Cargando…

Performance of a dual-hormone closed-loop system versus insulin-only closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. A single-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover trial

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of a dual-hormone (DH [insulin and glucagon]) closed-loop system compared to a single-hormone (SH [insulin only]) closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: This was a 26-hour, two-period, randomized, crossover, inpatient study invol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindkvist, Emilie Bundgaard, Laugesen, Christian, Reenberg, Asbjørn Thode, Ritschel, Tobias Kasper Skov, Svensson, Jannet, Jørgensen, John Bagterp, Nørgaard, Kirsten, Ranjan, Ajenthen G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9899880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36755913
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1073388
_version_ 1784882728452227072
author Lindkvist, Emilie Bundgaard
Laugesen, Christian
Reenberg, Asbjørn Thode
Ritschel, Tobias Kasper Skov
Svensson, Jannet
Jørgensen, John Bagterp
Nørgaard, Kirsten
Ranjan, Ajenthen G.
author_facet Lindkvist, Emilie Bundgaard
Laugesen, Christian
Reenberg, Asbjørn Thode
Ritschel, Tobias Kasper Skov
Svensson, Jannet
Jørgensen, John Bagterp
Nørgaard, Kirsten
Ranjan, Ajenthen G.
author_sort Lindkvist, Emilie Bundgaard
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of a dual-hormone (DH [insulin and glucagon]) closed-loop system compared to a single-hormone (SH [insulin only]) closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: This was a 26-hour, two-period, randomized, crossover, inpatient study involving 11 adolescents with type 1 diabetes (nine males [82%], mean ± SD age 14.8 ± 1.4 years, diabetes duration 5.7 ± 2.3 years). Except for the treatment configuration of the DiaCon Artificial Pancreas: DH or SH, experimental visits were identical consisting of: an overnight stay (10:00 pm until 7:30 am), several meals/snacks, and a 45-minute bout of moderate intensity continuous exercise. The primary endpoint was percentage of time spent with sensor glucose values below range (TBR [<3.9 mmol/L]) during closed-loop control over the 26-h period (5:00 pm, day 1 to 7:00 pm, day 2). RESULTS: Overall, there were no differences between DH and SH for the following glycemic outcomes (median [IQR]): TBR 1.6 [0.0, 2.4] vs. 1.28 [0.16, 3.19]%, p=1.00; time in range (TIR [3.9-10.0 mmol/L]) 68.4 [48.7, 76.8] vs. 75.7 [69.8, 87.1]%, p=0.08; and time above range (TAR [>10.0 mmol/L]) 28.1 [18.1, 49.8] vs. 23.3 [12.3, 27.2]%, p=0.10. Mean ( ± SD) glucose was higher during DH than SH (8.7 ( ± 3.2) vs. 8.1 ( ± 3.0) mmol/L, p<0.001) but coefficient of variation was similar (34.8 ( ± 6.8) vs. 37.3 ( ± 8.6)%, p=0.20). The average amount of rescue carbohydrates was similar between DH and SH (6.8 ( ± 12.3) vs. 9.5 ( ± 15.4) grams/participant/visit, p=0.78). Overnight, TIR was higher, TAR was lower during the SH visit compared to DH. During and after exercise (4:30 pm until 7 pm) the SH configuration produced higher TIR, but similar TAR and TBR compared to the DH configuration. CONCLUSIONS: DH and SH performed similarly in adolescents with type 1 diabetes during a 26-hour inpatient monitoring period involving several metabolic challenges including feeding and exercise. However, during the night and around exercise, the SH configuration outperformed DH.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9899880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98998802023-02-07 Performance of a dual-hormone closed-loop system versus insulin-only closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. A single-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover trial Lindkvist, Emilie Bundgaard Laugesen, Christian Reenberg, Asbjørn Thode Ritschel, Tobias Kasper Skov Svensson, Jannet Jørgensen, John Bagterp Nørgaard, Kirsten Ranjan, Ajenthen G. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of a dual-hormone (DH [insulin and glucagon]) closed-loop system compared to a single-hormone (SH [insulin only]) closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: This was a 26-hour, two-period, randomized, crossover, inpatient study involving 11 adolescents with type 1 diabetes (nine males [82%], mean ± SD age 14.8 ± 1.4 years, diabetes duration 5.7 ± 2.3 years). Except for the treatment configuration of the DiaCon Artificial Pancreas: DH or SH, experimental visits were identical consisting of: an overnight stay (10:00 pm until 7:30 am), several meals/snacks, and a 45-minute bout of moderate intensity continuous exercise. The primary endpoint was percentage of time spent with sensor glucose values below range (TBR [<3.9 mmol/L]) during closed-loop control over the 26-h period (5:00 pm, day 1 to 7:00 