Cargando…

Patient perspectives on the need for improved hearing rehabilitation: A qualitative survey study of German cochlear implant users

BACKGROUND: The electrical cochlear implant (eCI) partially restores hearing in individuals affected by profound hearing impairment (HI) or deafness. However, the limited resolution of sound frequency coding with eCIs limits hearing in daily situations such as group conversations. Current research p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hunniford, Victoria, Kühler, Robert, Wolf, Bettina, Keppeler, Daniel, Strenzke, Nicola, Moser, Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9899842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36755736
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1105562
_version_ 1784882720214614016
author Hunniford, Victoria
Kühler, Robert
Wolf, Bettina
Keppeler, Daniel
Strenzke, Nicola
Moser, Tobias
author_facet Hunniford, Victoria
Kühler, Robert
Wolf, Bettina
Keppeler, Daniel
Strenzke, Nicola
Moser, Tobias
author_sort Hunniford, Victoria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The electrical cochlear implant (eCI) partially restores hearing in individuals affected by profound hearing impairment (HI) or deafness. However, the limited resolution of sound frequency coding with eCIs limits hearing in daily situations such as group conversations. Current research promises future improvements in hearing restoration which may involve gene therapy and optical stimulation of the auditory nerve, using optogenetics. Prior to the potential clinical translation of these technologies, it is critical that patients are engaged in order to align future research agendas and technological advancements with their needs. METHODS: Here, we performed a survey study with hearing impaired, using an eCI as a means of hearing rehabilitation. We distributed a questionnaire to 180 adult patients from the University Medical Center Göttingen’s Department of Otolaryngology who were actively using an eCI for 6 months or more during the time of the survey period. Questions revolved around patients needs, and willingness to accept hypothetical risks or drawbacks associated with an optical CI (oCI). RESULTS: Eighty-one participants responded to the questionnaire; 68% were greater than 60 years of age and 26% had bilateral eCIs. Participants expressed a need for improving the performance beyond that experienced with their current eCI. Primarily, they desired improved speech comprehension in background noise, greater ability to appreciate music, and more natural sound impression. They expressed a willingness for engaging with new technologies for improved hearing restoration. Notably, participants were least concerned about hypothetically receiving a gene therapy necessary for the oCI implant; but expressed greater reluctance to hypothetically receiving an implant that had yet to be evaluated in a human clinical trial. CONCLUSION: This work provides a preliminary step in engaging patients in the development of a new technology that has the potential to address the limitations of electrical hearing rehabilitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9899842
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98998422023-02-07 Patient perspectives on the need for improved hearing rehabilitation: A qualitative survey study of German cochlear implant users Hunniford, Victoria Kühler, Robert Wolf, Bettina Keppeler, Daniel Strenzke, Nicola Moser, Tobias Front Neurosci Neuroscience BACKGROUND: The electrical cochlear implant (eCI) partially restores hearing in individuals affected by profound hearing impairment (HI) or deafness. However, the limited resolution of sound frequency coding with eCIs limits hearing in daily situations such as group conversations. Current research promises future improvements in hearing restoration which may involve gene therapy and optical stimulation of the auditory nerve, using optogenetics. Prior to the potential clinical translation of these technologies, it is critical that patients are engaged in order to align future research agendas and technological advancements with their needs. METHODS: Here, we performed a survey study with hearing impaired, using an eCI as a means of hearing rehabilitation. We distributed a questionnaire to 180 adult patients from the University Medical Center Göttingen’s Department of Otolaryngology who were actively using an eCI for 6 months or more during the time of the survey period. Questions revolved around patients needs, and willingness to accept hypothetical risks or drawbacks associated with an optical CI (oCI). RESULTS: Eighty-one participants responded to the questionnaire; 68% were greater than 60 years of age and 26% had bilateral eCIs. Participants expressed a need for improving the performance beyond that experienced with their current eCI. Primarily, they desired improved speech comprehension in background noise, greater ability to appreciate music, and more natural sound impression. They expressed a willingness for engaging with new technologies for improved hearing restoration. Notably, participants were least concerned about hypothetically receiving a gene therapy necessary for the oCI implant; but expressed greater reluctance to hypothetically receiving an implant that had yet to be evaluated in a human clinical trial. CONCLUSION: This work provides a preliminary step in engaging patients in the development of a new technology that has the potential to address the limitations of electrical hearing rehabilitation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9899842/ /pubmed/36755736 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1105562 Text en Copyright © 2023 Hunniford, Kühler, Wolf, Keppeler, Strenzke and Moser. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Hunniford, Victoria
Kühler, Robert
Wolf, Bettina
Keppeler, Daniel
Strenzke, Nicola
Moser, Tobias
Patient perspectives on the need for improved hearing rehabilitation: A qualitative survey study of German cochlear implant users
title Patient perspectives on the need for improved hearing rehabilitation: A qualitative survey study of German cochlear implant users
title_full Patient perspectives on the need for improved hearing rehabilitation: A qualitative survey study of German cochlear implant users
title_fullStr Patient perspectives on the need for improved hearing rehabilitation: A qualitative survey study of German cochlear implant users
title_full_unstemmed Patient perspectives on the need for improved hearing rehabilitation: A qualitative survey study of German cochlear implant users
title_short Patient perspectives on the need for improved hearing rehabilitation: A qualitative survey study of German cochlear implant users
title_sort patient perspectives on the need for improved hearing rehabilitation: a qualitative survey study of german cochlear implant users
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9899842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36755736
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1105562
work_keys_str_mv AT hunnifordvictoria patientperspectivesontheneedforimprovedhearingrehabilitationaqualitativesurveystudyofgermancochlearimplantusers
AT kuhlerrobert patientperspectivesontheneedforimprovedhearingrehabilitationaqualitativesurveystudyofgermancochlearimplantusers
AT wolfbettina patientperspectivesontheneedforimprovedhearingrehabilitationaqualitativesurveystudyofgermancochlearimplantusers
AT keppelerdaniel patientperspectivesontheneedforimprovedhearingrehabilitationaqualitativesurveystudyofgermancochlearimplantusers
AT strenzkenicola patientperspectivesontheneedforimprovedhearingrehabilitationaqualitativesurveystudyofgermancochlearimplantusers
AT mosertobias patientperspectivesontheneedforimprovedhearingrehabilitationaqualitativesurveystudyofgermancochlearimplantusers