Cargando…

Hair regrowth treatment efficacy and resistance in androgenetic alopecia: A systematic review and continuous Bayesian network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) affects almost half the population, and several treatments intending to regenerate a normal scalp hair phenotype are used. This is the first study comparing treatment efficacy response and resistance using standardized continuous outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To system...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feldman, Peter R., Gentile, Pietro, Piwko, Charles, Motswaledi, Hendrik M., Gorun, Samantha, Pesachov, Jacob, Markel, Michael, Silver, Maxwell I., Brenkel, Megan, Feldman, Oriel J., Kamen, Corey L., Uleryk, Elizabeth, Guevara-Aguirre, Jaime, Fiebig, Klaus M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9900126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36755885
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.998623
_version_ 1784882778922287104
author Feldman, Peter R.
Gentile, Pietro
Piwko, Charles
Motswaledi, Hendrik M.
Gorun, Samantha
Pesachov, Jacob
Markel, Michael
Silver, Maxwell I.
Brenkel, Megan
Feldman, Oriel J.
Kamen, Corey L.
Uleryk, Elizabeth
Guevara-Aguirre, Jaime
Fiebig, Klaus M.
author_facet Feldman, Peter R.
Gentile, Pietro
Piwko, Charles
Motswaledi, Hendrik M.
Gorun, Samantha
Pesachov, Jacob
Markel, Michael
Silver, Maxwell I.
Brenkel, Megan
Feldman, Oriel J.
Kamen, Corey L.
Uleryk, Elizabeth
Guevara-Aguirre, Jaime
Fiebig, Klaus M.
author_sort Feldman, Peter R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) affects almost half the population, and several treatments intending to regenerate a normal scalp hair phenotype are used. This is the first study comparing treatment efficacy response and resistance using standardized continuous outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To systematically compare the relative efficacy of treatments used for terminal hair (TH) regrowth in women and men with AGA. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted (from inception to August 11, 2021) to identify randomized, Placebo-controlled trials with ≥ 20 patients and reporting changes in TH density after 24 weeks. Efficacy was analyzed by sex at 12 and 24 weeks using Bayesian network meta-analysis (B-NMA) and compared to frequentist and continuous outcomes profiles. RESULTS: The search identified 2,314 unique articles. Ninety-eight were included for full-text review, and 17 articles met the inclusion criteria for data extraction and analyses. Eligible treatments included ALRV5XR, Dutasteride 0.5 mg/day, Finasteride 1 mg/day, low-level laser comb treatment (LLLT), Minoxidil 2% and 5%, Nutrafol, and Viviscal. At 24 weeks, the B-NMA regrowth efficacy in TH/cm(2) and significance ((**)) in women were ALRV5XR: 30.09(**), LLLT: 16.62(**), Minoxidil 2%: 12.13(**), Minoxidil 5%: 10.82(**), and Nutrafol: 7.32(**), and in men; ALRV5XR: 21.03(**), LLLT: 18.75(**), Dutasteride: 18.37(**), Viviscal: 13.23, Minoxidil 5%: 13.13(**), Finasteride: 12.38, and Minoxidil 2%: 10.54. Two distinct TH regrowth response profiles were found; Continuous: ALRV5XR regrowth rates were linear in men and accelerated in women; Resistant: after 12 weeks, LLLT, Nutrafol, and Viviscal regrowth rates attenuated while Dutasteride and Finasteride plateaued; Minoxidil 2% and 5% lost some regrowth. There were no statistical differences for the same treatment between women and men. B-NMA provided more accurate, statistically relevant, and conservative results than the frequentist-NMA. CONCLUSION: Some TH regrowth can be expected from most AGA treatments with less variability in women than men. Responses to drug treatments were rapid, showing strong early efficacy followed by the greatest resistance effects from flatlining to loss of regrowth after 12–16 weeks. Finasteride, Minoxidil 2% and Viviscal in men were not statistically different from Placebo. LLLT appeared more efficacious than pharmaceuticals. The natural product formulation ALRV5XR showed better efficacy in all tested parameters without signs of treatment resistance (see Graphical abstract). SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42021268040, identifier CRD42021268040.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9900126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99001262023-02-07 Hair regrowth treatment efficacy and resistance in androgenetic alopecia: A systematic review and continuous Bayesian network meta-analysis Feldman, Peter R. Gentile, Pietro Piwko, Charles Motswaledi, Hendrik M. Gorun, Samantha Pesachov, Jacob Markel, Michael Silver, Maxwell I. Brenkel, Megan Feldman, Oriel J. Kamen, Corey L. Uleryk, Elizabeth Guevara-Aguirre, Jaime Fiebig, Klaus M. Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) affects almost half the population, and several treatments intending to regenerate a normal scalp hair phenotype are used. This is the first study comparing treatment efficacy response and resistance using standardized continuous outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To systematically compare the relative efficacy of treatments used for terminal hair (TH) regrowth in women and men with AGA. