Cargando…
Performance of a dual-hormone closed-loop system versus insulin-only closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. A single-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover trial
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of a dual-hormone (DH [insulin and glucagon]) closed-loop system compared to a single-hormone (SH [insulin only]) closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: This was a 26-hour, two-period, randomized, crossover, inpatient study invol...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9899880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36755913 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1073388 |
_version_ | 1784882728452227072 |
---|---|
author | Lindkvist, Emilie Bundgaard Laugesen, Christian Reenberg, Asbjørn Thode Ritschel, Tobias Kasper Skov Svensson, Jannet Jørgensen, John Bagterp Nørgaard, Kirsten Ranjan, Ajenthen G. |
author_facet | Lindkvist, Emilie Bundgaard Laugesen, Christian Reenberg, Asbjørn Thode Ritschel, Tobias Kasper Skov Svensson, Jannet Jørgensen, John Bagterp Nørgaard, Kirsten Ranjan, Ajenthen G. |
author_sort | Lindkvist, Emilie Bundgaard |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of a dual-hormone (DH [insulin and glucagon]) closed-loop system compared to a single-hormone (SH [insulin only]) closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: This was a 26-hour, two-period, randomized, crossover, inpatient study involving 11 adolescents with type 1 diabetes (nine males [82%], mean ± SD age 14.8 ± 1.4 years, diabetes duration 5.7 ± 2.3 years). Except for the treatment configuration of the DiaCon Artificial Pancreas: DH or SH, experimental visits were identical consisting of: an overnight stay (10:00 pm until 7:30 am), several meals/snacks, and a 45-minute bout of moderate intensity continuous exercise. The primary endpoint was percentage of time spent with sensor glucose values below range (TBR [<3.9 mmol/L]) during closed-loop control over the 26-h period (5:00 pm, day 1 to 7:00 pm, day 2). RESULTS: Overall, there were no differences between DH and SH for the following glycemic outcomes (median [IQR]): TBR 1.6 [0.0, 2.4] vs. 1.28 [0.16, 3.19]%, p=1.00; time in range (TIR [3.9-10.0 mmol/L]) 68.4 [48.7, 76.8] vs. 75.7 [69.8, 87.1]%, p=0.08; and time above range (TAR [>10.0 mmol/L]) 28.1 [18.1, 49.8] vs. 23.3 [12.3, 27.2]%, p=0.10. Mean ( ± SD) glucose was higher during DH than SH (8.7 ( ± 3.2) vs. 8.1 ( ± 3.0) mmol/L, p<0.001) but coefficient of variation was similar (34.8 ( ± 6.8) vs. 37.3 ( ± 8.6)%, p=0.20). The average amount of rescue carbohydrates was similar between DH and SH (6.8 ( ± 12.3) vs. 9.5 ( ± 15.4) grams/participant/visit, p=0.78). Overnight, TIR was higher, TAR was lower during the SH visit compared to DH. During and after exercise (4:30 pm until 7 pm) the SH configuration produced higher TIR, but similar TAR and TBR compared to the DH configuration. CONCLUSIONS: DH and SH performed similarly in adolescents with type 1 diabetes during a 26-hour inpatient monitoring period involving several metabolic challenges including feeding and exercise. However, during the night and around exercise, the SH configuration outperformed DH. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9899880 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98998802023-02-07 Performance of a dual-hormone closed-loop system versus insulin-only closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. A single-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover trial Lindkvist, Emilie Bundgaard Laugesen, Christian Reenberg, Asbjørn Thode Ritschel, Tobias Kasper Skov Svensson, Jannet Jørgensen, John Bagterp Nørgaard, Kirsten Ranjan, Ajenthen G. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of a dual-hormone (DH [insulin and glucagon]) closed-loop system compared to a single-hormone (SH [insulin only]) closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: This was a 26-hour, two-period, randomized, crossover, inpatient study involving 11 adolescents with type 1 diabetes (nine males [82%], mean ± SD age 14.8 ± 1.4 years, diabetes duration 5.7 ± 2.3 years). Except for the treatment configuration of the DiaCon Artificial Pancreas: DH or SH, experimental visits were identical consisting of: an overnight stay (10:00 pm until 7:30 am), several meals/snacks, and a 45-minute bout of moderate intensity continuous exercise. The primary endpoint was percentage of time spent with sensor glucose values below range (TBR [<3.9 mmol/L]) during closed-loop control over the 26-h period (5:00 pm, day 1 to 7:00 pm, day 2). RESULTS: Overall, there were no differences between DH and SH for the following glycemic outcomes (median [IQR]): TBR 1.6 [0.0, 2.4] vs. 