Cargando…

De novo transcriptome assemblies of C(3) and C(4) non-model grass species reveal key differences in leaf development

BACKGROUND: C(4) photosynthesis is a mechanism that plants have evolved to reduce the rate of photorespiration during the carbon fixation process. The C(4) pathway allows plants to adapt to high temperatures and light while more efficiently using resources, such as water and nitrogen. Despite decade...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prochetto, Santiago, Studer, Anthony J., Reinheimer, Renata
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9901097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36747121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08995-7
_version_ 1784882973109125120
author Prochetto, Santiago
Studer, Anthony J.
Reinheimer, Renata
author_facet Prochetto, Santiago
Studer, Anthony J.
Reinheimer, Renata
author_sort Prochetto, Santiago
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: C(4) photosynthesis is a mechanism that plants have evolved to reduce the rate of photorespiration during the carbon fixation process. The C(4) pathway allows plants to adapt to high temperatures and light while more efficiently using resources, such as water and nitrogen. Despite decades of studies, the evolution of the C(4) pathway from a C(3) ancestor remains a biological enigma. Interestingly, species with C(3)-C(4) intermediates photosynthesis are usually found closely related to the C(4) lineages. Indeed, current models indicate that the assembly of C(4) photosynthesis was a gradual process that included the relocalization of photorespiratory enzymes, and the establishment of intermediate photosynthesis subtypes. More than a third of the C(4) origins occurred within the grass family (Poaceae). In particular, the Otachyriinae subtribe (Paspaleae tribe) includes 35 American species from C(3), C(4), and intermediates taxa making it an interesting lineage to answer questions about the evolution of photosynthesis. RESULTS: To explore the molecular mechanisms that underpin the evolution of C(4) photosynthesis, the transcriptomic dynamics along four different leaf segments, that capture different stages of development, were compared among Otachyriinae non-model species. For this, leaf transcriptomes were sequenced, de novo assembled, and annotated. Gene expression patterns of key pathways along the leaf segments showed distinct differences between photosynthetic subtypes. In addition, genes associated with photorespiration and the C(4) cycle were differentially expressed between C(4) and C(3) species, but their expression patterns were well preserved throughout leaf development. CONCLUSIONS: New, high-confidence, protein-coding leaf transcriptomes were generated using high-throughput short-read sequencing. These transcriptomes expand what is currently known about gene expression in leaves of non-model grass species. We found conserved expression patterns of C(4) cycle and photorespiratory genes among C(3), intermediate, and C(4) species, suggesting a prerequisite for the evolution of C(4) photosynthesis. This dataset represents a valuable contribution to the existing genomic resources and provides new tools for future investigation of photosynthesis evolution. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-022-08995-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9901097
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99010972023-02-07 De novo transcriptome assemblies of C(3) and C(4) non-model grass species reveal key differences in leaf development Prochetto, Santiago Studer, Anthony J. Reinheimer, Renata BMC Genomics Research BACKGROUND: C(4) photosynthesis is a mechanism that plants have evolved to reduce the rate of photorespiration during the carbon fixation process. The C(4) pathway allows plants to adapt to high temperatures and light while more efficiently using resources, such as water and nitrogen. Despite decades of studies, the evolution of the C(4) pathway from a C(3) ancestor remains a biological enigma. Interestingly, species with C(3)-C(4) intermediates photosynthesis are usually found closely related to the C(4) lineages. Indeed, current models indicate that the assembly of C(4) photosynthesis was a gradual process that included the relocalization of photorespiratory enzymes, and the establishment of intermediate photosynthesis subtypes. More than a third of the C(4) origins occurred within the grass family (Poaceae). In particular, the Otachyriinae subtribe (Paspaleae tribe) includes 35 American species from C(3), C(4), and intermediates taxa making it an interesting lineage to answer questions about the evolution of photosynthesis. RESULTS: To explore the molecular mechanisms that underpin the evolution of C(4) photosynthesis, the transcriptomic dynamics along four different leaf segments, that capture different stages of development, were compared among Otachyriinae non-model species. For this, leaf transcriptomes were sequenced, de novo assembled, and annotated. Gene expression patterns of key pathways along the leaf segments showed distinct differences between photosynthetic subtypes. In addition, genes associated with photorespiration and the C(4) cycle were differentially expressed between C(4) and C(3) species, but their expression patterns were well preserved throughout leaf development. CONCLUSIONS: New, high-confidence, protein-coding leaf transcriptomes were generated using high-throughput short-read sequencing. These transcriptomes expand what is currently known about gene expression in leaves of non-model grass species. We found conserved expression patterns of C(4) cycle and photorespiratory genes among C(3), intermediate, and C(4) species, suggesting a prerequisite for the evolution of C(4) photosynthesis. This dataset represents a valuable contribution to the existing genomic resources and provides new tools for future investigation of photosynthesis evolution. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-022-08995-7. BioMed Central 2023-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9901097/ /pubmed/36747121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08995-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Prochetto, Santiago
Studer, Anthony J.
Reinheimer, Renata
De novo transcriptome assemblies of C(3) and C(4) non-model grass species reveal key differences in leaf development
title De novo transcriptome assemblies of C(3) and C(4) non-model grass species reveal key differences in leaf development
title_full De novo transcriptome assemblies of C(3) and C(4) non-model grass species reveal key differences in leaf development
title_fullStr De novo transcriptome assemblies of C(3) and C(4) non-model grass species reveal key differences in leaf development
title_full_unstemmed De novo transcriptome assemblies of C(3) and C(4) non-model grass species reveal key differences in leaf development
title_short De novo transcriptome assemblies of C(3) and C(4) non-model grass species reveal key differences in leaf development
title_sort de novo transcriptome assemblies of c(3) and c(4) non-model grass species reveal key differences in leaf development
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9901097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36747121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08995-7
work_keys_str_mv AT prochettosantiago denovotranscriptomeassembliesofc3andc4nonmodelgrassspeciesrevealkeydifferencesinleafdevelopment
AT studeranthonyj denovotranscriptomeassembliesofc3andc4nonmodelgrassspeciesrevealkeydifferencesinleafdevelopment
AT reinheimerrenata denovotranscriptomeassembliesofc3andc4nonmodelgrassspeciesrevealkeydifferencesinleafdevelopment