Cargando…

Comparison of the effects of 2 frequencies of application of photobiomodulation on facial rejuvenation: Controlled, randomized, and double-blind clinical trial

Skin aging is an irreversible, slow and progressive process, mainly influenced by age, but also by external factors such as ultraviolet radiation, smoking, and alcohol, among others. It is increasingly common to look for procedures that slow down skin aging by limiting or hiding its effects on appea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bragato, Erick Frank, Pires, Jefferson André, Momolli, Marcos, Guerra, Marina Bertoni, Paisano, Adriana Fernandes, Ferrari, Raquel Agnelli Mesquita, Bussadori, Sandra Kalil, Motta, Lara Jansiski, Fernandes, Kristianne Porta Santos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9902007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36749255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032514
_version_ 1784883153281744896
author Bragato, Erick Frank
Pires, Jefferson André
Momolli, Marcos
Guerra, Marina Bertoni
Paisano, Adriana Fernandes
Ferrari, Raquel Agnelli Mesquita
Bussadori, Sandra Kalil
Motta, Lara Jansiski
Fernandes, Kristianne Porta Santos
author_facet Bragato, Erick Frank
Pires, Jefferson André
Momolli, Marcos
Guerra, Marina Bertoni
Paisano, Adriana Fernandes
Ferrari, Raquel Agnelli Mesquita
Bussadori, Sandra Kalil
Motta, Lara Jansiski
Fernandes, Kristianne Porta Santos
author_sort Bragato, Erick Frank
collection PubMed
description Skin aging is an irreversible, slow and progressive process, mainly influenced by age, but also by external factors such as ultraviolet radiation, smoking, and alcohol, among others. It is increasingly common to look for procedures that slow down skin aging by limiting or hiding its effects on appearance. Studies have shown the benefits of photobiomodulation (PBM) for the skin, especially with the use of red light-emitting diodes. However, there is a high level of variability in the treatment parameters and frequency of application. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The objective of this study is to compare the effects of PBM with a light-emitting diode mask (660 nm, 6.4 mW/ cm², 8,02 J/ cm², 5.02 mW, 21 minutes) on facial rejuvenation using 2 frequency applications for 4 weeks: one group will receive PBM application on the face, twice a week and another group will receive PBM application 3 times a week. A group with simulated PBM applied twice a week for 4 weeks will be used as a control. The treatment will be performed on female participants aged between 45 and 60 years. After 4 weeks, evaluations of photographic images by specialists (Wrinkle Assessment Scale) as well as the quantitative analysis of the wrinkle size by the Image J software, the depth and width of wrinkles (assessment of face impressions by optical coherence tomography) and the level of Satisfaction with Facial Appearance Overall will be compared with data collected before the start of the study. All data will be analyzed statistically according to their distribution, seeking a level of statistical significance of 0.05. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Nove de Julho University (acceptance number: 4.365.565). This trial has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04911140). This study is recruiting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9902007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99020072023-02-08 Comparison of the effects of 2 frequencies of application of photobiomodulation on facial rejuvenation: Controlled, randomized, and double-blind clinical trial Bragato, Erick Frank Pires, Jefferson André Momolli, Marcos Guerra, Marina Bertoni Paisano, Adriana Fernandes Ferrari, Raquel Agnelli Mesquita Bussadori, Sandra Kalil Motta, Lara Jansiski Fernandes, Kristianne Porta Santos Medicine (Baltimore) 3700 Skin aging is an irreversible, slow and progressive process, mainly influenced by age, but also by external factors such as ultraviolet radiation, smoking, and alcohol, among others. It is increasingly common to look for procedures that slow down skin aging by limiting or hiding its effects on appearance. Studies have shown the benefits of photobiomodulation (PBM) for the skin, especially with the use of red light-emitting diodes. However, there is a high level of variability in the treatment parameters and frequency of application. