Cargando…
Do the research priorities identified in SAGES Delphi studies resonate with rural general surgeons: a Washington state perspective
BACKGROUND: Rural surgeons operate in an environment significantly different from that of their colleagues, and as such they face unique challenges. We hypothesized the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) research agenda (as identified in the results of the 2014 Delp...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9901825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36746816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09811-9 |
_version_ | 1784883105232846848 |
---|---|
author | Lewis, Sarah Hoppe, Athena Larson, Katelyn Lobova, Veronika Kumar, Anjali |
author_facet | Lewis, Sarah Hoppe, Athena Larson, Katelyn Lobova, Veronika Kumar, Anjali |
author_sort | Lewis, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Rural surgeons operate in an environment significantly different from that of their colleagues, and as such they face unique challenges. We hypothesized the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) research agenda (as identified in the results of the 2014 Delphi study) will differ in its priorities from those identified by rural surgeons. We aimed to pilot a study in Washington state that could be replicated in other areas of the USA and the world. METHODS: We identified general surgeons working at rural critical access hospitals in the state of Washington. We then conducted virtual, semi-structured interviews and followed up with surveys and site visits. The survey included the 2014 SAGES Delphi-ranked research priorities. We asked rural surgeons to rank their top 5 of these 40 priorities and to detail any additional which were not on the list. RESULTS: We contacted 79 surgeons with a 30% response rate. We conducted 25 semi-structured interviews and received 18 completed follow-up surveys. These interviews were followed by site visits at 4 of the 23 sites. Of the original Delphi research priorities, those most cited by rural surgeons were #8 (“What is the best method for incorporating new techniques and technology for surgeons of variable levels of experience or training?”) and #1 (“How do we best train, assess, and maintain proficiency of surgeons and surgical trainees in flexible endoscopy, laparoscopy, and open surgery?”). Four surgeons included the last SAGES priority (#40 “Is quality of life improved after ventral hernia repair?”) among their top 5. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that although rural surgeons’ research priorities align with the published SAGES Delphi survey, these surgeons rank the priorities differently. This may be because the predominant study population of the Delphi is SAGES membership who work in urban and academic centers. Plans for future SAGES Delphi survey could capture these unique priorities by intentional involvement of rural and community surgeons. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09811-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9901825 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99018252023-02-07 Do the research priorities identified in SAGES Delphi studies resonate with rural general surgeons: a Washington state perspective Lewis, Sarah Hoppe, Athena Larson, Katelyn Lobova, Veronika Kumar, Anjali Surg Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND: Rural surgeons operate in an environment significantly different from that of their colleagues, and as such they face unique challenges. We hypothesized the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) research agenda (as identified in the results of the 2014 Delphi study) will differ in its priorities from those identified by rural surgeons. We aimed to pilot a study in Washington state that could be replicated in other areas of the USA and the world. METHODS: We identified general surgeons working at rural critical access hospitals in the state of Washington. We then conducted virtual, semi-structured interviews and followed up with surveys and site visits. The survey included the 2014 SAGES Delphi-ranked research priorities. We asked rural surgeons to rank their top 5 of these 40 priorities and to detail any additional which were not on the list. RESULTS: We contacted 79 surgeons with a 30% response rate. We conducted 25 semi-structured interviews and received 18 completed follow-up surveys. These interviews were followed by site visits at 4 of the 23 sites. Of the original Delphi research priorities, those most cited by rural surgeons were #8 (“What is the best method for incorporating new techniques and technology for surgeons of variable levels of experience or training?”) and #1 (“How do we best train, assess, and maintain proficiency of surgeons and surgical trainees in flexible endoscopy, laparoscopy, and open surgery?”). Four surgeons included the last SAGES priority (#40 “Is quality of life improved after ventral hernia repair?”) among their top 5. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that although rural surgeons’ research priorities align with the published SAGES Delphi survey, these surgeons rank the priorities differently. This may be because the predominant study population of the Delphi is SAGES membership who work in urban and academic centers. Plans for future SAGES Delphi survey could capture these unique priorities by intentional involvement of rural and community surgeons. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09811-9. Springer US 2023-02-06 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9901825/ /pubmed/36746816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09811-9 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lewis, Sarah Hoppe, Athena Larson, Katelyn Lobova, Veronika Kumar, Anjali Do the research priorities identified in SAGES Delphi studies resonate with rural general surgeons: a Washington state perspective |
title | Do the research priorities identified in SAGES Delphi studies resonate with rural general surgeons: a Washington state perspective |
title_full | Do the research priorities identified in SAGES Delphi studies resonate with rural general surgeons: a Washington state perspective |
title_fullStr | Do the research priorities identified in SAGES Delphi studies resonate with rural general surgeons: a Washington state perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Do the research priorities identified in SAGES Delphi studies resonate with rural general surgeons: a Washington state perspective |
title_short | Do the research priorities identified in SAGES Delphi studies resonate with rural general surgeons: a Washington state perspective |
title_sort | do the research priorities identified in sages delphi studies resonate with rural general surgeons: a washington state perspective |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9901825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36746816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09811-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lewissarah dotheresearchprioritiesidentifiedinsagesdelphistudiesresonatewithruralgeneralsurgeonsawashingtonstateperspective AT hoppeathena dotheresearchprioritiesidentifiedinsagesdelphistudiesresonatewithruralgeneralsurgeonsawashingtonstateperspective AT larsonkatelyn dotheresearchprioritiesidentifiedinsagesdelphistudiesresonatewithruralgeneralsurgeonsawashingtonstateperspective AT lobovaveronika dotheresearchprioritiesidentifiedinsagesdelphistudiesresonatewithruralgeneralsurgeonsawashingtonstateperspective AT kumaranjali dotheresearchprioritiesidentifiedinsagesdelphistudiesresonatewithruralgeneralsurgeonsawashingtonstateperspective |