Cargando…
Is “Initial Size of the Graft the Real Culprit behind Primary Contraction of Full-Thickness Skin Graft”? – A Cross-Sectional Study
Background Primary contraction of full-thickness graft has been traditionally quoted to be 40%. There are lacunae in literature to elaborate on the factors influencing it ever since. Methods About 75 subjects who underwent full-thickness grafting procedures to resurface small defects were included...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9902097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36755654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1756297 |
_version_ | 1784883183672623104 |
---|---|
author | Vathulya, Madhubari Rao, Shalinee Malik, Akanksha Sinha, Smita Kumar, Nikhilesh Kapoor, Akshay Bahurupi, Yogesh |
author_facet | Vathulya, Madhubari Rao, Shalinee Malik, Akanksha Sinha, Smita Kumar, Nikhilesh Kapoor, Akshay Bahurupi, Yogesh |
author_sort | Vathulya, Madhubari |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background Primary contraction of full-thickness graft has been traditionally quoted to be 40%. There are lacunae in literature to elaborate on the factors influencing it ever since. Methods About 75 subjects who underwent full-thickness grafting procedures to resurface small defects were included in the study. The initial and final graft dimensions after primary contraction were traced on X-ray templates and the percentage of contraction was evaluated using the graphical method. This was further correlated with age, collagen, elastic matrix metalloproteinases-1 (MMP-1) and -2 content along with dermal thickness of the skin specimen sent from the graft. Results The primary contraction of the graft had a very significant correlation only with the initial size of graft harvested with a linear regression of 33.3% and a Spearman's correlation of 0.587 significant at a p -value of 0.001. Conclusion This study though preliminary tries to highlight an important factor that primary contraction of grafts is a physical phenomenon independent of its contents like collagen, elastin, or MMP-1 and -2 or age and dependent on its initial size of harvest instead. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9902097 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99020972023-02-07 Is “Initial Size of the Graft the Real Culprit behind Primary Contraction of Full-Thickness Skin Graft”? – A Cross-Sectional Study Vathulya, Madhubari Rao, Shalinee Malik, Akanksha Sinha, Smita Kumar, Nikhilesh Kapoor, Akshay Bahurupi, Yogesh Arch Plast Surg Background Primary contraction of full-thickness graft has been traditionally quoted to be 40%. There are lacunae in literature to elaborate on the factors influencing it ever since. Methods About 75 subjects who underwent full-thickness grafting procedures to resurface small defects were included in the study. The initial and final graft dimensions after primary contraction were traced on X-ray templates and the percentage of contraction was evaluated using the graphical method. This was further correlated with age, collagen, elastic matrix metalloproteinases-1 (MMP-1) and -2 content along with dermal thickness of the skin specimen sent from the graft. Results The primary contraction of the graft had a very significant correlation only with the initial size of graft harvested with a linear regression of 33.3% and a Spearman's correlation of 0.587 significant at a p -value of 0.001. Conclusion This study though preliminary tries to highlight an important factor that primary contraction of grafts is a physical phenomenon independent of its contents like collagen, elastin, or MMP-1 and -2 or age and dependent on its initial size of harvest instead. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2023-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9902097/ /pubmed/36755654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1756297 Text en The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Vathulya, Madhubari Rao, Shalinee Malik, Akanksha Sinha, Smita Kumar, Nikhilesh Kapoor, Akshay Bahurupi, Yogesh Is “Initial Size of the Graft the Real Culprit behind Primary Contraction of Full-Thickness Skin Graft”? – A Cross-Sectional Study |
title | Is “Initial Size of the Graft the Real Culprit behind Primary Contraction of Full-Thickness Skin Graft”? – A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full | Is “Initial Size of the Graft the Real Culprit behind Primary Contraction of Full-Thickness Skin Graft”? – A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_fullStr | Is “Initial Size of the Graft the Real Culprit behind Primary Contraction of Full-Thickness Skin Graft”? – A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Is “Initial Size of the Graft the Real Culprit behind Primary Contraction of Full-Thickness Skin Graft”? – A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_short | Is “Initial Size of the Graft the Real Culprit behind Primary Contraction of Full-Thickness Skin Graft”? – A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_sort | is “initial size of the graft the real culprit behind primary contraction of full-thickness skin graft”? – a cross-sectional study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9902097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36755654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1756297 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vathulyamadhubari isinitialsizeofthegrafttherealculpritbehindprimarycontractionoffullthicknessskingraftacrosssectionalstudy AT raoshalinee isinitialsizeofthegrafttherealculpritbehindprimarycontractionoffullthicknessskingraftacrosssectionalstudy AT malikakanksha isinitialsizeofthegrafttherealculpritbehindprimarycontractionoffullthicknessskingraftacrosssectionalstudy AT sinhasmita isinitialsizeofthegrafttherealculpritbehindprimarycontractionoffullthicknessskingraftacrosssectionalstudy AT kumarnikhilesh isinitialsizeofthegrafttherealculpritbehindprimarycontractionoffullthicknessskingraftacrosssectionalstudy AT kapoorakshay isinitialsizeofthegrafttherealculpritbehindprimarycontractionoffullthicknessskingraftacrosssectionalstudy AT bahurupiyogesh isinitialsizeofthegrafttherealculpritbehindprimarycontractionoffullthicknessskingraftacrosssectionalstudy |