Cargando…
Psychometric Validation of the CLEFT-Q Patient Reported Outcome Measure: A Prospective Study to Examine Cross-Sectional Construct Validity
OBJECTIVE: CLEFT-Q is a condition-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for patients with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P). The aim of this study was to examine the cross-sectional construct validity of the CLEFT-Q scales. DESIGN: Construct validity was assessed through a prospective study...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9900191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34919453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10556656211062837 |
_version_ | 1784882795165777920 |
---|---|
author | Miroshnychenko, Anna Rae, Charlene Riff, Karen Wong Forrest, Christopher Goodacre, Tim Swan, Marc Slator, Rona Goldstein, Jesse Thoma, Achilleas Harman, Karen Klassen, Anne |
author_facet | Miroshnychenko, Anna Rae, Charlene Riff, Karen Wong Forrest, Christopher Goodacre, Tim Swan, Marc Slator, Rona Goldstein, Jesse Thoma, Achilleas Harman, Karen Klassen, Anne |
author_sort | Miroshnychenko, Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: CLEFT-Q is a condition-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for patients with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P). The aim of this study was to examine the cross-sectional construct validity of the CLEFT-Q scales. DESIGN: Construct validity was assessed through a prospective study that tested hypotheses regarding correlations of scores with other PROMs that measure related constructs. SETTING: Seven cleft centres in Canada, the USA, and UK were involved. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients were aged eight to 29 years with CL/P. INTERVENTIONS: Before undergoing rhinoplasty, orthognathic, cleft lip scar revision, and alveolar bone graft, participants were asked to complete the following PROMs: CLEFT-Q (9 scales), Child Oral Health Impact Profile (socio-emotional subscale) and Cleft Hearing Appearance and Speech Questionnaire (features 1 subscale). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The correlation coefficients examining the relationship between the scales were the main outcome measures. Correlations (Spearman) were calculated and interpreted as follows: <0.3 weak, 0.30 to 0.50 moderate, ≥0.50 strong. RESULTS: Participants (n = 177) were mostly male (61%) and aged between eight and 11 years (42%). Overall, 38 of 52 (73%) hypotheses tested were supported. More specifically, 20 of 26 (77%) hypotheses about correlations between the appearance scales were supported, two of three (67%) hypotheses about correlations between the health-related quality of life scales were supported, and 16 of 23 (70%) hypotheses about correlations between the appearance and health-related quality of life scales were supported. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-sectional construct validity of the CLEFT-Q scales adds further evidence of the psychometric properties of this instrument. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9900191 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99001912023-02-07 Psychometric Validation of the CLEFT-Q Patient Reported Outcome Measure: A Prospective Study to Examine Cross-Sectional Construct Validity Miroshnychenko, Anna Rae, Charlene Riff, Karen Wong Forrest, Christopher Goodacre, Tim Swan, Marc Slator, Rona Goldstein, Jesse Thoma, Achilleas Harman, Karen Klassen, Anne Cleft Palate Craniofac J Original Articles OBJECTIVE: CLEFT-Q is a condition-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for patients with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P). The aim of this study was to examine the cross-sectional construct validity of the CLEFT-Q scales. DESIGN: Construct validity was assessed through a prospective study that tested hypotheses regarding correlations of scores with other PROMs that measure related constructs. SETTING: Seven cleft centres in Canada, the USA, and UK were involved. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients were aged eight to 29 years with CL/P. INTERVENTIONS: Before undergoing rhinoplasty, orthognathic, cleft lip scar revision, and alveolar bone graft, participants were asked to complete the following PROMs: CLEFT-Q (9 scales), Child Oral Health Impact Profile (socio-emotional subscale) and Cleft Hearing Appearance and Speech Questionnaire (features 1 subscale). