Cargando…
D-dimer levels in non-COVID-19 ARDS and COVID-19 ARDS patients: A systematic review with meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Hypercoagulability and thrombo-inflammation are the main reasons for death in COVID-19 patients. It is unclear whether there is a difference between D-dimer levels in patients without or with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9901787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36745595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277000 |
_version_ | 1784883096117575680 |
---|---|
author | Tóth, Krisztina Fresilli, Stefano Paoli, Nicola Maiucci, Giacomo Salvioni, Mariateresa Kotani, Yuki Katzenschlager, Stephan Weigand, Markus A. Landoni, Giovanni |
author_facet | Tóth, Krisztina Fresilli, Stefano Paoli, Nicola Maiucci, Giacomo Salvioni, Mariateresa Kotani, Yuki Katzenschlager, Stephan Weigand, Markus A. Landoni, Giovanni |
author_sort | Tóth, Krisztina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hypercoagulability and thrombo-inflammation are the main reasons for death in COVID-19 patients. It is unclear whether there is a difference between D-dimer levels in patients without or with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrails.gov databases looking for studies reporting D-dimer levels in patients without or with COVID-19 ARDS. Secondary endpoints included length of hospital stay, and mortality data at the longest follow-up available. RESULTS: We included 12 retrospective and 3 prospective studies with overall 2,828 patients, of whom 1,404 (49.6%) had non-COVID-19 ARDS and 1,424 had COVID-19 ARDS. D-dimer levels were not significantly higher in non-COVID-19 ARDS than in COVID-19 ARDS patients (mean 7.65 mg/L vs. mean 6.20 mg/L MD 0.88 [CI: -0.61 to 2.38] p = 0.25; I² = 85%) while the length of hospital stay was shorter (non-COVID-19 mean 37.4 days vs. COVID-19 mean 48.5 days, MD -10.92 [CI: -16.71 to -5.14] p < 0.001; I² = 44%). No difference in mortality was observed: non-COVID-19 ARDS 418/1167 (35.8%) vs. COVID-19 ARDS 467/1201 (38.8%). CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference in the mean D-dimer levels between non-COVID-19 ARDS and COVID-19 ARDS patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9901787 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99017872023-02-07 D-dimer levels in non-COVID-19 ARDS and COVID-19 ARDS patients: A systematic review with meta-analysis Tóth, Krisztina Fresilli, Stefano Paoli, Nicola Maiucci, Giacomo Salvioni, Mariateresa Kotani, Yuki Katzenschlager, Stephan Weigand, Markus A. Landoni, Giovanni PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Hypercoagulability and thrombo-inflammation are the main reasons for death in COVID-19 patients. It is unclear whether there is a difference between D-dimer levels in patients without or with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrails.gov databases looking for studies reporting D-dimer levels in patients without or with COVID-19 ARDS. Secondary endpoints included length of hospital stay, and mortality data at the longest follow-up available. RESULTS: We included 12 retrospective and 3 prospective studies with overall 2,828 patients, of whom 1,404 (49.6%) had non-COVID-19 ARDS and 1,424 had COVID-19 ARDS. D-dimer levels were not significantly higher in non-COVID-19 ARDS than in COVID-19 ARDS patients (mean 7.65 mg/L vs. mean 6.20 mg/L MD 0.88 [CI: -0.61 to 2.38] p = 0.25; I² = 85%) while the length of hospital stay was shorter (non-COVID-19 mean 37.4 days vs. COVID-19 mean 48.5 days, MD -10.92 [CI: -16.71 to -5.14] p < 0.001; I² = 44%). No difference in mortality was observed: non-COVID-19 ARDS 418/1167 (35.8%) vs. COVID-19 ARDS 467/1201 (38.8%). CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference in the mean D-dimer levels between non-COVID-19 ARDS and COVID-19 ARDS patients. Public Library of Science 2023-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9901787/ /pubmed/36745595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277000 Text en © 2023 Tóth et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tóth, Krisztina Fresilli, Stefano Paoli, Nicola Maiucci, Giacomo Salvioni, Mariateresa Kotani, Yuki Katzenschlager, Stephan Weigand, Markus A. Landoni, Giovanni D-dimer levels in non-COVID-19 ARDS and COVID-19 ARDS patients: A systematic review with meta-analysis |
title | D-dimer levels in non-COVID-19 ARDS and COVID-19 ARDS patients: A systematic review with meta-analysis |
title_full | D-dimer levels in non-COVID-19 ARDS and COVID-19 ARDS patients: A systematic review with meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | D-dimer levels in non-COVID-19 ARDS and COVID-19 ARDS patients: A systematic review with meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | D-dimer levels in non-COVID-19 ARDS and COVID-19 ARDS patients: A systematic review with meta-analysis |
title_short | D-dimer levels in non-COVID-19 ARDS and COVID-19 ARDS patients: A systematic review with meta-analysis |
title_sort | d-dimer levels in non-covid-19 ards and covid-19 ards patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9901787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36745595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277000 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tothkrisztina ddimerlevelsinnoncovid19ardsandcovid19ardspatientsasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT fresillistefano ddimerlevelsinnoncovid19ardsandcovid19ardspatientsasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT paolinicola ddimerlevelsinnoncovid19ardsandcovid19ardspatientsasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT maiuccigiacomo ddimerlevelsinnoncovid19ardsandcovid19ardspatientsasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT salvionimariateresa ddimerlevelsinnoncovid19ardsandcovid19ardspatientsasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT kotaniyuki ddimerlevelsinnoncovid19ardsandcovid19ardspatientsasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT katzenschlagerstephan ddimerlevelsinnoncovid19ardsandcovid19ardspatientsasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT weigandmarkusa ddimerlevelsinnoncovid19ardsandcovid19ardspatientsasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT landonigiovanni ddimerlevelsinnoncovid19ardsandcovid19ardspatientsasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis |