well as a good system to adjust midfoot height. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-12-07 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9899181/ /pubmed/36478295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04715-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Escalona-Marfil, Carles Prats-Puig, Anna Ortas-Deunosajut, Xavier Font-Lladó, Raquel Ruiz-Tarrazo, Xavier Evans, Angela Margaret Children’s foot parameters and basic anthropometry — do arch height and midfoot width change? |
title | Children’s foot parameters and basic anthropometry — do arch height and midfoot width change? |
title_full | Children’s foot parameters and basic anthropometry — do arch height and midfoot width change? |
title_fullStr | Children’s foot parameters and basic anthropometry — do arch height and midfoot width change? |
title_full_unstemmed | Children’s foot parameters and basic anthropometry — do arch height and midfoot width change? |
title_short | Children’s foot parameters and basic anthropometry — do arch height and midfoot width change? |
title_sort | children’s foot parameters and basic anthropometry — do arch height and midfoot width change? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9899181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36478295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04715-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT escalonamarfilcarles childrensfootparametersandbasicanthropometrydoarchheightandmidfootwidthchange AT pratspuiganna childrensfootparametersandbasicanthropometrydoarchheightandmidfootwidthchange AT ortasdeunosajutxavier childrensfootparametersandbasicanthropometrydoarchheightandmidfootwidthchange AT fontlladoraquel childrensfootparametersandbasicanthropometrydoarchheightandmidfootwidthchange AT ruiztarrazoxavier childrensfootparametersandbasicanthropometrydoarchheightandmidfootwidthchange AT evansangelamargaret childrensfootparametersandbasicanthropometrydoarchheightandmidfootwidthchange |