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The correlation coefficients examining the relationship between the scales were the main outcome measures. Correlations (Spearman) were calculated and interpreted as follows: <0.3 weak, 0.30 to 0.50 moderate, ≥0.50 strong. RESULTS: Participants (n = 177) were mostly male (61%) and aged between eight and 11 years (42%). Overall, 38 of 52 (73%) hypotheses tested were supported. More specifically, 20 of 26 (77%) hypotheses about correlations between the appearance scales were supported, two of three (67%) hypotheses about correlations between the health-related quality of life scales were supported, and 16 of 23 (70%) hypotheses about correlations between the appearance and health-related quality of life scales were supported. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-sectional construct validity of the CLEFT-Q scales adds further evidence of the psychometric properties of this instrument. SAGE Publications 2021-12-17 2023-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9900191/ /pubmed/34919453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10556656211062837 Text en © 2021, American Cleft Palate Craniofacial Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Miroshnychenko, Anna Rae, Charlene Riff, Karen Wong Forrest, Christopher Goodacre, Tim Swan, Marc Slator, Rona Goldstein, Jesse Thoma, Achilleas Harman, Karen Klassen, Anne Psychometric Validation of the CLEFT-Q Patient Reported Outcome Measure: A Prospective Study to Examine Cross-Sectional Construct Validity |
title | Psychometric Validation of the CLEFT-Q Patient Reported Outcome
Measure: A Prospective Study to Examine Cross-Sectional Construct
Validity |
title_full | Psychometric Validation of the CLEFT-Q Patient Reported Outcome
Measure: A Prospective Study to Examine Cross-Sectional Construct
Validity |
title_fullStr | Psychometric Validation of the CLEFT-Q Patient Reported Outcome
Measure: A Prospective Study to Examine Cross-Sectional Construct
Validity |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychometric Validation of the CLEFT-Q Patient Reported Outcome
Measure: A Prospective Study to Examine Cross-Sectional Construct
Validity |
title_short | Psychometric Validation of the CLEFT-Q Patient Reported Outcome
Measure: A Prospective Study to Examine Cross-Sectional Construct
Validity |
title_sort | psychometric validation of the cleft-q patient reported outcome
measure: a prospective study to examine cross-sectional construct
validity |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9900191/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34919453 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10556656211062837 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT miroshnychenkoanna psychometricvalidationofthecleftqpatientreportedoutcomemeasureaprospectivestudytoexaminecrosssectionalconstructvalidity AT raecharlene psychometricvalidationofthecleftqpatientreportedoutcomemeasureaprospectivestudytoexaminecrosssectionalconstructvalidity AT riffkarenwong psychometricvalidationofthecleftqpatientreportedoutcomemeasureaprospectivestudytoexaminecrosssectionalconstructvalidity AT forrestchristopher psychometricvalidationofthecleftqpatientreportedoutcomemeasureaprospectivestudytoexaminecrosssectionalconstructvalidity AT goodacretim psychometricvalidationofthecleftqpatientreportedoutcomemeasureaprospectivestudytoexaminecrosssectionalconstructvalidity AT swanmarc psychometricvalidationofthecleftqpatientreportedoutcomemeasureaprospectivestudytoexaminecrosssectionalconstructvalidity AT slatorrona psychometricvalidationofthecleftqpatientreportedoutcomemeasureaprospectivestudytoexaminecrosssectionalconstructvalidity AT goldsteinjesse psychometricvalidationofthecleftqpatientreportedoutcomemeasureaprospectivestudytoexaminecrosssectionalconstructvalidity AT thomaachilleas psychometricvalidationofthecleftqpatientreportedoutcomemeasureaprospectivestudytoexaminecrosssectionalconstructvalidity AT harmankaren psychometricvalidationofthecleftqpatientreportedoutcomemeasureaprospectivestudytoexaminecrosssectionalconstructvalidity AT klassenanne psychometricvalidationofthecleftqpatientreportedoutcomemeasureaprospectivestudytoexaminecrosssectionalconstructvalidity |