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The objective of this study is to compare the effects of PBM with a light-emitting diode mask (660 nm, 6.4 mW/ cm², 8,02 J/ cm², 5.02 mW, 21 minutes) on facial rejuvenation using 2 frequency applications for 4 weeks: one group will receive PBM application on the face, twice a week and another group will receive PBM application 3 times a week. A group with simulated PBM applied twice a week for 4 weeks will be used as a control. The treatment will be performed on female participants aged between 45 and 60 years. After 4 weeks, evaluations of photographic images by specialists (Wrinkle Assessment Scale) as well as the quantitative analysis of the wrinkle size by the Image J software, the depth and width of wrinkles (assessment of face impressions by optical coherence tomography) and the level of Satisfaction with Facial Appearance Overall will be compared with data collected before the start of the study. All data will be analyzed statistically according to their distribution, seeking a level of statistical significance of 0.05. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Nove de Julho University (acceptance number: 4.365.565). This trial has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04911140). This study is recruiting. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9902007/ /pubmed/36749255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032514 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle 3700
Bragato, Erick Frank
Pires, Jefferson André
Momolli, Marcos
Guerra, Marina Bertoni
Paisano, Adriana Fernandes
Ferrari, Raquel Agnelli Mesquita
Bussadori, Sandra Kalil
Motta, Lara Jansiski
Fernandes, Kristianne Porta Santos
Comparison of the effects of 2 frequencies of application of photobiomodulation on facial rejuvenation: Controlled, randomized, and double-blind clinical trial
title Comparison of the effects of 2 frequencies of application of photobiomodulation on facial rejuvenation: Controlled, randomized, and double-blind clinical trial
title_full Comparison of the effects of 2 frequencies of application of photobiomodulation on facial rejuvenation: Controlled, randomized, and double-blind clinical trial
title_fullStr Comparison of the effects of 2 frequencies of application of photobiomodulation on facial rejuvenation: Controlled, randomized, and double-blind clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the effects of 2 frequencies of application of photobiomodulation on facial rejuvenation: Controlled, randomized, and double-blind clinical trial
title_short Comparison of the effects of 2 frequencies of application of photobiomodulation on facial rejuvenation: Controlled, randomized, and double-blind clinical trial
title_sort comparison of the effects of 2 frequencies of application of photobiomodulation on facial rejuvenation: controlled, randomized, and double-blind clinical trial
topic 3700
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9902007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36749255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032514
work_keys_str_mv AT bragatoerickfrank comparisonoftheeffectsof2frequenciesofapplicationofphotobiomodulationonfacialrejuvenationcontrolledrandomizedanddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT piresjeffersonandre comparisonoftheeffectsof2frequenciesofapplicationofphotobiomodulationonfacialrejuvenationcontrolledrandomizedanddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT momollimarcos comparisonoftheeffectsof2frequenciesofapplicationofphotobiomodulationonfacialrejuvenationcontrolledrandomizedanddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT guerramarinabertoni comparisonoftheeffectsof2frequenciesofapplicationofphotobiomodulationonfacialrejuvenationcontrolledrandomizedanddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT paisanoadrianafernandes comparisonoftheeffectsof2frequenciesofapplicationofphotobiomodulationonfacialrejuvenationcontrolledrandomizedanddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT ferrariraquelagnellimesquita comparisonoftheeffectsof2frequenciesofapplicationofphotobiomodulationonfacialrejuvenationcontrolledrandomizedanddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT bussadorisandrakalil comparisonoftheeffectsof2frequenciesofapplicationofphotobiomodulationonfacialrejuvenationcontrolledrandomizedanddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT mottalarajansiski comparisonoftheeffectsof2frequenciesofapplicationofphotobiomodulationonfacialrejuvenationcontrolledrandomizedanddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT fernandeskristianneportasantos comparisonoftheeffectsof2frequenciesofapplicationofphotobiomodulationonfacialrejuvenationcontrolledrandomizedanddoubleblindclinicaltrial