Cargando…

Longitudinal Tau PET Using (18)F-Flortaucipir: The Effect of Relative Cerebral Blood Flow on Quantitative and Semiquantitative Parameters

Semiquantitative PET measures such as SUV ratio (SUVr) have several advantages over quantitative measures, such as practical applicability and relative computational simplicity. However, SUVr may potentially be affected by changes in blood flow, whereas quantitative measures such as nondisplaceable...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Visser, Denise, Tuncel, Hayel, Ossenkoppele, Rik, Yaqub, Maqsood, Wolters, Emma E., Timmers, Tessa, Weltings, Emma, Coomans, Emma M., den Hollander, Marijke E., van der Flier, Wiesje M., van Berckel, Bart N.M., Golla, Sandeep S.V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Nuclear Medicine 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9902853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36265910
http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.263926
_version_ 1784883350863872000
author Visser, Denise
Tuncel, Hayel
Ossenkoppele, Rik
Yaqub, Maqsood
Wolters, Emma E.
Timmers, Tessa
Weltings, Emma
Coomans, Emma M.
den Hollander, Marijke E.
van der Flier, Wiesje M.
van Berckel, Bart N.M.
Golla, Sandeep S.V.
author_facet Visser, Denise
Tuncel, Hayel
Ossenkoppele, Rik
Yaqub, Maqsood
Wolters, Emma E.
Timmers, Tessa
Weltings, Emma
Coomans, Emma M.
den Hollander, Marijke E.
van der Flier, Wiesje M.
van Berckel, Bart N.M.
Golla, Sandeep S.V.
author_sort Visser, Denise
collection PubMed
description Semiquantitative PET measures such as SUV ratio (SUVr) have several advantages over quantitative measures, such as practical applicability and relative computational simplicity. However, SUVr may potentially be affected by changes in blood flow, whereas quantitative measures such as nondisplaceable binding potential (BP(ND)) are not. For (18)F-flortaucipir PET, the sensitivity of SUVr for changes in blood flow is currently unknown. Therefore, we compared semiquantitative (SUVr) and quantitative (BP(ND)) parameters of longitudinal (18)F-flortaucipir PET scans and assessed their vulnerability to changes in blood flow. Methods: Subjects with subjective cognitive decline (n = 38) and Alzheimer disease patients (n = 24) underwent baseline and 2-y follow-up dynamic (18)F-flortaucipir PET scans. BP(ND) and relative tracer delivery were estimated using receptor parametric mapping, and SUVr at 80–100 min was calculated. Regional SUVrs were compared with corresponding distribution volume ratio (BP(ND) + 1) using paired t tests. Additionally, simulations were performed to model effects of larger flow changes in different binding categories. Results: Results in subjective cognitive decline and Alzheimer disease showed only minor differences between SUVr and BP(ND) changes over time. Relative tracer delivery changes were small in all groups. Simulations illustrated a variable bias for SUVr depending on the amount of binding. Conclusion: SUVr provided an accurate estimate of changes in specific binding for (18)F-flortaucipir over a 2-y follow-up during which changes in flow were small. Notwithstanding, simulations showed that large(r) flow changes may affect (18)F-flortaucipir SUVr. Given that it is currently unknown to what order of magnitude pharmacotherapeutic interventions may induce changes in cerebral blood flow, caution may be warranted when changes in flow are potentially large(r), as in clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9902853
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Society of Nuclear Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99028532023-04-19 Longitudinal Tau PET Using (18)F-Flortaucipir: The Effect of Relative Cerebral Blood Flow on Quantitative and Semiquantitative Parameters Visser, Denise Tuncel, Hayel Ossenkoppele, Rik Yaqub, Maqsood Wolters, Emma E. Timmers, Tessa Weltings, Emma Coomans, Emma M. den Hollander, Marijke E. van der Flier, Wiesje M. van Berckel, Bart N.M. Golla, Sandeep S.V. J Nucl Med Clinical Investigation Semiquantitative PET measures such as SUV ratio (SUVr) have several advantages over quantitative measures, such as practical applicability and relative computational simplicity. However, SUVr may potentially be affected by changes in blood flow, whereas quantitative measures such as nondisplaceable binding potential (BP(ND)) are not. For (18)F-flortaucipir PET, the sensitivity of SUVr for changes in blood flow is currently unknown. Therefore, we compared semiquantitative (SUVr) and quantitative (BP(ND)) parameters of longitudinal (18)F-flortaucipir PET scans and assessed their vulnerability to changes in blood flow. Methods: Subjects with subjective cognitive decline (n = 38) and Alzheimer disease patients (n = 24) underwent baseline and 2-y follow-up dynamic (18)F-flortaucipir PET scans. BP(ND) and relative tracer delivery were estimated using receptor parametric mapping, and SUVr at 80–100 min was calculated. Regional SUVrs were compared with corresponding distribution volume ratio (BP(ND) + 1) using paired t tests. Additionally, simulations were performed to model effects of larger flow changes in different binding categories. Results: Results in subjective cognitive decline and Alzheimer disease showed only minor differences between SUVr and BP(ND) changes over time. Relative tracer delivery changes were small in all groups. Simulations illustrated a variable bias for SUVr depending on the amount of binding. Conclusion: SUVr provided an accurate estimate of changes in specific binding for (18)F-flortaucipir over a 2-y follow-up during which changes in flow were small. Notwithstanding, simulations showed that large(r) flow changes may affect (18)F-flortaucipir SUVr. Given that it is currently unknown to what order of magnitude pharmacotherapeutic interventions may induce changes in cerebral blood flow, caution may be warranted when changes in flow are potentially large(r), as in clinical trials. Society of Nuclear Medicine 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9902853/ /pubmed/36265910 http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.263926 Text en © 2023 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Immediate Open Access: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY) allows users to share and adapt with attribution, excluding materials credited to previous publications. License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Details: http://jnm.snmjournals.org/site/misc/permission.xhtml.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Visser, Denise
Tuncel, Hayel
Ossenkoppele, Rik
Yaqub, Maqsood
Wolters, Emma E.
