Cargando…

A comprehensive immunohistochemical analysis of IMP2 and IMP3 in 542 cases of ovarian tumors

BACKGROUND: IMP2 and IMP3 are mRNA binding proteins involved in carcinogenesis. We examined a large cohort of ovarian tumors with the aim to assess the value of IMP2 and IMP3 for differential diagnosis, and to assess their prognostic significance. METHODS: Immunohistochemical analyses with antibodie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Němejcová, Kristýna, Bártů, Michaela Kendall, Michálková, Romana, Drozenová, Jana, Fabian, Pavel, Fadare, Oluwole, Hausnerová, Jitka, Laco, Jan, Matěj, Radoslav, Méhes, Gábor, Singh, Naveena, Stolnicu, Simona, Škapa, Petr, Švajdler, Marián, Stružinská, Ivana, Cibula, David, Kocian, Roman, Lax, Sigurd F., McCluggage, W. Glenn, Dundr, Pavel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9901072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36740684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13000-023-01300-4
_version_ 1784882967819059200
author Němejcová, Kristýna
Bártů, Michaela Kendall
Michálková, Romana
Drozenová, Jana
Fabian, Pavel
Fadare, Oluwole
Hausnerová, Jitka
Laco, Jan
Matěj, Radoslav
Méhes, Gábor
Singh, Naveena
Stolnicu, Simona
Škapa, Petr
Švajdler, Marián
Stružinská, Ivana
Cibula, David
Kocian, Roman
Lax, Sigurd F.
McCluggage, W. Glenn
Dundr, Pavel
author_facet Němejcová, Kristýna
Bártů, Michaela Kendall
Michálková, Romana
Drozenová, Jana
Fabian, Pavel
Fadare, Oluwole
Hausnerová, Jitka
Laco, Jan
Matěj, Radoslav
Méhes, Gábor
Singh, Naveena
Stolnicu, Simona
Škapa, Petr
Švajdler, Marián
Stružinská, Ivana
Cibula, David
Kocian, Roman
Lax, Sigurd F.
McCluggage, W. Glenn
Dundr, Pavel
author_sort Němejcová, Kristýna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: IMP2 and IMP3 are mRNA binding proteins involved in carcinogenesis. We examined a large cohort of ovarian tumors with the aim to assess the value of IMP2 and IMP3 for differential diagnosis, and to assess their prognostic significance. METHODS: Immunohistochemical analyses with antibodies against IMP2 and IMP3 were performed on 554 primary ovarian tumors including 114 high grade serous carcinomas, 100 low grade serous carcinomas, 124 clear cell carcinomas, 54 endometrioid carcinomas, 34 mucinous carcinomas, 75 mucinous borderline tumors, and 41 serous borderline tumors (micropapillary variant). The associations of overall positivity with clinicopathological characteristics were evaluated using the chi-squared test or Fisher’s Exact test. RESULTS: We found IMP2 expression (in more than 5% of tumor cells) in nearly all cases of all tumor types, so the prognostic meaning could not be analyzed. The positive IMP3 expression (in more than 5% of tumor cells) was most common in mucinous carcinomas (82%) and mucinous borderline tumors (81%), followed by high grade serous (67%) and clear cell carcinomas (67%). The expression was less frequent in endometrioid carcinomas (39%), low grade serous carcinomas (23%), and micropapillary variant of serous borderline tumors (20%). Prognostic significance of IMP3 could be evaluated only in low grade serous carcinomas in the case of relapse-free survival, where negative cases showed better RFS (p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: Concerning differential diagnosis our results imply that despite the differences in expression in the different ovarian tumor types, the practical value for diagnostic purposes is limited. Contrary to other solid tumors, we did not find prognostic significance of IMP3 in ovarian cancer, with the exception of RFS in low grade serous carcinomas. However, the high expression of IMP2 and IMP3 could be of predictive value in ovarian carcinomas since IMP proteins are potential therapeutical targets. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13000-023-01300-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9901072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99010722023-02-07 A comprehensive immunohistochemical analysis of IMP2 and IMP3 in 542 cases of ovarian tumors Němejcová, Kristýna Bártů, Michaela Kendall Michálková, Romana Drozenová, Jana Fabian, Pavel Fadare, Oluwole Hausnerová, Jitka Laco, Jan Matěj, Radoslav Méhes, Gábor Singh, Naveena Stolnicu, Simona Škapa, Petr Švajdler, Marián Stružinská, Ivana Cibula, David Kocian, Roman Lax, Sigurd F. McCluggage, W. Glenn Dundr, Pavel Diagn Pathol Research BACKGROUND: IMP2 and IMP3 are mRNA binding proteins involved in carcinogenesis. We examined a large cohort of ovarian tumors with the aim to assess the value of IMP2 and IMP3 for differential diagnosis, and to assess their prognostic significance. METHODS: Immunohistochemical analyses with antibodies against IMP2 and IMP3 were performed on 554 primary ovarian tumors including 114 high grade serous carcinomas, 100 low grade serous carcinomas, 124 clear cell carcinomas, 54 endometrioid carcinomas, 34 mucinous carcinomas, 75 mucinous borderline tumors, and 41 serous borderline tumors (micropapillary variant). The associations of overall positivity with clinicopathological characteristics were evaluated using the chi-squared test or Fisher’s Exact test. RESULTS: We found IMP2 expression (in more than 5% of tumor cells) in nearly all cases of all tumor types, so the prognostic meaning could not be analyzed. The positive IMP3 expression (in more than 5% of tumor cells) was most common in mucinous carcinomas (82%) and mucinous borderline tumors (81%), followed by high