Cargando…

Evaluation of the impact of assistive artificial intelligence on ultrasound scanning for regional anaesthesia

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia relies on the visualisation of key landmark, target, and safety structures on ultrasound. However, this can be challenging, particularly for inexperienced practitioners. Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being applied to medical image int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bowness, James S., Macfarlane, Alan J.R., Burckett-St Laurent, David, Harris, Catherine, Margetts, Steve, Morecroft, Megan, Phillips, David, Rees, Tom, Sleep, Nick, Vasalauskaite, Asta, West, Simeon, Noble, J. Alison, Higham, Helen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9900732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36088136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2022.07.049
_version_ 1784882909909352448
author Bowness, James S.
Macfarlane, Alan J.R.
Burckett-St Laurent, David
Harris, Catherine
Margetts, Steve
Morecroft, Megan
Phillips, David
Rees, Tom
Sleep, Nick
Vasalauskaite, Asta
West, Simeon
Noble, J. Alison
Higham, Helen
author_facet Bowness, James S.
Macfarlane, Alan J.R.
Burckett-St Laurent, David
Harris, Catherine
Margetts, Steve
Morecroft, Megan
Phillips, David
Rees, Tom
Sleep, Nick
Vasalauskaite, Asta
West, Simeon
Noble, J. Alison
Higham, Helen
author_sort Bowness, James S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia relies on the visualisation of key landmark, target, and safety structures on ultrasound. However, this can be challenging, particularly for inexperienced practitioners. Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being applied to medical image interpretation, including ultrasound. In this exploratory study, we evaluated ultrasound scanning performance by non-experts in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia, with and without the use of an assistive AI device. METHODS: Twenty-one anaesthetists, all non-experts in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia, underwent a standardised teaching session in ultrasound scanning for six peripheral nerve blocks. All then performed a scan for each block; half of the scans were performed with AI assistance and half without. Experts assessed acquisition of the correct block view and correct identification of sono-anatomical structures on each view. Participants reported scan confidence, experts provided a global rating score of scan performance, and scans were timed. RESULTS: Experts assessed 126 ultrasound scans. Participants acquired the correct block view in 56/62 (90.3%) scans with the device compared with 47/62 (75.1%) without (P=0.031, two data points lost). Correct identification of sono-anatomical structures on the view was 188/212 (88.8%) with the device compared with 161/208 (77.4%) without (P=0.002). There was no significant overall difference in participant confidence, expert global performance score, or scan time. CONCLUSIONS: Use of an assistive AI device was associated with improved ultrasound image acquisition and interpretation. Such technology holds potential to augment performance of ultrasound scanning for regional anaesthesia by non-experts, potentially expanding patient access to these techniques. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05156099.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9900732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99007322023-02-07 Evaluation of the impact of assistive artificial intelligence on ultrasound scanning for regional anaesthesia Bowness, James S. Macfarlane, Alan J.R. Burckett-St Laurent, David Harris, Catherine Margetts, Steve Morecroft, Megan Phillips, David Rees, Tom Sleep, Nick Vasalauskaite, Asta West, Simeon Noble, J. Alison Higham, Helen Br J Anaesth Regional Anaesthesia BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia relies on the visualisation of key landmark, target, and safety structures on ultrasound. However, this can be challenging, particularly for inexperienced practitioners. Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being applied to medical image interpretation, including ultrasound. In this exploratory study, we evaluated ultrasound scanning performance by non-experts in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia, with and without the use of an assistive AI device. METHODS: Twenty-one anaesthetists, all non-experts in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia, underwent a standardised teaching session in ultrasound scanning for six peripheral nerve blocks. All then performed a scan for each block; half of the scans were performed with AI assistance and half without. Experts assessed acquisition of the correct block view and correct identification of sono-anatomical structures on each view. Participants reported scan confidence, experts provided a global rating score of scan performance, and scans were timed. RESULTS: Experts assessed 126 ultrasound scans. Participants acquired the correct block view in 56/62 (90.3%) scans with the device compared with 47/62 (75.1%) without (P=0.031, two data points lost). Correct identification of sono-anatomical structures on the view was 188/212 (88.8%) with the device compared with 161/208 (77.4%) without (P=0.002). There was no significant overall difference in participant confidence, expert global performance score, or scan time. CONCLUSIONS: Use of an assistive AI device was associated with improved ultrasound image acquisition and interpretation. Such technology holds potential to augment performance of ultrasound scanning for regional anaesthesia by non-experts, potentially expanding patient access to these techniques. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05156099. Elsevier 2023-02 2022-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9900732/ /pubmed/36088136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2022.07.049 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regional Anaesthesia
Bowness, James S.
Macfarlane, Alan J.R.
Burckett-St Laurent, David
Harris, Catherine
Margetts, Steve
Morecroft, Megan
Phillips, David
Rees, Tom
Sleep, Nick
Vasalauskaite, Asta
West, Simeon
Noble, J. Alison
Higham, Helen
Evaluation of the impact of assistive artificial intelligence on ultrasound scanning for regional anaesthesia
title Evaluation of the impact of assistive artificial intelligence on ultrasound scanning for regional anaesthesia
title_full Evaluation of the impact of assistive artificial intelligence on ultrasound scanning for regional anaesthesia
title_fullStr Evaluation of the impact of assistive artificial intelligence on ultrasound scanning for regional anaesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the impact of assistive artificial intelligence on ultrasound scanning for regional anaesthesia
title_short Evaluation of the impact of assistive artificial intelligence on ultrasound scanning for regional anaesthesia
title_sort evaluation of the impact of assistive artificial intelligence on ultrasound scanning for regional anaesthesia
topic Regional Anaesthesia
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9900732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36088136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2022.07.049
work_keys_str_mv AT bownessjamess evaluationoftheimpactofassistiveartificialintelligenceonultrasoundscanningforregionalanaesthesia
AT macfarlanealanjr evaluationoftheimpactofassistiveartificialintelligenceonultrasoundscanningforregionalanaesthesia
AT burckettstlaurentdavid evaluationoftheimpactofassistiveartificialintelligenceonultrasoundscanningforregionalanaesthesia
AT harriscatherine evaluationoftheimpactofassistiveartificialintelligenceonultrasoundscanningforregionalanaesthesia
AT margettssteve evaluationoftheimpactofassistiveartificialintelligenceonultrasoundscanningforregionalanaesthesia
AT morecroftmegan evaluationoftheimpactofassistiveartificialintelligenceonultrasoundscanningforregionalanaesthesia
AT phillipsdavid evaluationoftheimpactofassistiveartificialintelligenceonultrasoundscanningforregionalanaesthesia
AT reestom evaluationoftheimpactofassistiveartificialintelligenceonultrasoundscanningforregionalanaesthesia
AT sleepnick evaluationoftheimpactofassistiveartificialintelligenceonultrasoundscanningforregionalanaesthesia
AT vasalauskaiteasta evaluationoftheimpactofassistiveartificialintelligenceonultrasoundscanningforregionalanaesthesia
AT westsimeon evaluationoftheimpactofassistiveartificialintelligenceonultrasoundscanningforregionalanaesthesia
AT noblejalison evaluationoftheimpactofassistiveartificialintelligenceonultrasoundscanningforregionalanaesthesia
AT highamhelen evaluationoftheimpactofassistiveartificialintelligenceonultrasoundscanningforregionalanaesthesia