Timmers, Tessa
Weltings, Emma
Coomans, Emma M.
den Hollander, Marijke E.
van der Flier, Wiesje M.
van Berckel, Bart N.M.
Golla, Sandeep S.V.
Longitudinal Tau PET Using (18)F-Flortaucipir: The Effect of Relative Cerebral Blood Flow on Quantitative and Semiquantitative Parameters
title Longitudinal Tau PET Using (18)F-Flortaucipir: The Effect of Relative Cerebral Blood Flow on Quantitative and Semiquantitative Parameters
title_full Longitudinal Tau PET Using (18)F-Flortaucipir: The Effect of Relative Cerebral Blood Flow on Quantitative and Semiquantitative Parameters
title_fullStr Longitudinal Tau PET Using (18)F-Flortaucipir: The Effect of Relative Cerebral Blood Flow on Quantitative and Semiquantitative Parameters
title_full_unstemmed Longitudinal Tau PET Using (18)F-Flortaucipir: The Effect of Relative Cerebral Blood Flow on Quantitative and Semiquantitative Parameters
title_short Longitudinal Tau PET Using (18)F-Flortaucipir: The Effect of Relative Cerebral Blood Flow on Quantitative and Semiquantitative Parameters
title_sort longitudinal tau pet using (18)f-flortaucipir: the effect of relative cerebral blood flow on quantitative and semiquantitative parameters
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9902853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36265910
http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.263926
work_keys_str_mv AT visserdenise longitudinaltaupetusing18fflortaucipirtheeffectofrelativecerebralbloodflowonquantitativeandsemiquantitativeparameters
AT tuncelhayel longitudinaltaupetusing18fflortaucipirtheeffectofrelativecerebralbloodflowonquantitativeandsemiquantitativeparameters
AT ossenkoppelerik longitudinaltaupetusing18fflortaucipirtheeffectofrelativecerebralbloodflowonquantitativeandsemiquantitativeparameters
AT yaqubmaqsood longitudinaltaupetusing18fflortaucipirtheeffectofrelativecerebralbloodflowonquantitativeandsemiquantitativeparameters
AT woltersemmae longitudinaltaupetusing18fflortaucipirtheeffectofrelativecerebralbloodflowonquantitativeandsemiquantitativeparameters
AT timmerstessa longitudinaltaupetusing18fflortaucipirtheeffectofrelativecerebralbloodflowonquantitativeandsemiquantitativeparameters
AT weltingsemma longitudinaltaupetusing18fflortaucipirtheeffectofrelativecerebralbloodflowonquantitativeandsemiquantitativeparameters
AT coomansemmam longitudinaltaupetusing18fflortaucipirtheeffectofrelativecerebralbloodflowonquantitativeandsemiquantitativeparameters
AT denhollandermarijkee longitudinaltaupetusing18fflortaucipirtheeffectofrelativecerebralbloodflowonquantitativeandsemiquantitativeparameters
AT vanderflierwiesjem longitudinaltaupetusing18fflortaucipirtheeffectofrelativecerebralbloodflowonquantitativeandsemiquantitativeparameters
AT vanberckelbartnm longitudinaltaupetusing18fflortaucipirtheeffectofrelativecerebralbloodflowonquantitativeandsemiquantitativeparameters
AT gollasandeepsv longitudinaltaupetusing18fflortaucipirtheeffectofrelativecerebralbloodflowonquantitativeandsemiquantitativeparameters