Cargando…

Psychometric Validation of the CLEFT-Q Patient Reported Outcome Measure: A Prospective Study to Examine Cross-Sectional Construct Validity

OBJECTIVE: CLEFT-Q is a condition-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for patients with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P). The aim of this study was to examine the cross-sectional construct validity of the CLEFT-Q scales. DESIGN: Construct validity was assessed through a prospective study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miroshnychenko, Anna, Rae, Charlene, Riff, Karen Wong, Forrest, Christopher, Goodacre, Tim, Swan, Marc, Slator, Rona, Goldstein, Jesse, Thoma, Achilleas, Harman, Karen, Klassen, Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9900191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34919453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10556656211062837
_version_ 1784882795165777920
author Miroshnychenko, Anna
Rae, Charlene
Riff, Karen Wong
Forrest, Christopher
Goodacre, Tim
Swan, Marc
Slator, Rona
Goldstein, Jesse
Thoma, Achilleas
Harman, Karen
Klassen, Anne
author_facet Miroshnychenko, Anna
Rae, Charlene
Riff, Karen Wong
Forrest, Christopher
Goodacre, Tim
Swan, Marc
Slator, Rona
Goldstein, Jesse
Thoma, Achilleas
Harman, Karen
Klassen, Anne
author_sort Miroshnychenko, Anna
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: CLEFT-Q is a condition-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for patients with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P). The aim of this study was to examine the cross-sectional construct validity of the CLEFT-Q scales. DESIGN: Construct validity was assessed through a prospective study that tested hypotheses regarding correlations of scores with other PROMs that measure related constructs. SETTING: Seven cleft centres in Canada, the USA, and UK were involved. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients were aged eight to 29 years with CL/P. INTERVENTIONS: Before undergoing rhinoplasty, orthognathic, cleft lip scar revision, and alveolar bone graft, participants were asked to complete the following PROMs: CLEFT-Q (9 scales), Child Oral Health Impact Profile (socio-emotional subscale) and Cleft Hearing Appearance and Speech Questionnaire (features 1 subscale). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The correlation coefficients examining the relationship between the scales were the main outcome measures. Correlations (Spearman) were calculated and interpreted as follows: <0.3 weak, 0.30 to 0.50 moderate, ≥0.50 strong. RESULTS: Participants (n = 177) were mostly male (61%) and aged between eight and 11 years (42%). Overall, 38 of 52 (73%) hypotheses tested were supported. More specifically, 20 of 26 (77%) hypotheses about correlations between the appearance scales were supported, two of three (67%) hypotheses about correlations between the health-related quality of life scales were supported, and 16 of 23 (70%) hypotheses about correlations between the appearance and health-related quality of life scales were supported. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-sectional construct validity of the CLEFT-Q scales adds further evidence of the psychometric properties of this instrument.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9900191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99001912023-02-07 Psychometric Validation of the CLEFT-Q Patient Reported Outcome Measure: A Prospective Study to Examine Cross-Sectional Construct Validity Miroshnychenko, Anna Rae, Charlene Riff, Karen Wong Forrest, Christopher Goodacre, Tim Swan, Marc Slator, Rona Goldstein, Jesse Thoma, Achilleas Harman, Karen Klassen, Anne Cleft Palate Craniofac J Original Articles OBJECTIVE: CLEFT-Q is a condition-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for patients with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P). The aim of this study was to examine the cross-sectional construct validity of the CLEFT-Q scales. DESIGN: Construct validity was assessed through a prospective study that tested hypotheses regarding correlations of scores with other PROMs that measure related constructs. SETTING: Seven cleft centres in Canada, the USA, and UK were involved. