Cargando…

Estimation of moral distress among nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Moral distress is a common challenge among professional nurses when caring for their patients, especially when they need to make rapid decisions. Therefore, leaving moral distress unconsidered may jeopardize patient quality of care, safety, and satisfaction. AIM: To estimate moral distre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alimoradi, Zainab, Jafari, Elahe, Lin, Chung-Ying, Rajabi, Raheleh, Marznaki, Zohreh Hosseini, Soodmand, Mostafa, Potenza, Marc N, Pakpour, Amir H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9902807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36704986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09697330221135212
_version_ 1784883341434028032
author Alimoradi, Zainab
Jafari, Elahe
Lin, Chung-Ying
Rajabi, Raheleh
Marznaki, Zohreh Hosseini
Soodmand, Mostafa
Potenza, Marc N
Pakpour, Amir H
author_facet Alimoradi, Zainab
Jafari, Elahe
Lin, Chung-Ying
Rajabi, Raheleh
Marznaki, Zohreh Hosseini
Soodmand, Mostafa
Potenza, Marc N
Pakpour, Amir H
author_sort Alimoradi, Zainab
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Moral distress is a common challenge among professional nurses when caring for their patients, especially when they need to make rapid decisions. Therefore, leaving moral distress unconsidered may jeopardize patient quality of care, safety, and satisfaction. AIM: To estimate moral distress among nurses. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis conducted systematic search in Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest, ISI Web of Knowledge, and PsycInfo up to end of February 2022. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa checklist. Data from included studies were pooled by meta-analysis with random effect model in STATA software version 14. The selected key measure was mean score of moral distress total score with its’ 95% Confidence Interval was reported. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were conducted to identify possible sources of heterogeneity and potentially influencing variables on moral distress. Funnel plots and Begg’s Tests were used to assess publication bias. The Jackknife method was used for sensitivity analysis. ETHICAL CONSIDERATION: The protocol of this project was registered in the PROSPERO database under decree code of CRD42021267773. RESULTS: Eighty-six manuscripts with 19,537 participants from 21 countries were included. The pooled estimated mean score of moral distress was 2.55 on a 0–10 scale [95% Confidence Interval: 2.27–2.84, I(2): 98.4%, Tau(2):0.94]. Publication bias and small study effect was ruled out. Moral distress significantly decreased in the COVID-19 pandemic versus before. Nurses working in developing countries experienced higher level of moral distress compared to their counterparts in developed countries. Nurses' workplace (e.g., hospital ward) was not linked to severity of moral disturbance. CONCLUSION: The results of the study showed a low level of pooled estimated score for moral distress. Although the score of moral distress was not high, nurses working in developing countries reported higher levels of moral distress than those working in developed countries. Therefore, it is necessary that future studies focus on creating a supportive environment in hospitals and medical centers for nurses to reduce moral distress and improve healthcare.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9902807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99028072023-02-07 Estimation of moral distress among nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis Alimoradi, Zainab Jafari, Elahe Lin, Chung-Ying Rajabi, Raheleh Marznaki, Zohreh Hosseini Soodmand, Mostafa Potenza, Marc N Pakpour, Amir H Nurs Ethics Original Manuscripts BACKGROUND: Moral distress is a common challenge among professional nurses when caring for their patients, especially when they need to make rapid decisions. Therefore, leaving moral distress unconsidered may jeopardize patient quality of care, safety, and satisfaction. AIM: To estimate moral distress among nurses. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis conducted systematic search in Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest, ISI Web of Knowledge, and PsycInfo up to end of February 2022. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa checklist. Data from included studies were pooled by meta-analysis with random effect model in STATA software version 14. The selected key measure was mean score of moral distress total score with its’ 95% Confidence Interval was reported. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were conducted to identify possible sources of heterogeneity and potentially influencing variables on moral distress. Funnel plots and Begg’s Tests were used to assess publication bias. The Jackknife method was used for sensitivity analysis. ETHICAL CONSIDERATION: The protocol of this project was registered in the PROSPERO database under decree code of CRD42021267773. RESULTS: Eighty-six manuscripts with 19,537 participants from 21 countries were included. The pooled estimated mean score of moral distress was 2.55 on a 0–10 scale [95% Confidence Interval: 2.27–2.84, I(2): 98.4%, Tau(2):0.94]. Publication bias and small study effect was ruled out. Moral distress significantly decreased in the COVID-19 pandemic versus before. Nurses working in developing countries experienced higher level of moral distress compared to their counterparts in developed countries. Nurses' workplace (e.g., hospital ward) was not linked to severity of moral disturbance. CONCLUSION: The results of the study showed a low level of pooled estimated score for moral distress. Although the score of moral distress was not high, nurses working in developing countries reported higher levels of moral distress than those working in developed countries. Therefore, it is necessary that future studies focus on creating a supportive environment in hospitals and medical centers for nurses to reduce moral distress and improve healthcare. SAGE Publications 2023-01-27 2023-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9902807/ /pubmed/36704986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09697330221135212 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Manuscripts
Alimoradi, Zainab
Jafari, Elahe
Lin, Chung-Ying
Rajabi, Raheleh
Marznaki, Zohreh Hosseini
Soodmand, Mostafa
Potenza, Marc N
Pakpour, Amir H
Estimation of moral distress among nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Estimation of moral distress among nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Estimation of moral distress among nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Estimation of moral distress among nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Estimation of moral distress among nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Estimation of moral distress among nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort estimation of moral distress among nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Manuscripts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9902807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36704986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09697330221135212
work_keys_str_mv AT alimoradizainab estimationofmoraldistressamongnursesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jafarielahe estimationofmoraldistressamongnursesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT linchungying estimationofmoraldistressamongnursesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rajabiraheleh estimationofmoraldistressamongnursesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT marznakizohrehhosseini estimationofmoraldistressamongnursesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT soodmandmostafa estimationofmoraldistressamongnursesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT potenzamarcn estimationofmoraldistressamongnursesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pakpouramirh estimationofmoraldistressamongnursesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis