Cargando…

Is “Initial Size of the Graft the Real Culprit behind Primary Contraction of Full-Thickness Skin Graft”? – A Cross-Sectional Study

Background  Primary contraction of full-thickness graft has been traditionally quoted to be 40%. There are lacunae in literature to elaborate on the factors influencing it ever since. Methods  About 75 subjects who underwent full-thickness grafting procedures to resurface small defects were included...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vathulya, Madhubari, Rao, Shalinee, Malik, Akanksha, Sinha, Smita, Kumar, Nikhilesh, Kapoor, Akshay, Bahurupi, Yogesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9902097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36755654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1756297
Descripción
Sumario:Background  Primary contraction of full-thickness graft has been traditionally quoted to be 40%. There are lacunae in literature to elaborate on the factors influencing it ever since. Methods  About 75 subjects who underwent full-thickness grafting procedures to resurface small defects were included in the study. The initial and final graft dimensions after primary contraction were traced on X-ray templates and the percentage of contraction was evaluated using the graphical method. This was further correlated with age, collagen, elastic matrix metalloproteinases-1 (MMP-1) and -2 content along with dermal thickness of the skin specimen sent from the graft. Results  The primary contraction of the graft had a very significant correlation only with the initial size of graft harvested with a linear regression of 33.3% and a Spearman's correlation of 0.587 significant at a p -value of 0.001. Conclusion  This study though preliminary tries to highlight an important factor that primary contraction of grafts is a physical phenomenon independent of its contents like collagen, elastin, or MMP-1 and -2 or age and dependent on its initial size of harvest instead.