Cargando…
A comparison of the perineal and penoscrotal approaches in artificial urinary sphincter implantation for the control of male stress urinary incontinence
BACKGROUND: The two most common surgical approaches to treat stress urinary incontinence in men are the traditional perineal and the new penoscrotal approach for artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation. Each method carries its own advantages and disadvantages. The few reports that compare th...
Autores principales: | Altaweel, Waleed, Almesned, Razan, Seyam, Raouf |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9899335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36739496 http://dx.doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2023.57 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Penoscrotal Incision for the Primary Implantation of an Artificial Urinary Sphincter: Erratum
Publicado: (2021) -
Artificial urinary sphincters for male stress urinary incontinence: current perspectives
por: Cordon, Billy H, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
The Current Role of the Artificial Urinary Sphincter in Male and Female Urinary Incontinence
por: Islah, MAR, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Targeting Moderate and Severe Male Stress Urinary Incontinence With Adjustable Male Slings and the Perineal Artificial Urinary Sphincter: Focus on Perioperative Complications and Device Explantations
por: Kretschmer, Alexander, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Artificial urinary sphincter implantation with periprostatic cuff placement for urinary incontinence in men
por: Szopiński, Tomasz, et al.
Publicado: (2020)