pm, day 2). RESULTS: Overall, there were no differences between DH and SH for the following glycemic outcomes (median [IQR]): TBR 1.6 [0.0, 2.4] vs. 1.28 [0.16, 3.19]%, p=1.00; time in range (TIR [3.9-10.0 mmol/L]) 68.4 [48.7, 76.8] vs. 75.7 [69.8, 87.1]%, p=0.08; and time above range (TAR [>10.0 mmol/L]) 28.1 [18.1, 49.8] vs. 23.3 [12.3, 27.2]%, p=0.10. Mean ( ± SD) glucose was higher during DH than SH (8.7 ( ± 3.2) vs. 8.1 ( ± 3.0) mmol/L, p<0.001) but coefficient of variation was similar (34.8 ( ± 6.8) vs. 37.3 ( ± 8.6)%, p=0.20). The average amount of rescue carbohydrates was similar between DH and SH (6.8 ( ± 12.3) vs. 9.5 ( ± 15.4) grams/participant/visit, p=0.78). Overnight, TIR was higher, TAR was lower during the SH visit compared to DH. During and after exercise (4:30 pm until 7 pm) the SH configuration produced higher TIR, but similar TAR and TBR compared to the DH configuration. CONCLUSIONS: DH and SH performed similarly in adolescents with type 1 diabetes during a 26-hour inpatient monitoring period involving several metabolic challenges including feeding and exercise. However, during the night and around exercise, the SH configuration outperformed DH. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9899880/ /pubmed/36755913 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1073388 Text en Copyright © 2023 Lindkvist, Laugesen, Reenberg, Ritschel, Svensson, Jørgensen, Nørgaard and Ranjan https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Lindkvist, Emilie Bundgaard
Laugesen, Christian
Reenberg, Asbjørn Thode
Ritschel, Tobias Kasper Skov
Svensson, Jannet
Jørgensen, John Bagterp
Nørgaard, Kirsten
Ranjan, Ajenthen G.
Performance of a dual-hormone closed-loop system versus insulin-only closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. A single-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover trial
title Performance of a dual-hormone closed-loop system versus insulin-only closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. A single-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover trial
title_full Performance of a dual-hormone closed-loop system versus insulin-only closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. A single-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover trial
title_fullStr Performance of a dual-hormone closed-loop system versus insulin-only closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. A single-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover trial
title_full_unstemmed Performance of a dual-hormone closed-loop system versus insulin-only closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. A single-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover trial
title_short Performance of a dual-hormone closed-loop system versus insulin-only closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. A single-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover trial
title_sort performance of a dual-hormone closed-loop system versus insulin-only closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. a single-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover trial
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9899880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36755913
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1073388
work_keys_str_mv AT lindkvistemiliebundgaard performanceofadualhormoneclosedloopsystemversusinsulinonlyclosedloopsysteminadolescentswithtype1diabetesasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial
AT laugesenchristian performanceofadualhormoneclosedloopsystemversusinsulinonlyclosedloopsysteminadolescentswithtype1diabetesasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial
AT reenbergasbjørnthode performanceofadualhormoneclosedloopsystemversusinsulinonlyclosedloopsysteminadolescentswithtype1diabetesasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial
AT ritscheltobiaskasperskov performanceofadualhormoneclosedloopsystemversusinsulinonlyclosedloopsysteminadolescentswithtype1diabetesasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial
AT svenssonjannet performanceofadualhormoneclosedloopsystemversusinsulinonlyclosedloopsysteminadolescentswithtype1diabetesasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial
AT jørgensenjohnbagterp performanceofadualhormoneclosedloopsystemversusinsulinonlyclosedloopsysteminadolescentswithtype1diabetesasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial
AT nørgaardkirsten performanceofadualhormoneclosedloopsystemversusinsulinonlyclosedloopsysteminadolescentswithtype1diabetesasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial
AT ranjanajentheng performanceofadualhormoneclosedloopsystemversusinsulinonlyclosedloopsysteminadolescentswithtype1diabetesasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial