Cargando…

Is “Initial Size of the Graft the Real Culprit behind Primary Contraction of Full-Thickness Skin Graft”? – A Cross-Sectional Study

Background  Primary contraction of full-thickness graft has been traditionally quoted to be 40%. There are lacunae in literature to elaborate on the factors influencing it ever since. Methods  About 75 subjects who underwent full-thickness grafting procedures to resurface small defects were included...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vathulya, Madhubari, Rao, Shalinee, Malik, Akanksha, Sinha, Smita, Kumar, Nikhilesh, Kapoor, Akshay, Bahurupi, Yogesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9902097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36755654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1756297
_version_ 1784883183672623104
author Vathulya, Madhubari
Rao, Shalinee
Malik, Akanksha
Sinha, Smita
Kumar, Nikhilesh
Kapoor, Akshay
Bahurupi, Yogesh
author_facet Vathulya, Madhubari
Rao, Shalinee
Malik, Akanksha
Sinha, Smita
Kumar, Nikhilesh
Kapoor, Akshay
Bahurupi, Yogesh
author_sort Vathulya, Madhubari
collection PubMed
description Background  Primary contraction of full-thickness graft has been traditionally quoted to be 40%. There are lacunae in literature to elaborate on the factors influencing it ever since. Methods  About 75 subjects who underwent full-thickness grafting procedures to resurface small defects were included in the study. The initial and final graft dimensions after primary contraction were traced on X-ray templates and the percentage of contraction was evaluated using the graphical method. This was further correlated with age, collagen, elastic matrix metalloproteinases-1 (MMP-1) and -2 content along with dermal thickness of the skin specimen sent from the graft. Results  The primary contraction of the graft had a very significant correlation only with the initial size of graft harvested with a linear regression of 33.3% and a Spearman's correlation of 0.587 significant at a p -value of 0.001. Conclusion  This study though preliminary tries to highlight an important factor that primary contraction of grafts is a physical phenomenon independent of its contents like collagen, elastin, or MMP-1 and -2 or age and dependent on its initial size of harvest instead.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9902097
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99020972023-02-07 Is “Initial Size of the Graft the Real Culprit behind Primary Contraction of Full-Thickness Skin Graft”? – A Cross-Sectional Study Vathulya, Madhubari Rao, Shalinee Malik, Akanksha Sinha, Smita Kumar, Nikhilesh Kapoor, Akshay Bahurupi, Yogesh Arch Plast Surg Background  Primary contraction of full-thickness graft has been traditionally quoted to be 40%. There are lacunae in literature to elaborate on the factors influencing it ever since. Methods  About 75 subjects who underwent full-thickness grafting procedures to resurface small defects were included in the study. The initial and final graft dimensions after primary contraction were traced on X-ray templates and the percentage of contraction was evaluated using the graphical method. This was further correlated with age, collagen, elastic matrix metalloproteinases-1 (MMP-1) and -2 content along with dermal thickness of the skin specimen sent from the graft. Results  The primary contraction of the graft had a very significant correlation only with the initial size of graft harvested with a linear regression of 33.3% and a Spearman's correlation of 0.587 significant at a p -value of 0.001. Conclusion  This study though preliminary tries to highlight an important factor that primary contraction of grafts is a physical phenomenon independent of its contents like collagen, elastin, or MMP-1 and -2 or age and dependent on its initial size of harvest instead. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2023-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9902097/ /pubmed/36755654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1756297 Text en The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Vathulya, Madhubari
Rao, Shalinee
Malik, Akanksha
Sinha, Smita
Kumar, Nikhilesh
Kapoor, Akshay
Bahurupi, Yogesh
Is “Initial Size of the Graft the Real Culprit behind Primary Contraction of Full-Thickness Skin Graft”? – A Cross-Sectional Study
title Is “Initial Size of the Graft the Real Culprit behind Primary Contraction of Full-Thickness Skin Graft”? – A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Is “Initial Size of the Graft the Real Culprit behind Primary Contraction of Full-Thickness Skin Graft”? – A Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Is “Initial Size of the Graft the Real Culprit behind Primary Contraction of Full-Thickness Skin Graft”? – A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Is “Initial Size of the Graft the Real Culprit behind Primary Contraction of Full-Thickness Skin Graft”? – A Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Is “Initial Size of the Graft the Real Culprit behind Primary Contraction of Full-Thickness Skin Graft”? – A Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort is “initial size of the graft the real culprit behind primary contraction of full-thickness skin graft”? – a cross-sectional study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9902097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36755654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1756297
work_keys_str_mv AT vathulyamadhubari isinitialsizeofthegrafttherealculpritbehindprimarycontractionoffullthicknessskingraftacrosssectionalstudy
AT raoshalinee isinitialsizeofthegrafttherealculpritbehindprimarycontractionoffullthicknessskingraftacrosssectionalstudy
AT malikakanksha isinitialsizeofthegrafttherealculpritbehindprimarycontractionoffullthicknessskingraftacrosssectionalstudy
AT sinhasmita isinitialsizeofthegrafttherealculpritbehindprimarycontractionoffullthicknessskingraftacrosssectionalstudy
AT kumarnikhilesh isinitialsizeofthegrafttherealculpritbehindprimarycontractionoffullthicknessskingraftacrosssectionalstudy
AT kapoorakshay isinitialsizeofthegrafttherealculpritbehindprimarycontractionoffullthicknessskingraftacrosssectionalstudy
AT bahurupiyogesh isinitialsizeofthegrafttherealculpritbehindprimarycontractionoffullthicknessskingraftacrosssectionalstudy