Cargando…

Prognosis of Liposarcoma Patients in Modern ERA: Single-Center Experience

Objective  Liposarcomas are relatively rare tumors. Prognostic and predictive factors and treatment options are limited. We herein presented our 10-year experience with liposarcomas. Materials and Methods  Adult patients with liposarcoma treated between 2005 and 2015 in our center were included. Dem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Demir, Metin, Güven, Denizcan, Aktaş, Burak Yasin, Güner, Gürkan, Aktepe, Oktay Halit, Taban, Hakan, Karakaş, Yusuf, Kılıçkap, Sadettin, Kars, Ayşe, Türker, Alev, Dizdar, Ömer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9902100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36756104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1755467
_version_ 1784883184396140544
author Demir, Metin
Güven, Denizcan
Aktaş, Burak Yasin
Güner, Gürkan
Aktepe, Oktay Halit
Taban, Hakan
Karakaş, Yusuf
Kılıçkap, Sadettin
Kars, Ayşe
Türker, Alev
Dizdar, Ömer
author_facet Demir, Metin
Güven, Denizcan
Aktaş, Burak Yasin
Güner, Gürkan
Aktepe, Oktay Halit
Taban, Hakan
Karakaş, Yusuf
Kılıçkap, Sadettin
Kars, Ayşe
Türker, Alev
Dizdar, Ömer
author_sort Demir, Metin
collection PubMed
description Objective  Liposarcomas are relatively rare tumors. Prognostic and predictive factors and treatment options are limited. We herein presented our 10-year experience with liposarcomas. Materials and Methods  Adult patients with liposarcoma treated between 2005 and 2015 in our center were included. Demographic and clinicopathologic features of patients were retrieved from patient files. Statistical Analyses  Outcomes in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed along with potential prognostic factors using Kaplan–Meier analyses. Results  A total of 88 patients were included. The median age was 52. Rates of well-differentiated (WDLS), dedifferentiated (DDLS), myxoid (MLS), and pleomorphic liposarcomas (PLS) were 42, 9.1, 37.5, and 4.5%, respectively. Only 10% of patients had high-grade tumors and 93% had localized disease. Ninety-six percent of patients ( n  = 84) underwent surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy was delivered to 16 patients. The most common regimen was ifosfamide–doxorubicin. Recurrences were observed in 30 patients, 21 had local, and 9 had distant metastasis. Five-year DFS of patients with the localized disease was 68%. All patients with PLS had relapses and those had the highest distant relapse rates among all subtypes. Multivariate analysis showed T stage and grade were associated with DFS. Five-year OS of the entire population was 68%. Five-year OS was 79, 76, 50, and 0% in WDLS, MLS, DDLS, and PLS, respectively ( p  = 0.002). Conclusion  Management of liposarcomas is still challenging. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment. Novel effective therapies are needed, particularly in advanced disease settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9902100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99021002023-02-07 Prognosis of Liposarcoma Patients in Modern ERA: Single-Center Experience Demir, Metin Güven, Denizcan Aktaş, Burak Yasin Güner, Gürkan Aktepe, Oktay Halit Taban, Hakan Karakaş, Yusuf Kılıçkap, Sadettin Kars, Ayşe Türker, Alev Dizdar, Ömer South Asian J Cancer Objective  Liposarcomas are relatively rare tumors. Prognostic and predictive factors and treatment options are limited. We herein presented our 10-year experience with liposarcomas. Materials and Methods  Adult patients with liposarcoma treated between 2005 and 2015 in our center were included. Demographic and clinicopathologic features of patients were retrieved from patient files. Statistical Analyses  Outcomes in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed along with potential prognostic factors using Kaplan–Meier analyses. Results  A total of 88 patients were included. The median age was 52. Rates of well-differentiated (WDLS), dedifferentiated (DDLS), myxoid (MLS), and pleomorphic liposarcomas (PLS) were 42, 9.1, 37.5, and 4.5%, respectively. Only 10% of patients had high-grade tumors and 93% had localized disease. Ninety-six percent of patients ( n  = 84) underwent surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy was delivered to 16 patients. The most common regimen was ifosfamide–doxorubicin. Recurrences were observed in 30 patients, 21 had local, and 9 had distant metastasis. Five-year DFS of patients with the localized disease was 68%. All patients with PLS had relapses and those had the highest distant relapse rates among all subtypes. Multivariate analysis showed T stage and grade were associated with DFS. Five-year OS of the entire population was 68%. Five-year OS was 79, 76, 50, and 0% in WDLS, MLS, DDLS, and PLS, respectively ( p  = 0.002). Conclusion  Management of liposarcomas is still challenging. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment. Novel effective therapies are needed, particularly in advanced disease settings. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2022-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9902100/ /pubmed/36756104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1755467 Text en MedIntel Services Pvt Ltd. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Demir, Metin
Güven, Denizcan
Aktaş, Burak Yasin
Güner, Gürkan
Aktepe, Oktay Halit
Taban, Hakan
Karakaş, Yusuf
Kılıçkap, Sadettin
Kars, Ayşe
Türker, Alev
Dizdar, Ömer
Prognosis of Liposarcoma Patients in Modern ERA: Single-Center Experience
title Prognosis of Liposarcoma Patients in Modern ERA: Single-Center Experience
title_full Prognosis of Liposarcoma Patients in Modern ERA: Single-Center Experience
title_fullStr Prognosis of Liposarcoma Patients in Modern ERA: Single-Center Experience
title_full_unstemmed Prognosis of Liposarcoma Patients in Modern ERA: Single-Center Experience
title_short Prognosis of Liposarcoma Patients in Modern ERA: Single-Center Experience
title_sort prognosis of liposarcoma patients in modern era: single-center experience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9902100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36756104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1755467
work_keys_str_mv AT demirmetin prognosisofliposarcomapatientsinmodernerasinglecenterexperience
AT guvendenizcan prognosisofliposarcomapatientsinmodernerasinglecenterexperience
AT aktasburakyasin prognosisofliposarcomapatientsinmodernerasinglecenterexperience
AT gunergurkan prognosisofliposarcomapatientsinmodernerasinglecenterexperience
AT aktepeoktayhalit prognosisofliposarcomapatientsinmodernerasinglecenterexperience
AT tabanhakan prognosisofliposarcomapatientsinmodernerasinglecenterexperience
AT karakasyusuf prognosisofliposarcomapatientsinmodernerasinglecenterexperience
AT kılıckapsadettin prognosisofliposarcomapatientsinmodernerasinglecenterexperience
AT karsayse prognosisofliposarcomapatientsinmodernerasinglecenterexperience
AT turkeralev prognosisofliposarcomapatientsinmodernerasinglecenterexperience
AT dizdaromer prognosisofliposarcomapatientsinmodernerasinglecenterexperience