Cargando…

The double-balloon technique: a safe and effective adjunctive technique in patients undergoing arterial therapy for hepatic malignancies with vascular supply not amenable to selective administration

PURPOSE: During catheter directed intraarterial therapy for liver lesions, challenging hepatic vascular anatomy can sometimes prevent selective administration of treatment delivery to liver tumors leading to increased toxicity to normal liver parenchyma. The objective of this study is to describe a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tanaka, Mari, Uppot, Raul, Daye, Dania, Liu, Raymond, Wehrenberg-Klee, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9902581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36746809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-023-00349-y
_version_ 1784883293443850240
author Tanaka, Mari
Uppot, Raul
Daye, Dania
Liu, Raymond
Wehrenberg-Klee, Eric
author_facet Tanaka, Mari
Uppot, Raul
Daye, Dania
Liu, Raymond
Wehrenberg-Klee, Eric
author_sort Tanaka, Mari
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: During catheter directed intraarterial therapy for liver lesions, challenging hepatic vascular anatomy can sometimes prevent selective administration of treatment delivery to liver tumors leading to increased toxicity to normal liver parenchyma. The objective of this study is to describe a variation of the double balloon technique that isolates the feeding artery to liver tumors proximally and distally to provide treatment delivery in lesions that cannot be otherwise selected. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective review of 7 patients who had undergone either radioembolization, chemoembolization, or bland embolization and the double balloon technique was employed. The devices used for flow augmentation were two 2.1 French balloon microcatheters (Sniper™, Embolx). One balloon was inflated distal to target vessel and the second was inflated proximal to protect from reflux. RESULTS: DEB-TACE was performed in 3 cases, (90)Y was performed in 4, and bland embolization was performed in the last patient. There were no adverse effects from the procedure or clinically evident effects from non-target embolization. Mean follow up time was 286.4 +/− 200.1 days. Six of the 7 patients are alive. One patient passed away on post-procedure day 121 from septic shock unrelated to the procedure. One patient was bridged to transplant with an additional TACE of a separate lesion. CONCLUSION: Double-balloon technique for patients undergoing (90)Y or chemoembolization is a safe adjunctive technique for super selective treatment of hepatic lesions where direct selection via catheter is not feasible. This may increase the range of lesions that can be both safely and effectively treated by catheter directed therapies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42155-023-00349-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9902581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99025812023-02-08 The double-balloon technique: a safe and effective adjunctive technique in patients undergoing arterial therapy for hepatic malignancies with vascular supply not amenable to selective administration Tanaka, Mari Uppot, Raul Daye, Dania Liu, Raymond Wehrenberg-Klee, Eric CVIR Endovasc Original Article PURPOSE: During catheter directed intraarterial therapy for liver lesions, challenging hepatic vascular anatomy can sometimes prevent selective administration of treatment delivery to liver tumors leading to increased toxicity to normal liver parenchyma. The objective of this study is to describe a variation of the double balloon technique that isolates the feeding artery to liver tumors proximally and distally to provide treatment delivery in lesions that cannot be otherwise selected. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective review of 7 patients who had undergone either radioembolization, chemoembolization, or bland embolization and the double balloon technique was employed. The devices used for flow augmentation were two 2.1 French balloon microcatheters (Sniper™, Embolx). One balloon was inflated distal to target vessel and the second was inflated proximal to protect from reflux. RESULTS: DEB-TACE was performed in 3 cases, (90)Y was performed in 4, and bland embolization was performed in the last patient. There were no adverse effects from the procedure or clinically evident effects from non-target embolization. Mean follow up time was 286.4 +/− 200.1 days. Six of the 7 patients are alive. One patient passed away on post-procedure day 121 from septic shock unrelated to the procedure. One patient was bridged to transplant with an additional TACE of a separate lesion. CONCLUSION: Double-balloon technique for patients undergoing (90)Y or chemoembolization is a safe adjunctive technique for super selective treatment of hepatic lesions where direct selection via catheter is not feasible. This may increase the range of lesions that can be both safely and effectively treated by catheter directed therapies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42155-023-00349-y. Springer International Publishing 2023-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9902581/ /pubmed/36746809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-023-00349-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Tanaka, Mari
Uppot, Raul
Daye, Dania
Liu, Raymond
Wehrenberg-Klee, Eric
The double-balloon technique: a safe and effective adjunctive technique in patients undergoing arterial therapy for hepatic malignancies with vascular supply not amenable to selective administration
title The double-balloon technique: a safe and effective adjunctive technique in patients undergoing arterial therapy for hepatic malignancies with vascular supply not amenable to selective administration
title_full The double-balloon technique: a safe and effective adjunctive technique in patients undergoing arterial therapy for hepatic malignancies with vascular supply not amenable to selective administration
title_fullStr The double-balloon technique: a safe and effective adjunctive technique in patients undergoing arterial therapy for hepatic malignancies with vascular supply not amenable to selective administration
title_full_unstemmed The double-balloon technique: a safe and effective adjunctive technique in patients undergoing arterial therapy for hepatic malignancies with vascular supply not amenable to selective administration
title_short The double-balloon technique: a safe and effective adjunctive technique in patients undergoing arterial therapy for hepatic malignancies with vascular supply not amenable to selective administration
title_sort double-balloon technique: a safe and effective adjunctive technique in patients undergoing arterial therapy for hepatic malignancies with vascular supply not amenable to selective administration
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9902581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36746809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-023-00349-y
work_keys_str_mv AT tanakamari thedoubleballoontechniqueasafeandeffectiveadjunctivetechniqueinpatientsundergoingarterialtherapyforhepaticmalignancieswithvascularsupplynotamenabletoselectiveadministration
AT uppotraul thedoubleballoontechniqueasafeandeffectiveadjunctivetechniqueinpatientsundergoingarterialtherapyforhepaticmalignancieswithvascularsupplynotamenabletoselectiveadministration
AT dayedania thedoubleballoontechniqueasafeandeffectiveadjunctivetechniqueinpatientsundergoingarterialtherapyforhepaticmalignancieswithvascularsupplynotamenabletoselectiveadministration
AT liuraymond thedoubleballoontechniqueasafeandeffectiveadjunctivetechniqueinpatientsundergoingarterialtherapyforhepaticmalignancieswithvascularsupplynotamenabletoselectiveadministration
AT wehrenbergkleeeric thedoubleballoontechniqueasafeandeffectiveadjunctivetechniqueinpatientsundergoingarterialtherapyforhepaticmalignancieswithvascularsupplynotamenabletoselectiveadministration
AT tanakamari doubleballoontechniqueasafeandeffectiveadjunctivetechniqueinpatientsundergoingarterialtherapyforhepaticmalignancieswithvascularsupplynotamenabletoselectiveadministration
AT uppotraul doubleballoontechniqueasafeandeffectiveadjunctivetechniqueinpatientsundergoingarterialtherapyforhepaticmalignancieswithvascularsupplynotamenabletoselectiveadministration
AT dayedania doubleballoontechniqueasafeandeffectiveadjunctivetechniqueinpatientsundergoingarterialtherapyforhepaticmalignancieswithvascularsupplynotamenabletoselectiveadministration
AT liuraymond doubleballoontechniqueasafeandeffectiveadjunctivetechniqueinpatientsundergoingarterialtherapyforhepaticmalignancieswithvascularsupplynotamenabletoselectiveadministration
AT wehrenbergkleeeric doubleballoontechniqueasafeandeffectiveadjunctivetechniqueinpatientsundergoingarterialtherapyforhepaticmalignancieswithvascularsupplynotamenabletoselectiveadministration