Cargando…
How are regulatory oversight organisations using long-term care performance indicators: a qualitative descriptive study in 10 high-income countries
OBJECTIVES: Regulatory oversight organisations play an important role in quality stewardship in long-term care (LTC) facilities. Performance indicators are a key tool for any quality-related work. Our aim was to better understand how and what performance indicators are used by regulatory oversight o...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9900052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36737078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067495 |
_version_ | 1784882760536555520 |
---|---|
author | Poldrugovac, Mircha Pot, Anne Margriet Klazinga, Niek Kringos, Dionne |
author_facet | Poldrugovac, Mircha Pot, Anne Margriet Klazinga, Niek Kringos, Dionne |
author_sort | Poldrugovac, Mircha |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Regulatory oversight organisations play an important role in quality stewardship in long-term care (LTC) facilities. Performance indicators are a key tool for any quality-related work. Our aim was to better understand how and what performance indicators are used by regulatory oversight organisations for long-term care facilities oversight and which features are affecting their fitness for use. DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We explored the use of LTC facility performance indicators by 10 regulatory oversight organisations from England, Ireland, Malta, New Zealand, Norway, Scotland, Singapore, Slovenia, Sweden and the Netherlands. We collected information by means of a questionnaire, 13 follow-up interviews with 20 experts from these organisations and document review. RESULTS: Performance indicators are used by participating oversight organisations to choose priority topics for audits, prioritise facilities to be audited and to identify areas within an audited facility, that require more attention. The indicators of most interest to oversight organisations are related to the dimensions of care articulated in the preset requirements on which audits are based. When the purpose of using indicators is to design a risk assessment model, the fitness for use of indicators ultimately depends on their ability to predict non-compliances on subsequent audits. When indicators are used directly by auditors, the ease of access, clear guidance to evaluate the data and the provision of contextual information are used by oversight organisations to increase fitness for use. CONCLUSIONS: Oversight organisations do not use LTC facility performance indicators to assess quality, but rather to assess the risk of lower quality or of non-compliance with requirements. This risk-related purpose has to be considered when the indicators used in oversight are chosen and when other aspects of fitness for use, such as data analysis and displaying findings, are developed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9900052 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99000522023-02-07 How are regulatory oversight organisations using long-term care performance indicators: a qualitative descriptive study in 10 high-income countries Poldrugovac, Mircha Pot, Anne Margriet Klazinga, Niek Kringos, Dionne BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: Regulatory oversight organisations play an important role in quality stewardship in long-term care (LTC) facilities. Performance indicators are a key tool for any quality-related work. Our aim was to better understand how and what performance indicators are used by regulatory oversight organisations for long-term care facilities oversight and which features are affecting their fitness for use. DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We explored the use of LTC facility performance indicators by 10 regulatory oversight organisations from England, Ireland, Malta, New Zealand, Norway, Scotland, Singapore, Slovenia, Sweden and the Netherlands. We collected information by means of a questionnaire, 13 follow-up interviews with 20 experts from these organisations and document review. RESULTS: Performance indicators are used by participating oversight organisations to choose priority topics for audits, prioritise facilities to be audited and to identify areas within an audited facility, that require more attention. The indicators of most interest to oversight organisations are related to the dimensions of care articulated in the preset requirements on which audits are based. When the purpose of using indicators is to design a risk assessment model, the fitness for use of indicators ultimately depends on their ability to predict non-compliances on subsequent audits. When indicators are used directly by auditors, the ease of access, clear guidance to evaluate the data and the provision of contextual information are used by oversight organisations to increase fitness for use. CONCLUSIONS: Oversight organisations do not use LTC facility performance indicators to assess quality, but rather to assess the risk of lower quality or of non-compliance with requirements. This risk-related purpose has to be considered when the indicators used in oversight are chosen and when other aspects of fitness for use, such as data analysis and displaying findings, are developed. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9900052/ /pubmed/36737078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067495 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Poldrugovac, Mircha Pot, Anne Margriet Klazinga, Niek Kringos, Dionne How are regulatory oversight organisations using long-term care performance indicators: a qualitative descriptive study in 10 high-income countries |
title | How are regulatory oversight organisations using long-term care performance indicators: a qualitative descriptive study in 10 high-income countries |
title_full | How are regulatory oversight organisations using long-term care performance indicators: a qualitative descriptive study in 10 high-income countries |
title_fullStr | How are regulatory oversight organisations using long-term care performance indicators: a qualitative descriptive study in 10 high-income countries |
title_full_unstemmed | How are regulatory oversight organisations using long-term care performance indicators: a qualitative descriptive study in 10 high-income countries |
title_short | How are regulatory oversight organisations using long-term care performance indicators: a qualitative descriptive study in 10 high-income countries |
title_sort | how are regulatory oversight organisations using long-term care performance indicators: a qualitative descriptive study in 10 high-income countries |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9900052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36737078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067495 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT poldrugovacmircha howareregulatoryoversightorganisationsusinglongtermcareperformanceindicatorsaqualitativedescriptivestudyin10highincomecountries AT potannemargriet howareregulatoryoversightorganisationsusinglongtermcareperformanceindicatorsaqualitativedescriptivestudyin10highincomecountries AT klazinganiek howareregulatoryoversightorganisationsusinglongtermcareperformanceindicatorsaqualitativedescriptivestudyin10highincomecountries AT kringosdionne howareregulatoryoversightorganisationsusinglongtermcareperformanceindicatorsaqualitativedescriptivestudyin10highincomecountries |