Cargando…
in vivo quantitative FRET small animal imaging: intensity versus lifetime-based FRET
Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) microscopy is used in numerous biophysical and biomedical applications to monitor inter- and intramolecular interactions and conformational changes in the 2–10 nm range. FRET is currently being extended to in vivo optical imaging, its main application being i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9900789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36747671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.24.525411 |
_version_ | 1784882918397575168 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Jason T. Sinsuebphon, Nattawut Rudkouskaya, Alena Michalet, Xavier Intes, Xavier Barroso, Margarida |
author_facet | Smith, Jason T. Sinsuebphon, Nattawut Rudkouskaya, Alena Michalet, Xavier Intes, Xavier Barroso, Margarida |
author_sort | Smith, Jason T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) microscopy is used in numerous biophysical and biomedical applications to monitor inter- and intramolecular interactions and conformational changes in the 2–10 nm range. FRET is currently being extended to in vivo optical imaging, its main application being in quantifying drug-target engagement or drug release in animal models of cancer using organic dye or nanoparticle-labeled probes. Herein, we compared FRET quantification using intensity-based FRET (sensitized emission FRET analysis with the 3-cube approach using an IVIS imager) and macroscopic fluorescence lifetime (MFLI) FRET using a custom system using a time-gated ICCD, for small animal optical in vivo imaging. The analytical expressions and experimental protocols required to quantify the product [Formula: see text] of the FRET efficiency [Formula: see text] and the fraction of donor molecules involved in FRET, [Formula: see text] , are described in detail for both methodologies. Dynamic in vivo FRET quantification of transferrin receptor-transferrin binding was acquired in live intact nude mice upon intravenous injection of near infrared-labeled transferrin FRET pair and benchmarked against in vitro FRET using hybridized oligonucleotides. Even though both in vivo imaging techniques provided similar dynamic trends for receptor-ligand engagement, we demonstrate that MFLI FRET has significant advantages. Whereas the sensitized emission FRET approach using the IVIS imager required 9 measurements (6 of which are used for calibration) acquired from three mice, MFLI FRET needed only one measurement collected from a single mouse, although a control mouse might be needed in a more general situation. Based on our study, MFLI therefore represents the method of choice for longitudinal preclinical FRET studies such as that of targeted drug delivery in intact, live mice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9900789 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99007892023-02-07 in vivo quantitative FRET small animal imaging: intensity versus lifetime-based FRET Smith, Jason T. Sinsuebphon, Nattawut Rudkouskaya, Alena Michalet, Xavier Intes, Xavier Barroso, Margarida bioRxiv Article Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) microscopy is used in numerous biophysical and biomedical applications to monitor inter- and intramolecular interactions and conformational changes in the 2–10 nm range. FRET is currently being extended to in vivo optical imaging, its main application being in quantifying drug-target engagement or drug release in animal models of cancer using organic dye or nanoparticle-labeled probes. Herein, we compared FRET quantification using intensity-based FRET (sensitized emission FRET analysis with the 3-cube approach using an IVIS imager) and macroscopic fluorescence lifetime (MFLI) FRET using a custom system using a time-gated ICCD, for small animal optical in vivo imaging. The analytical expressions and experimental protocols required to quantify the product [Formula: see text] of the FRET efficiency [Formula: see text] and the fraction of donor molecules involved in FRET, [Formula: see text] , are described in detail for both methodologies. Dynamic in vivo FRET quantification of transferrin receptor-transferrin binding was acquired in live intact nude mice upon intravenous injection of near infrared-labeled transferrin FRET pair and benchmarked against in vitro FRET using hybridized oligonucleotides. Even though both in vivo imaging techniques provided similar dynamic trends for receptor-ligand engagement, we demonstrate that MFLI FRET has significant advantages. Whereas the sensitized emission FRET approach using the IVIS imager required 9 measurements (6 of which are used for calibration) acquired from three mice, MFLI FRET needed only one measurement collected from a single mouse, although a control mouse might be needed in a more general situation. Based on our study, MFLI therefore represents the method of choice for longitudinal preclinical FRET studies such as that of targeted drug delivery in intact, live mice. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9900789/ /pubmed/36747671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.24.525411 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. |
spellingShingle | Article Smith, Jason T. Sinsuebphon, Nattawut Rudkouskaya, Alena Michalet, Xavier Intes, Xavier Barroso, Margarida in vivo quantitative FRET small animal imaging: intensity versus lifetime-based FRET |
title | in vivo quantitative FRET small animal imaging: intensity versus lifetime-based FRET |
title_full | in vivo quantitative FRET small animal imaging: intensity versus lifetime-based FRET |
title_fullStr | in vivo quantitative FRET small animal imaging: intensity versus lifetime-based FRET |
title_full_unstemmed | in vivo quantitative FRET small animal imaging: intensity versus lifetime-based FRET |
title_short | in vivo quantitative FRET small animal imaging: intensity versus lifetime-based FRET |
title_sort | in vivo quantitative fret small animal imaging: intensity versus lifetime-based fret |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9900789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36747671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.24.525411 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithjasont invivoquantitativefretsmallanimalimagingintensityversuslifetimebasedfret AT sinsuebphonnattawut invivoquantitativefretsmallanimalimagingintensityversuslifetimebasedfret AT rudkouskayaalena invivoquantitativefretsmallanimalimagingintensityversuslifetimebasedfret AT michaletxavier invivoquantitativefretsmallanimalimagingintensityversuslifetimebasedfret AT intesxavier invivoquantitativefretsmallanimalimagingintensityversuslifetimebasedfret AT barrosomargarida invivoquantitativefretsmallanimalimagingintensityversuslifetimebasedfret |