1.28 [0.16, 3.19]%, p=1.00; time in range (TIR [3.9-10.0 mmol/L]) 68.4 [48.7, 76.8] vs. 75.7 [69.8, 87.1]%, p=0.08; and time above range (TAR [>10.0 mmol/L]) 28.1 [18.1, 49.8] vs. 23.3 [12.3, 27.2]%, p=0.10. Mean ( ± SD) glucose was higher during DH than SH (8.7 ( ± 3.2) vs. 8.1 ( ± 3.0) mmol/L, p<0.001) but coefficient of variation was similar (34.8 ( ± 6.8) vs. 37.3 ( ± 8.6)%, p=0.20). The average amount of rescue carbohydrates was similar between DH and SH (6.8 ( ± 12.3) vs. 9.5 ( ± 15.4) grams/participant/visit, p=0.78). Overnight, TIR was higher, TAR was lower during the SH visit compared to DH. During and after exercise (4:30 pm until 7 pm) the SH configuration produced higher TIR, but similar TAR and TBR compared to the DH configuration. CONCLUSIONS: DH and SH performed similarly in adolescents with type 1 diabetes during a 26-hour inpatient monitoring period involving several metabolic challenges including feeding and exercise. However, during the night and around exercise, the SH configuration outperformed DH. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9899880/ /pubmed/36755913 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1073388 Text en Copyright © 2023 Lindkvist, Laugesen, Reenberg, Ritschel, Svensson, Jørgensen, Nørgaard and Ranjan https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Endocrinology Lindkvist, Emilie Bundgaard Laugesen, Christian Reenberg, Asbjørn Thode Ritschel, Tobias Kasper Skov Svensson, Jannet Jørgensen, John Bagterp Nørgaard, Kirsten Ranjan, Ajenthen G. Performance of a dual-hormone closed-loop system versus insulin-only closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. A single-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover trial |
title | Performance of a dual-hormone closed-loop system versus insulin-only closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. A single-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover trial |
title_full | Performance of a dual-hormone closed-loop system versus insulin-only closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. A single-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover trial |
title_fullStr | Performance of a dual-hormone closed-loop system versus insulin-only closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. A single-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of a dual-hormone closed-loop system versus insulin-only closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. A single-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover trial |
title_short | Performance of a dual-hormone closed-loop system versus insulin-only closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. A single-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover trial |
title_sort | performance of a dual-hormone closed-loop system versus insulin-only closed-loop system in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. a single-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover trial |
topic | Endocrinology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9899880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36755913 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1073388 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lindkvistemiliebundgaard performanceofadualhormoneclosedloopsystemversusinsulinonlyclosedloopsysteminadolescentswithtype1diabetesasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial AT laugesenchristian performanceofadualhormoneclosedloopsystemversusinsulinonlyclosedloopsysteminadolescentswithtype1diabetesasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial AT reenbergasbjørnthode performanceofadualhormoneclosedloopsystemversusinsulinonlyclosedloopsysteminadolescentswithtype1diabetesasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial AT ritscheltobiaskasperskov performanceofadualhormoneclosedloopsystemversusinsulinonlyclosedloopsysteminadolescentswithtype1diabetesasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial AT svenssonjannet performanceofadualhormoneclosedloopsystemversusinsulinonlyclosedloopsysteminadolescentswithtype1diabetesasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial AT jørgensenjohnbagterp performanceofadualhormoneclosedloopsystemversusinsulinonlyclosedloopsysteminadolescentswithtype1diabetesasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial AT nørgaardkirsten performanceofadualhormoneclosedloopsystemversusinsulinonlyclosedloopsysteminadolescentswithtype1diabetesasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial AT ranjanajentheng performanceofadualhormoneclosedloopsystemversusinsulinonlyclosedloopsysteminadolescentswithtype1diabetesasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledcrossovertrial |