Cargando…
Comparison of PSA density and lesion volume strategies for selecting men with equivocal PI-RADS 3 lesions on bpMRI for biopsies
PURPOSE: To compare two strategies: Prostate-specific antigen density (PSAd) and lesion volume measurement in ruling out significant prostate cancer (sPCa) in men with equivocal Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) category 3 index lesions on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9902318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36318331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03720-0 |
_version_ | 1784883233687601152 |
---|---|
author | Kortenbach, Karen-Cecilie Løgager, Vibeke Thomsen, Henrik S. Boesen, Lars |
author_facet | Kortenbach, Karen-Cecilie Løgager, Vibeke Thomsen, Henrik S. Boesen, Lars |
author_sort | Kortenbach, Karen-Cecilie |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare two strategies: Prostate-specific antigen density (PSAd) and lesion volume measurement in ruling out significant prostate cancer (sPCa) in men with equivocal Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) category 3 index lesions on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: In total, 130 men from our database had index lesions with PI-RADS scores of 3. Prostate volume was measured using the ellipsoid method, in accordance with PI-RADS version 2.1 criteria. Index lesion volumes were also measured using the ellipsoidal formula on the diffusion-weighted imaging sequence with the highest b-value and sagittal T2 sequences. RESULTS: Among 130 men with PI-RADS category 3 index lesions, 23 (18%) had sPCa. In total, 6 of the 89 men with PSAd < 0.15 ng/mL(2) (7%) had sPCa, whereas 8 of the 49 men with index lesion volumes < 0.5 mL (16%) had sPCa. The difference was statistically significant (McNemar, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The PSAd strategy performed better than the lesion volume strategy in ruling out sPCa in men with equivocal PI-RADS category 3 index lesions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9902318 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99023182023-02-08 Comparison of PSA density and lesion volume strategies for selecting men with equivocal PI-RADS 3 lesions on bpMRI for biopsies Kortenbach, Karen-Cecilie Løgager, Vibeke Thomsen, Henrik S. Boesen, Lars Abdom Radiol (NY) Kidneys, Ureters, Bladder, Retroperitoneum PURPOSE: To compare two strategies: Prostate-specific antigen density (PSAd) and lesion volume measurement in ruling out significant prostate cancer (sPCa) in men with equivocal Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) category 3 index lesions on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: In total, 130 men from our database had index lesions with PI-RADS scores of 3. Prostate volume was measured using the ellipsoid method, in accordance with PI-RADS version 2.1 criteria. Index lesion volumes were also measured using the ellipsoidal formula on the diffusion-weighted imaging sequence with the highest b-value and sagittal T2 sequences. RESULTS: Among 130 men with PI-RADS category 3 index lesions, 23 (18%) had sPCa. In total, 6 of the 89 men with PSAd < 0.15 ng/mL(2) (7%) had sPCa, whereas 8 of the 49 men with index lesion volumes < 0.5 mL (16%) had sPCa. The difference was statistically significant (McNemar, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The PSAd strategy performed better than the lesion volume strategy in ruling out sPCa in men with equivocal PI-RADS category 3 index lesions. Springer US 2022-11-01 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9902318/ /pubmed/36318331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03720-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Kidneys, Ureters, Bladder, Retroperitoneum Kortenbach, Karen-Cecilie Løgager, Vibeke Thomsen, Henrik S. Boesen, Lars Comparison of PSA density and lesion volume strategies for selecting men with equivocal PI-RADS 3 lesions on bpMRI for biopsies |
title | Comparison of PSA density and lesion volume strategies for selecting men with equivocal PI-RADS 3 lesions on bpMRI for biopsies |
title_full | Comparison of PSA density and lesion volume strategies for selecting men with equivocal PI-RADS 3 lesions on bpMRI for biopsies |
title_fullStr | Comparison of PSA density and lesion volume strategies for selecting men with equivocal PI-RADS 3 lesions on bpMRI for biopsies |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of PSA density and lesion volume strategies for selecting men with equivocal PI-RADS 3 lesions on bpMRI for biopsies |
title_short | Comparison of PSA density and lesion volume strategies for selecting men with equivocal PI-RADS 3 lesions on bpMRI for biopsies |
title_sort | comparison of psa density and lesion volume strategies for selecting men with equivocal pi-rads 3 lesions on bpmri for biopsies |
topic | Kidneys, Ureters, Bladder, Retroperitoneum |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9902318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36318331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03720-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kortenbachkarencecilie comparisonofpsadensityandlesionvolumestrategiesforselectingmenwithequivocalpirads3lesionsonbpmriforbiopsies AT løgagervibeke comparisonofpsadensityandlesionvolumestrategiesforselectingmenwithequivocalpirads3lesionsonbpmriforbiopsies AT thomsenhenriks comparisonofpsadensityandlesionvolumestrategiesforselectingmenwithequivocalpirads3lesionsonbpmriforbiopsies AT boesenlars comparisonofpsadensityandlesionvolumestrategiesforselectingmenwithequivocalpirads3lesionsonbpmriforbiopsies |