Cargando…
Comparison of Two Reciprocating and Anatomical Single File Techniques in Cleaning Oval Anatomies
INTRODUCTION: The present study aimed to compare the capability of two single-file shaping systems in disinfecting and cleaning long oval root canals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty single-rooted teeth were prepared, contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis and divided into two groups. Two samplings we...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Iranian Center for Endodontic Research
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9900148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36751407 http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.v18i1.33623 |
_version_ | 1784882784429408256 |
---|---|
author | Krokidis, Andreas Nicola, Barabanti Antonio, Cerutti Panopoulos, Panos |
author_facet | Krokidis, Andreas Nicola, Barabanti Antonio, Cerutti Panopoulos, Panos |
author_sort | Krokidis, Andreas |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The present study aimed to compare the capability of two single-file shaping systems in disinfecting and cleaning long oval root canals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty single-rooted teeth were prepared, contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis and divided into two groups. Two samplings were obtained; S1 before chemo-mechanical preparation and S2 after the preparation. Depending on the group, chemo-mechanical preparation was performed with XP-endo Shaper (XPS) and Wave One Gold (WOG). Five teeth from each group were observed under scanning electron microscopy (1000×) to evaluate the cleanliness of root canals at 3, 6 and 9 mm from the apex. All probability (P-values) were two-tailed, statistical significance was set at 0.05 and analyses were conducted using SPSS statistical software. RESULTS: A significant reduction in the colony forming units was observed from S1 to S2 in both tested groups. In S2, XPS group obtained significantly lower colony forming units (P<0.001). In the cleanliness study, XPS group resulted in significantly cleaner canals compared to WOG. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this in vitro study XPS system was more effective in disinfecting and cleaning long oval canals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9900148 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Iranian Center for Endodontic Research |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99001482023-02-06 Comparison of Two Reciprocating and Anatomical Single File Techniques in Cleaning Oval Anatomies Krokidis, Andreas Nicola, Barabanti Antonio, Cerutti Panopoulos, Panos Iran Endod J Original Article INTRODUCTION: The present study aimed to compare the capability of two single-file shaping systems in disinfecting and cleaning long oval root canals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty single-rooted teeth were prepared, contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis and divided into two groups. Two samplings were obtained; S1 before chemo-mechanical preparation and S2 after the preparation. Depending on the group, chemo-mechanical preparation was performed with XP-endo Shaper (XPS) and Wave One Gold (WOG). Five teeth from each group were observed under scanning electron microscopy (1000×) to evaluate the cleanliness of root canals at 3, 6 and 9 mm from the apex. All probability (P-values) were two-tailed, statistical significance was set at 0.05 and analyses were conducted using SPSS statistical software. RESULTS: A significant reduction in the colony forming units was observed from S1 to S2 in both tested groups. In S2, XPS group obtained significantly lower colony forming units (P<0.001). In the cleanliness study, XPS group resulted in significantly cleaner canals compared to WOG. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this in vitro study XPS system was more effective in disinfecting and cleaning long oval canals. Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9900148/ /pubmed/36751407 http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.v18i1.33623 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This open-access article has been distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Krokidis, Andreas Nicola, Barabanti Antonio, Cerutti Panopoulos, Panos Comparison of Two Reciprocating and Anatomical Single File Techniques in Cleaning Oval Anatomies |
title | Comparison of Two Reciprocating and Anatomical Single File Techniques in Cleaning Oval Anatomies |
title_full | Comparison of Two Reciprocating and Anatomical Single File Techniques in Cleaning Oval Anatomies |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Two Reciprocating and Anatomical Single File Techniques in Cleaning Oval Anatomies |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Two Reciprocating and Anatomical Single File Techniques in Cleaning Oval Anatomies |
title_short | Comparison of Two Reciprocating and Anatomical Single File Techniques in Cleaning Oval Anatomies |
title_sort | comparison of two reciprocating and anatomical single file techniques in cleaning oval anatomies |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9900148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36751407 http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/iej.v18i1.33623 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krokidisandreas comparisonoftworeciprocatingandanatomicalsinglefiletechniquesincleaningovalanatomies AT nicolabarabanti comparisonoftworeciprocatingandanatomicalsinglefiletechniquesincleaningovalanatomies AT antoniocerutti comparisonoftworeciprocatingandanatomicalsinglefiletechniquesincleaningovalanatomies AT panopoulospanos comparisonoftworeciprocatingandanatomicalsinglefiletechniquesincleaningovalanatomies |