Cargando…

Comparison of Two Reciprocating and Anatomical Single File Techniques in Cleaning Oval Anatomies

INTRODUCTION: The present study aimed to compare the capability of two single-file shaping systems in disinfecting and cleaning long oval root canals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty single-rooted teeth were prepared, contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis and divided into two groups. Two samplings we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krokidis, Andreas, Nicola, Barabanti, Antonio, Cerutti, Panopoulos, Panos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9900148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36751407
http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.v18i1.33623
_version_ 1784882784429408256
author Krokidis, Andreas
Nicola, Barabanti
Antonio, Cerutti
Panopoulos, Panos
author_facet Krokidis, Andreas
Nicola, Barabanti
Antonio, Cerutti
Panopoulos, Panos
author_sort Krokidis, Andreas
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The present study aimed to compare the capability of two single-file shaping systems in disinfecting and cleaning long oval root canals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty single-rooted teeth were prepared, contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis and divided into two groups. Two samplings were obtained; S1 before chemo-mechanical preparation and S2 after the preparation. Depending on the group, chemo-mechanical preparation was performed with XP-endo Shaper (XPS) and Wave One Gold (WOG). Five teeth from each group were observed under scanning electron microscopy (1000×) to evaluate the cleanliness of root canals at 3, 6 and 9 mm from the apex. All probability (P-values) were two-tailed, statistical significance was set at 0.05 and analyses were conducted using SPSS statistical software. RESULTS: A significant reduction in the colony forming units was observed from S1 to S2 in both tested groups. In S2, XPS group obtained significantly lower colony forming units (P<0.001). In the cleanliness study, XPS group resulted in significantly cleaner canals compared to WOG. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this in vitro study XPS system was more effective in disinfecting and cleaning long oval canals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9900148
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Iranian Center for Endodontic Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99001482023-02-06 Comparison of Two Reciprocating and Anatomical Single File Techniques in Cleaning Oval Anatomies Krokidis, Andreas Nicola, Barabanti Antonio, Cerutti Panopoulos, Panos Iran Endod J Original Article INTRODUCTION: The present study aimed to compare the capability of two single-file shaping systems in disinfecting and cleaning long oval root canals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty single-rooted teeth were prepared, contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis and divided into two groups. Two samplings were obtained; S1 before chemo-mechanical preparation and S2 after the preparation. Depending on the group, chemo-mechanical preparation was performed with XP-endo Shaper (XPS) and Wave One Gold (WOG). Five teeth from each group were observed under scanning electron microscopy (1000×) to evaluate the cleanliness of root canals at 3, 6 and 9 mm from the apex. All probability (P-values) were two-tailed, statistical significance was set at 0.05 and analyses were conducted using SPSS statistical software. RESULTS: A significant reduction in the colony forming units was observed from S1 to S2 in both tested groups. In S2, XPS group obtained significantly lower colony forming units (P<0.001). In the cleanliness study, XPS group resulted in significantly cleaner canals compared to WOG. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this in vitro study XPS system was more effective in disinfecting and cleaning long oval canals. Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9900148/ /pubmed/36751407 http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.v18i1.33623 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This open-access article has been distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Krokidis, Andreas
Nicola, Barabanti
Antonio, Cerutti
Panopoulos, Panos
Comparison of Two Reciprocating and Anatomical Single File Techniques in Cleaning Oval Anatomies
title Comparison of Two Reciprocating and Anatomical Single File Techniques in Cleaning Oval Anatomies
title_full Comparison of Two Reciprocating and Anatomical Single File Techniques in Cleaning Oval Anatomies
title_fullStr Comparison of Two Reciprocating and Anatomical Single File Techniques in Cleaning Oval Anatomies
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Two Reciprocating and Anatomical Single File Techniques in Cleaning Oval Anatomies
title_short Comparison of Two Reciprocating and Anatomical Single File Techniques in Cleaning Oval Anatomies
title_sort comparison of two reciprocating and anatomical single file techniques in cleaning oval anatomies
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9900148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36751407
http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.v18i1.33623
work_keys_str_mv AT krokidisandreas comparisonoftworeciprocatingandanatomicalsinglefiletechniquesincleaningovalanatomies
AT nicolabarabanti comparisonoftworeciprocatingandanatomicalsinglefiletechniquesincleaningovalanatomies
AT antoniocerutti comparisonoftworeciprocatingandanatomicalsinglefiletechniquesincleaningovalanatomies
AT panopoulospanos comparisonoftworeciprocatingandanatomicalsinglefiletechniquesincleaningovalanatomies