grade serous (67%) and clear cell carcinomas (67%). The expression was less frequent in endometrioid carcinomas (39%), low grade serous carcinomas (23%), and micropapillary variant of serous borderline tumors (20%). Prognostic significance of IMP3 could be evaluated only in low grade serous carcinomas in the case of relapse-free survival, where negative cases showed better RFS (p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: Concerning differential diagnosis our results imply that despite the differences in expression in the different ovarian tumor types, the practical value for diagnostic purposes is limited. Contrary to other solid tumors, we did not find prognostic significance of IMP3 in ovarian cancer, with the exception of RFS in low grade serous carcinomas. However, the high expression of IMP2 and IMP3 could be of predictive value in ovarian carcinomas since IMP proteins are potential therapeutical targets. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13000-023-01300-4. BioMed Central 2023-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9901072/ /pubmed/36740684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13000-023-01300-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Němejcová, Kristýna
Bártů, Michaela Kendall
Michálková, Romana
Drozenová, Jana
Fabian, Pavel
Fadare, Oluwole
Hausnerová, Jitka
Laco, Jan
Matěj, Radoslav
Méhes, Gábor
Singh, Naveena
Stolnicu, Simona
Škapa, Petr
Švajdler, Marián
Stružinská, Ivana
Cibula, David
Kocian, Roman
Lax, Sigurd F.
McCluggage, W. Glenn
Dundr, Pavel
A comprehensive immunohistochemical analysis of IMP2 and IMP3 in 542 cases of ovarian tumors
title A comprehensive immunohistochemical analysis of IMP2 and IMP3 in 542 cases of ovarian tumors
title_full A comprehensive immunohistochemical analysis of IMP2 and IMP3 in 542 cases of ovarian tumors
title_fullStr A comprehensive immunohistochemical analysis of IMP2 and IMP3 in 542 cases of ovarian tumors
title_full_unstemmed A comprehensive immunohistochemical analysis of IMP2 and IMP3 in 542 cases of ovarian tumors
title_short A comprehensive immunohistochemical analysis of IMP2 and IMP3 in 542 cases of ovarian tumors
title_sort comprehensive immunohistochemical analysis of imp2 and imp3 in 542 cases of ovarian tumors
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9901072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36740684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13000-023-01300-4
work_keys_str_mv AT nemejcovakristyna acomprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT bartumichaelakendall acomprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT michalkovaromana acomprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT drozenovajana acomprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT fabianpavel acomprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT fadareoluwole acomprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT hausnerovajitka acomprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT lacojan acomprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT matejradoslav acomprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT mehesgabor acomprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT singhnaveena acomprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT stolnicusimona acomprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT skapapetr acomprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT svajdlermarian acomprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT struzinskaivana acomprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT cibuladavid acomprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT kocianroman acomprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT laxsigurdf acomprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT mccluggagewglenn acomprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT dundrpavel acomprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT nemejcovakristyna comprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT bartumichaelakendall comprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT michalkovaromana comprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT drozenovajana comprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT fabianpavel comprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT fadareoluwole comprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT hausnerovajitka comprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT lacojan comprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT matejradoslav comprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT mehesgabor comprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT singhnaveena comprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT stolnicusimona comprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT skapapetr comprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT svajdlermarian comprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT struzinskaivana comprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT cibuladavid comprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT kocianroman comprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT laxsigurdf comprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT mccluggagewglenn comprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors
AT dundrpavel comprehensiveimmunohistochemicalanalysisofimp2andimp3in542casesofovariantumors