Cargando…

Management of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant Community Screenings in Shanghai, China: A Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND: Community screening for SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant plays a significant role in controlling the spread of infection. However, loopholes may exist in the current management of community screening in Shanghai, China. The objective of this study was to discover loopholes in the management of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Keyu, Xu, Bin, Tang, Yifan, Cao, Juan, Wang, Rong, Tian, Yali, Gao, Chunhong, Chu, Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9901467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36755747
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S392697
_version_ 1784883034949943296
author Chen, Keyu
Xu, Bin
Tang, Yifan
Cao, Juan
Wang, Rong
Tian, Yali
Gao, Chunhong
Chu, Ming
author_facet Chen, Keyu
Xu, Bin
Tang, Yifan
Cao, Juan
Wang, Rong
Tian, Yali
Gao, Chunhong
Chu, Ming
author_sort Chen, Keyu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Community screening for SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant plays a significant role in controlling the spread of infection. However, loopholes may exist in the current management of community screening in Shanghai, China. The objective of this study was to discover loopholes in the management of community screening for SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in Shanghai, China and provide targeted solutions. METHODS: The cross-sectional study was carried out April 4 to April 30, 2021, among residential committee directors from the Putuo District, Pudong District, and Minhang District of Shanghai, China. Data were collected using a self-designed questionnaire about the management of nucleic acid testing (NAT) sampling in communities through the network platform powered by www.wjx.cn. RESULTS: A total of 203 residential committee directors responded to the survey. Of them, 47.3% were not accepted training and 40.4% were not aware of cross-infection. Comparison among sampling sites and communities, high-risk group contained lower proportion of community training (P = 0.093~0.200), higher awareness of cross-infection (P = 0.039~0.777), more medical workers (P = 0.007~0.724) and more tests performed (P = 0.001~0.992). Larger communities had more medical workers, sampling sites, sampling tables (P = 0.000) and higher awareness of cross-infection (P = 0.009), but lower proportion of community training (P = 0.051). CONCLUSION: Overall, community training and awareness of infection control were inadequate. Government or institutions should organize the community training and raise the awareness of infection control. Significant differences exist in NAT management patterns between sampling sites, as well as communities of different sizes. Residential community directors minimize high-risk sampling point settings in the future. Special personnel designated by the government or institutions should tour to guide each sampling site.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9901467
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99014672023-02-07 Management of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant Community Screenings in Shanghai, China: A Cross-Sectional Study Chen, Keyu Xu, Bin Tang, Yifan Cao, Juan Wang, Rong Tian, Yali Gao, Chunhong Chu, Ming Risk Manag Healthc Policy Original Research BACKGROUND: Community screening for SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant plays a significant role in controlling the spread of infection. However, loopholes may exist in the current management of community screening in Shanghai, China. The objective of this study was to discover loopholes in the management of community screening for SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in Shanghai, China and provide targeted solutions. METHODS: The cross-sectional study was carried out April 4 to April 30, 2021, among residential committee directors from the Putuo District, Pudong District, and Minhang District of Shanghai, China. Data were collected using a self-designed questionnaire about the management of nucleic acid testing (NAT) sampling in communities through the network platform powered by www.wjx.cn. RESULTS: A total of 203 residential committee directors responded to the survey. Of them, 47.3% were not accepted training and 40.4% were not aware of cross-infection. Comparison among sampling sites and communities, high-risk group contained lower proportion of community training (P = 0.093~0.200), higher awareness of cross-infection (P = 0.039~0.777), more medical workers (P = 0.007~0.724) and more tests performed (P = 0.001~0.992). Larger communities had more medical workers, sampling sites, sampling tables (P = 0.000) and higher awareness of cross-infection (P = 0.009), but lower proportion of community training (P = 0.051). CONCLUSION: Overall, community training and awareness of infection control were inadequate. Government or institutions should organize the community training and raise the awareness of infection control. Significant differences exist in NAT management patterns between sampling sites, as well as communities of different sizes. Residential community directors minimize high-risk sampling point settings in the future. Special personnel designated by the government or institutions should tour to guide each sampling site. Dove 2023-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9901467/ /pubmed/36755747 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S392697 Text en © 2023 Chen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Chen, Keyu
Xu, Bin
Tang, Yifan
Cao, Juan
Wang, Rong
Tian, Yali
Gao, Chunhong
Chu, Ming
Management of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant Community Screenings in Shanghai, China: A Cross-Sectional Study
title Management of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant Community Screenings in Shanghai, China: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Management of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant Community Screenings in Shanghai, China: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Management of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant Community Screenings in Shanghai, China: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Management of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant Community Screenings in Shanghai, China: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Management of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant Community Screenings in Shanghai, China: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort management of sars-cov-2 omicron variant community screenings in shanghai, china: a cross-sectional study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9901467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36755747
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S392697
work_keys_str_mv AT chenkeyu managementofsarscov2omicronvariantcommunityscreeningsinshanghaichinaacrosssectionalstudy
AT xubin managementofsarscov2omicronvariantcommunityscreeningsinshanghaichinaacrosssectionalstudy
AT tangyifan managementofsarscov2omicronvariantcommunityscreeningsinshanghaichinaacrosssectionalstudy
AT caojuan managementofsarscov2omicronvariantcommunityscreeningsinshanghaichinaacrosssectionalstudy
AT wangrong managementofsarscov2omicronvariantcommunityscreeningsinshanghaichinaacrosssectionalstudy
AT tianyali managementofsarscov2omicronvariantcommunityscreeningsinshanghaichinaacrosssectionalstudy
AT gaochunhong managementofsarscov2omicronvariantcommunityscreeningsinshanghaichinaacrosssectionalstudy
AT chuming managementofsarscov2omicronvariantcommunityscreeningsinshanghaichinaacrosssectionalstudy