Cargando…

Clinical application of the contrast-enhancement boost technique in computed tomography angiography of the portal vein

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore the improved image quality of the portal vein using the contrast-enhancement boost (CE-boost) technique for the improved visibility of abdominal-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans in clinical practice. METHODS: This retrospective study included 50 p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hou, Juan, Zhang, Yuan, Yan, Jing, Zhang, Tieliang, Xia, Wenwen, Zhu, Yucai, Liu, Wenya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9902311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36471003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03754-4
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore the improved image quality of the portal vein using the contrast-enhancement boost (CE-boost) technique for the improved visibility of abdominal-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans in clinical practice. METHODS: This retrospective study included 50 patients in Group A who underwent routine abdominal-enhanced CT and 50 patients in Group B who underwent abdominal computed tomography angiography (CTA) with matched body mass index, age, and sex. Images in Group A were postprocessed with the CE-boost technique for further enhanced visibility of the portal vein. Both subjective and objective assessments of different branches of the portal vein in three types of images (i.e., Group A with CE-boost and without CE-boost, Group B) were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The subjective scores of two experienced radiologists showed good consistency (kappa value > 0.624, p < 0.001), and the score of Group A with CE-boost (mean, 4.64) was significantly higher than that of the others (p < 0.001). The liver parenchyma and most target veins in Group A with CE-boost showed the highest CT, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values and the lowest standard deviation (SD), while the CNR of most portal veins in Group A without CE-boost had the lowest CNR (p < 0.001). There were no differences in the SNR of the portal vein in Group A without CE-Boost and Group B (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: CE-boost can significantly improve image quality in portal vein imaging without any additional scanning settings or changes in the clinical workflow. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]