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients were aged eight to 29 years with CL/P. INTERVENTIONS: Before undergoing rhinoplasty, orthognathic, cleft lip scar revision, and alveolar bone graft, participants were asked to complete the following PROMs: CLEFT-Q (9 scales), Child Oral Health Impact Profile (socio-emotional subscale) and Cleft Hearing Appearance and Speech Questionnaire (features 1 subscale). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The correlation coefficients examining the relationship between the scales were the main outcome measures. Correlations (Spearman) were calculated and interpreted as follows: <0.3 weak, 0.30 to 0.50 moderate, ≥0.50 strong. RESULTS: Participants (n = 177) were mostly male (61%) and aged between eight and 11 years (42%). Overall, 38 of 52 (73%) hypotheses tested were supported. More specifically, 20 of 26 (77%) hypotheses about correlations between the appearance scales were supported, two of three (67%) hypotheses about correlations between the health-related quality of life scales were supported, and 16 of 23 (70%) hypotheses about correlations between the appearance and health-related quality of life scales were supported. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-sectional construct validity of the CLEFT-Q scales adds further evidence of the psychometric properties of this instrument. SAGE Publications 2021-12-17 2023-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9900191/ /pubmed/34919453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10556656211062837 Text en © 2021, American Cleft Palate Craniofacial Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Miroshnychenko, Anna
Rae, Charlene
Riff, Karen Wong
Forrest, Christopher
Goodacre, Tim
Swan, Marc
Slator, Rona
Goldstein, Jesse
Thoma, Achilleas
Harman, Karen
Klassen, Anne
Psychometric Validation of the CLEFT-Q Patient Reported Outcome Measure: A Prospective Study to Examine Cross-Sectional Construct Validity
title Psychometric Validation of the CLEFT-Q Patient Reported Outcome Measure: A Prospective Study to Examine Cross-Sectional Construct Validity
title_full Psychometric Validation of the CLEFT-Q Patient Reported Outcome Measure: A Prospective Study to Examine Cross-Sectional Construct Validity
title_fullStr Psychometric Validation of the CLEFT-Q Patient Reported Outcome Measure: A Prospective Study to Examine Cross-Sectional Construct Validity
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric Validation of the CLEFT-Q Patient Reported Outcome Measure: A Prospective Study to Examine Cross-Sectional Construct Validity
title_short Psychometric Validation of the CLEFT-Q Patient Reported Outcome Measure: A Prospective Study to Examine Cross-Sectional Construct Validity
title_sort psychometric validation of the cleft-q patient reported outcome measure: a prospective study to examine cross-sectional construct validity
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9900191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34919453
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10556656211062837
work_keys_str_mv AT miroshnychenkoanna psychometricvalidationofthecleftqpatientreportedoutcomemeasureaprospectivestudytoexaminecrosssectionalconstructvalidity
AT raecharlene psychometricvalidationofthecleftqpatientreportedoutcomemeasureaprospectivestudytoexaminecrosssectionalconstructvalidity
AT riffkarenwong psychometricvalidationofthecleftqpatientreportedoutcomemeasureaprospectivestudytoexaminecrosssectionalconstructvalidity
AT forrestchristopher psychometricvalidationofthecleftqpatientreportedoutcomemeasureaprospectivestudytoexaminecrosssectionalconstructvalidity
AT goodacretim psychometricvalidationofthecleftqpatientreportedoutcomemeasureaprospectivestudytoexaminecrosssectionalconstructvalidity
AT swanmarc psychometricvalidationofthecleftqpatientreportedoutcomemeasureaprospectivestudytoexaminecrosssectionalconstructvalidity
AT slatorrona psychometricvalidationofthecleftqpatientreportedoutcomemeasureaprospectivestudytoexaminecrosssectionalconstructvalidity
AT goldsteinjesse psychometricvalidationofthecleftqpatientreportedoutcomemeasureaprospectivestudytoexaminecrosssectionalconstructvalidity
AT thomaachilleas psychometricvalidationofthecleftqpatientreportedoutcomemeasureaprospectivestudytoexaminecrosssectionalconstructvalidity
AT harmankaren psychometricvalidationofthecleftqpatientreportedoutcomemeasureaprospectivestudytoexaminecrosssectionalconstructvalidity
AT klassenanne psychometricvalidationofthecleftqpatientreportedoutcomemeasureaprospectivestudytoexaminecrosssectionalconstructvalidity