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted (from inception to August 11, 2021) to identify randomized, Placebo-controlled trials with ≥ 20 patients and reporting changes in TH density after 24 weeks. Efficacy was analyzed by sex at 12 and 24 weeks using Bayesian network meta-analysis (B-NMA) and compared to frequentist and continuous outcomes profiles. RESULTS: The search identified 2,314 unique articles. Ninety-eight were included for full-text review, and 17 articles met the inclusion criteria for data extraction and analyses. Eligible treatments included ALRV5XR, Dutasteride 0.5 mg/day, Finasteride 1 mg/day, low-level laser comb treatment (LLLT), Minoxidil 2% and 5%, Nutrafol, and Viviscal. At 24 weeks, the B-NMA regrowth efficacy in TH/cm(2) and significance ((**)) in women were ALRV5XR: 30.09(**), LLLT: 16.62(**), Minoxidil 2%: 12.13(**), Minoxidil 5%: 10.82(**), and Nutrafol: 7.32(**), and in men; ALRV5XR: 21.03(**), LLLT: 18.75(**), Dutasteride: 18.37(**), Viviscal: 13.23, Minoxidil 5%: 13.13(**), Finasteride: 12.38, and Minoxidil 2%: 10.54. Two distinct TH regrowth response profiles were found; Continuous: ALRV5XR regrowth rates were linear in men and accelerated in women; Resistant: after 12 weeks, LLLT, Nutrafol, and Viviscal regrowth rates attenuated while Dutasteride and Finasteride plateaued; Minoxidil 2% and 5% lost some regrowth. There were no statistical differences for the same treatment between women and men. B-NMA provided more accurate, statistically relevant, and conservative results than the frequentist-NMA. CONCLUSION: Some TH regrowth can be expected from most AGA treatments with less variability in women than men. Responses to drug treatments were rapid, showing strong early efficacy followed by the greatest resistance effects from flatlining to loss of regrowth after 12–16 weeks. Finasteride, Minoxidil 2% and Viviscal in men were not statistically different from Placebo. LLLT appeared more efficacious than pharmaceuticals. The natural product formulation ALRV5XR showed better efficacy in all tested parameters without signs of treatment resistance (see Graphical abstract). SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42021268040, identifier CRD42021268040. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9900126/ /pubmed/36755885 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.998623 Text en Copyright © 2023 Feldman, Gentile, Piwko, Motswaledi, Gorun, Pesachov, Markel, Silver, Brenkel, Feldman, Kamen, Uleryk, Guevara-Aguirre and Fiebig. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Feldman, Peter R.
Gentile, Pietro
Piwko, Charles
Motswaledi, Hendrik M.
Gorun, Samantha
Pesachov, Jacob
Markel, Michael
Silver, Maxwell I.
Brenkel, Megan
Feldman, Oriel J.
Kamen, Corey L.
Uleryk, Elizabeth
Guevara-Aguirre, Jaime
Fiebig, Klaus M.
Hair regrowth treatment efficacy and resistance in androgenetic alopecia: A systematic review and continuous Bayesian network meta-analysis
title Hair regrowth treatment efficacy and resistance in androgenetic alopecia: A systematic review and continuous Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_full Hair regrowth treatment efficacy and resistance in androgenetic alopecia: A systematic review and continuous Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Hair regrowth treatment efficacy and resistance in androgenetic alopecia: A systematic review and continuous Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Hair regrowth treatment efficacy and resistance in androgenetic alopecia: A systematic review and continuous Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_short Hair regrowth treatment efficacy and resistance in androgenetic alopecia: A systematic review and continuous Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_sort hair regrowth treatment efficacy and resistance in androgenetic alopecia: a systematic review and continuous bayesian network meta-analysis
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9900126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36755885
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.998623
work_keys_str_mv AT feldmanpeterr hairregrowthtreatmentefficacyandresistanceinandrogeneticalopeciaasystematicreviewandcontinuousbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT gentilepietro hairregrowthtreatmentefficacyandresistanceinandrogeneticalopeciaasystematicreviewandcontinuousbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT piwkocharles hairregrowthtreatmentefficacyandresistanceinandrogeneticalopeciaasystematicreviewandcontinuousbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT motswaledihendrikm hairregrowthtreatmentefficacyandresistanceinandrogeneticalopeciaasystematicreviewandcontinuousbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT gorunsamantha hairregrowthtreatmentefficacyandresistanceinandrogeneticalopeciaasystematicreviewandcontinuousbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT pesachovjacob hairregrowthtreatmentefficacyandresistanceinandrogeneticalopeciaasystematicreviewandcontinuousbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT markelmichael hairregrowthtreatmentefficacyandresistanceinandrogeneticalopeciaasystematicreviewandcontinuousbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT silvermaxwelli hairregrowthtreatmentefficacyandresistanceinandrogeneticalopeciaasystematicreviewandcontinuousbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT brenkelmegan hairregrowthtreatmentefficacyandresistanceinandrogeneticalopeciaasystematicreviewandcontinuousbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT feldmanorielj hairregrowthtreatmentefficacyandresistanceinandrogeneticalopeciaasystematicreviewandcontinuousbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT kamencoreyl hairregrowthtreatmentefficacyandresistanceinandrogeneticalopeciaasystematicreviewandcontinuousbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT ulerykelizabeth hairregrowthtreatmentefficacyandresistanceinandrogeneticalopeciaasystematicreviewandcontinuousbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT guevaraaguirrejaime hairregrowthtreatmentefficacyandresistanceinandrogeneticalopeciaasystematicreviewandcontinuousbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT fiebigklausm hairregrowthtreatmentefficacyandresistanceinandrogeneticalopeciaasystematicreviewandcontinuousbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis