Cargando…

Disentangling concepts of inappropriate polypharmacy in old age: a scoping review

INTRODUCTION: Polypharmacy is a common concern, especially in the older population. In some countries more that 50% of all individuals over 60 receive five or more drugs, most often due to multimorbidity and increased longevity. However, polypharmacy is associated with multiple adverse events, and m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lau, Sofie Rosenlund, Waldorff, Frans, Holm, Anne, Frølich, Anne, Andersen, John Sahl, Sallerup, Mette, Christensen, Sarah Emilie, Clausen, Stine Søndersted, Due, Tina Drud, Hølmkjær, Pernille
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9899389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36739368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15013-2
_version_ 1784882626703654912
author Lau, Sofie Rosenlund
Waldorff, Frans
Holm, Anne
Frølich, Anne
Andersen, John Sahl
Sallerup, Mette
Christensen, Sarah Emilie
Clausen, Stine Søndersted
Due, Tina Drud
Hølmkjær, Pernille
author_facet Lau, Sofie Rosenlund
Waldorff, Frans
Holm, Anne
Frølich, Anne
Andersen, John Sahl
Sallerup, Mette
Christensen, Sarah Emilie
Clausen, Stine Søndersted
Due, Tina Drud
Hølmkjær, Pernille
author_sort Lau, Sofie Rosenlund
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Polypharmacy is a common concern, especially in the older population. In some countries more that 50% of all individuals over 60 receive five or more drugs, most often due to multimorbidity and increased longevity. However, polypharmacy is associated with multiple adverse events, and more medication may not always be the answer. The terms “appropriate” and “inappropriate” are often used to distinguish between “much” and “too much” medications in relation to polypharmacy in research and practice, but no explicit definition exists to describe what these terms encompass. The aim of this review is to unfold the different understandings of and perspectives on (in)appropriate polypharmacy and suggest a framework for further research and practice. METHOD: A scoping review was conducted using the framework of Arksey and O’Malley and Levac et al. Pubmed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane database, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for references in English, Danish, Norwegian and Swedish using the search string “Polypharmacy” AND “Appropriate” OR “Inappropriate”. Data was extracted on author information, aims and objectives, methodology, study population and setting, country of origin, main findings and implications, and all text including the words “appropriate,” “inappropriate,” and “polypharmacy.” Qualitative meaning condensation analysis was used and data charted using descriptive and thematic analysis. RESULTS: Of 3982 references, a total of 92 references were included in the review. Most references were from 2016-2021, from fields related to medicine or pharmacy, and occurred within primary and secondary healthcare settings. Based on the qualitative analysis, a framework were assembled consisting of Context, three domains (Standardization, Practices and Values & Concerns) and Patient Perspective. CONCLUSION: Inappropriate polypharmacy is a concept loaded by its heterogeneity and the usefulness of a single definition is doubtful. Instead, the framework suggested in this article representing different dimensions of inappropriate polypharmacy may serve as an initial strategy for focusing research and practice on polypharmacy in old age. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-15013-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9899389
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98993892023-02-06 Disentangling concepts of inappropriate polypharmacy in old age: a scoping review Lau, Sofie Rosenlund Waldorff, Frans Holm, Anne Frølich, Anne Andersen, John Sahl Sallerup, Mette Christensen, Sarah Emilie Clausen, Stine Søndersted Due, Tina Drud Hølmkjær, Pernille BMC Public Health Research INTRODUCTION: Polypharmacy is a common concern, especially in the older population. In some countries more that 50% of all individuals over 60 receive five or more drugs, most often due to multimorbidity and increased longevity. However, polypharmacy is associated with multiple adverse events, and more medication may not always be the answer. The terms “appropriate” and “inappropriate” are often used to distinguish between “much” and “too much” medications in relation to polypharmacy in research and practice, but no explicit definition exists to describe what these terms encompass. The aim of this review is to unfold the different understandings of and perspectives on (in)appropriate polypharmacy and suggest a framework for further research and practice. METHOD: A scoping review was conducted using the framework of Arksey and O’Malley and Levac et al. Pubmed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane database, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for references in English, Danish, Norwegian and Swedish using the search string “Polypharmacy” AND “Appropriate” OR “Inappropriate”. Data was extracted on author information, aims and objectives, methodology, study population and setting, country of origin, main findings and implications, and all text including the words “appropriate,” “inappropriate,” and “polypharmacy.” Qualitative meaning condensation analysis was used and data charted using descriptive and thematic analysis. RESULTS: Of 3982 references, a total of 92 references were included in the review. Most references were from 2016-2021, from fields related to medicine or pharmacy, and occurred within primary and secondary healthcare settings. Based on the qualitative analysis, a framework were assembled consisting of Context, three domains (Standardization, Practices and Values & Concerns) and Patient Perspective. CONCLUSION: Inappropriate polypharmacy is a concept loaded by its heterogeneity and the usefulness of a single definition is doubtful. Instead, the framework suggested in this article representing different dimensions of inappropriate polypharmacy may serve as an initial strategy for focusing research and practice on polypharmacy in old age. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-15013-2. BioMed Central 2023-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9899389/ /pubmed/36739368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15013-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lau, Sofie Rosenlund
Waldorff, Frans
Holm, Anne
Frølich, Anne
Andersen, John Sahl
Sallerup, Mette
Christensen, Sarah Emilie
Clausen, Stine Søndersted
Due, Tina Drud
Hølmkjær, Pernille
Disentangling concepts of inappropriate polypharmacy in old age: a scoping review
title Disentangling concepts of inappropriate polypharmacy in old age: a scoping review
title_full Disentangling concepts of inappropriate polypharmacy in old age: a scoping review
title_fullStr Disentangling concepts of inappropriate polypharmacy in old age: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Disentangling concepts of inappropriate polypharmacy in old age: a scoping review
title_short Disentangling concepts of inappropriate polypharmacy in old age: a scoping review
title_sort disentangling concepts of inappropriate polypharmacy in old age: a scoping review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9899389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36739368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15013-2
work_keys_str_mv AT lausofierosenlund disentanglingconceptsofinappropriatepolypharmacyinoldageascopingreview
AT waldorfffrans disentanglingconceptsofinappropriatepolypharmacyinoldageascopingreview
AT holmanne disentanglingconceptsofinappropriatepolypharmacyinoldageascopingreview
AT frølichanne disentanglingconceptsofinappropriatepolypharmacyinoldageascopingreview
AT andersenjohnsahl disentanglingconceptsofinappropriatepolypharmacyinoldageascopingreview
AT sallerupmette disentanglingconceptsofinappropriatepolypharmacyinoldageascopingreview
AT christensensarahemilie disentanglingconceptsofinappropriatepolypharmacyinoldageascopingreview
AT clausenstinesøndersted disentanglingconceptsofinappropriatepolypharmacyinoldageascopingreview
AT duetinadrud disentanglingconceptsofinappropriatepolypharmacyinoldageascopingreview
AT hølmkjærpernille disentanglingconceptsofinappropriatepolypharmacyinoldageascopingreview