Cargando…

in vivo quantitative FRET small animal imaging: intensity versus lifetime-based FRET

Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) microscopy is used in numerous biophysical and biomedical applications to monitor inter- and intramolecular interactions and conformational changes in the 2–10 nm range. FRET is currently being extended to in vivo optical imaging, its main application being i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Jason T., Sinsuebphon, Nattawut, Rudkouskaya, Alena, Michalet, Xavier, Intes, Xavier, Barroso, Margarida
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9900789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36747671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.24.525411
_version_ 1784882918397575168
author Smith, Jason T.
Sinsuebphon, Nattawut
Rudkouskaya, Alena
Michalet, Xavier
Intes, Xavier
Barroso, Margarida
author_facet Smith, Jason T.
Sinsuebphon, Nattawut
Rudkouskaya, Alena
Michalet, Xavier
Intes, Xavier
Barroso, Margarida
author_sort Smith, Jason T.
collection PubMed
description Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) microscopy is used in numerous biophysical and biomedical applications to monitor inter- and intramolecular interactions and conformational changes in the 2–10 nm range. FRET is currently being extended to in vivo optical imaging, its main application being in quantifying drug-target engagement or drug release in animal models of cancer using organic dye or nanoparticle-labeled probes. Herein, we compared FRET quantification using intensity-based FRET (sensitized emission FRET analysis with the 3-cube approach using an IVIS imager) and macroscopic fluorescence lifetime (MFLI) FRET using a custom system using a time-gated ICCD, for small animal optical in vivo imaging. The analytical expressions and experimental protocols required to quantify the product [Formula: see text] of the FRET efficiency [Formula: see text] and the fraction of donor molecules involved in FRET, [Formula: see text] , are described in detail for both methodologies. Dynamic in vivo FRET quantification of transferrin receptor-transferrin binding was acquired in live intact nude mice upon intravenous injection of near infrared-labeled transferrin FRET pair and benchmarked against in vitro FRET using hybridized oligonucleotides. Even though both in vivo imaging techniques provided similar dynamic trends for receptor-ligand engagement, we demonstrate that MFLI FRET has significant advantages. Whereas the sensitized emission FRET approach using the IVIS imager required 9 measurements (6 of which are used for calibration) acquired from three mice, MFLI FRET needed only one measurement collected from a single mouse, although a control mouse might be needed in a more general situation. Based on our study, MFLI therefore represents the method of choice for longitudinal preclinical FRET studies such as that of targeted drug delivery in intact, live mice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9900789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99007892023-02-07 in vivo quantitative FRET small animal imaging: intensity versus lifetime-based FRET Smith, Jason T. Sinsuebphon, Nattawut Rudkouskaya, Alena Michalet, Xavier Intes, Xavier Barroso, Margarida bioRxiv Article Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) microscopy is used in numerous biophysical and biomedical applications to monitor inter- and intramolecular interactions and conformational changes in the 2–10 nm range. FRET is currently being extended to in vivo optical imaging, its main application being in quantifying drug-target engagement or drug release in animal models of cancer using organic dye or nanoparticle-labeled probes. Herein, we compared FRET quantification using intensity-based FRET (sensitized emission FRET analysis with the 3-cube approach using an IVIS imager) and macroscopic fluorescence lifetime (MFLI) FRET using a custom system using a time-gated ICCD, for small animal optical in vivo imaging. The analytical expressions and experimental protocols required to quantify the product [Formula: see text] of the FRET efficiency [Formula: see text] and the fraction of donor molecules involved in FRET, [Formula: see text] , are described in detail for both methodologies. Dynamic in vivo FRET quantification of transferrin receptor-transferrin binding was acquired in live intact nude mice upon intravenous injection of near infrared-labeled transferrin FRET pair and benchmarked against in vitro FRET using hybridized oligonucleotides. Even though both in vivo imaging techniques provided similar dynamic trends for receptor-ligand engagement, we demonstrate that MFLI FRET has significant advantages. Whereas the sensitized emission FRET approach using the IVIS imager required 9 measurements (6 of which are used for calibration) acquired from three mice, MFLI FRET needed only one measurement collected from a single mouse, although a control mouse might be needed in a more general situation. Based on our study, MFLI therefore represents the method of choice for longitudinal preclinical FRET studies such as that of targeted drug delivery in intact, live mice. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9900789/ /pubmed/36747671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.24.525411 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
spellingShingle Article
Smith, Jason T.
Sinsuebphon, Nattawut
Rudkouskaya, Alena
Michalet, Xavier
Intes, Xavier
Barroso, Margarida
in vivo quantitative FRET small animal imaging: intensity versus lifetime-based FRET
title in vivo quantitative FRET small animal imaging: intensity versus lifetime-based FRET
title_full in vivo quantitative FRET small animal imaging: intensity versus lifetime-based FRET
title_fullStr in vivo quantitative FRET small animal imaging: intensity versus lifetime-based FRET
title_full_unstemmed in vivo quantitative FRET small animal imaging: intensity versus lifetime-based FRET
title_short in vivo quantitative FRET small animal imaging: intensity versus lifetime-based FRET
title_sort in vivo quantitative fret small animal imaging: intensity versus lifetime-based fret
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9900789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36747671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.24.525411
work_keys_str_mv AT smithjasont invivoquantitativefretsmallanimalimagingintensityversuslifetimebasedfret
AT sinsuebphonnattawut invivoquantitativefretsmallanimalimagingintensityversuslifetimebasedfret
AT rudkouskayaalena invivoquantitativefretsmallanimalimagingintensityversuslifetimebasedfret
AT michaletxavier invivoquantitativefretsmallanimalimagingintensityversuslifetimebasedfret
AT intesxavier invivoquantitativefretsmallanimalimagingintensityversuslifetimebasedfret
AT barrosomargarida invivoquantitativefretsmallanimalimagingintensityversuslifetimebasedfret