Cargando…

Comparison of pathogenic bacteria in the upper and lower respiratory tracts of cattle either directly transported to a feedlot or co-mingled at auction markets prior to feedlot placement

INTRODUCTION: Bacterial bronchopneumonia (BP) has been associated with purchasing cattle through auction markets. However, whether auction markets are a source of BP-associated bacterial pathogens is unknown. This study evaluated prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility, and genetic relatedness (usi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hirsch, Christina, Timsit, Edouard, Uddin, Muhammed Salah, Guan, Le Luo, Alexander, Trevor W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9902877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36761402
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.1026470
_version_ 1784883355099070464
author Hirsch, Christina
Timsit, Edouard
Uddin, Muhammed Salah
Guan, Le Luo
Alexander, Trevor W.
author_facet Hirsch, Christina
Timsit, Edouard
Uddin, Muhammed Salah
Guan, Le Luo
Alexander, Trevor W.
author_sort Hirsch, Christina
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Bacterial bronchopneumonia (BP) has been associated with purchasing cattle through auction markets. However, whether auction markets are a source of BP-associated bacterial pathogens is unknown. This study evaluated prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility, and genetic relatedness (using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, PFGE) of Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, and Histophilus somni isolated from cattle either transported to an auction market prior to feedlot placement (AUC), or directly to a feedlot from a farm (RANC). METHODS: Two groups of cattle were enrolled (N = 30 per group) from two separate farms with 15 animals from an individual farm designated as AUC or RANC. Deep nasal swab (DNS) and trans-tracheal aspirates (TTA) were collected on day 0 at weaning (T0) and on day 2 at on-arrival processing at the feedlot (T1). The DNS were also collected on day 9 (T2) and day 30 (T3) after arrival at the feedlot. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In both TTA and DNS, prevalence of bacteria did not differ between AUC and RANC groups (P > 0.05). None of the bacteria isolated at T0 were resistant to antimicrobials and diversity of all bacteria was greatest at T0 and T1. In Group 1 cattle, 100% of P. multocida isolated at T2 and T3 were multi-drug resistant. These isolates were highly related (>90%) according to PFGE, with most being clones. Though limited in size, results for animals evaluated in this study suggested that auction markets were not a major source of resistant BP pathogens, however, horizontal transmission of a multi-resistant strain of P. multocida occurred in a feedlot. Spread of resistant P. multocida was likely due to the selective pressures imposed by feedlot antimicrobial use and encoded resistance by the bacteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9902877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99028772023-02-08 Comparison of pathogenic bacteria in the upper and lower respiratory tracts of cattle either directly transported to a feedlot or co-mingled at auction markets prior to feedlot placement Hirsch, Christina Timsit, Edouard Uddin, Muhammed Salah Guan, Le Luo Alexander, Trevor W. Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science INTRODUCTION: Bacterial bronchopneumonia (BP) has been associated with purchasing cattle through auction markets. However, whether auction markets are a source of BP-associated bacterial pathogens is unknown. This study evaluated prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility, and genetic relatedness (using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, PFGE) of Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, and Histophilus somni isolated from cattle either transported to an auction market prior to feedlot placement (AUC), or directly to a feedlot from a farm (RANC). METHODS: Two groups of cattle were enrolled (N = 30 per group) from two separate farms with 15 animals from an individual farm designated as AUC or RANC. Deep nasal swab (DNS) and trans-tracheal aspirates (TTA) were collected on day 0 at weaning (T0) and on day 2 at on-arrival processing at the feedlot (T1). The DNS were also collected on day 9 (T2) and day 30 (T3) after arrival at the feedlot. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In both TTA and DNS, prevalence of bacteria did not differ between AUC and RANC groups (P > 0.05). None of the bacteria isolated at T0 were resistant to antimicrobials and diversity of all bacteria was greatest at T0 and T1. In Group 1 cattle, 100% of P. multocida isolated at T2 and T3 were multi-drug resistant. These isolates were highly related (>90%) according to PFGE, with most being clones. Though limited in size, results for animals evaluated in this study suggested that auction markets were not a major source of resistant BP pathogens, however, horizontal transmission of a multi-resistant strain of P. multocida occurred in a feedlot. Spread of resistant P. multocida was likely due to the selective pressures imposed by feedlot antimicrobial use and encoded resistance by the bacteria. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9902877/ /pubmed/36761402 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.1026470 Text en Copyright © 2023 Christina Hirsch, Edouard Timsit, Le Luo Guan, and His Majesty the King in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada for the contribution of Trevor W. Alexander and Muhammed Salah Uddin. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Hirsch, Christina
Timsit, Edouard
Uddin, Muhammed Salah
Guan, Le Luo
Alexander, Trevor W.
Comparison of pathogenic bacteria in the upper and lower respiratory tracts of cattle either directly transported to a feedlot or co-mingled at auction markets prior to feedlot placement
title Comparison of pathogenic bacteria in the upper and lower respiratory tracts of cattle either directly transported to a feedlot or co-mingled at auction markets prior to feedlot placement
title_full Comparison of pathogenic bacteria in the upper and lower respiratory tracts of cattle either directly transported to a feedlot or co-mingled at auction markets prior to feedlot placement
title_fullStr Comparison of pathogenic bacteria in the upper and lower respiratory tracts of cattle either directly transported to a feedlot or co-mingled at auction markets prior to feedlot placement
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of pathogenic bacteria in the upper and lower respiratory tracts of cattle either directly transported to a feedlot or co-mingled at auction markets prior to feedlot placement
title_short Comparison of pathogenic bacteria in the upper and lower respiratory tracts of cattle either directly transported to a feedlot or co-mingled at auction markets prior to feedlot placement
title_sort comparison of pathogenic bacteria in the upper and lower respiratory tracts of cattle either directly transported to a feedlot or co-mingled at auction markets prior to feedlot placement
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9902877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36761402
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.1026470
work_keys_str_mv AT hirschchristina comparisonofpathogenicbacteriaintheupperandlowerrespiratorytractsofcattleeitherdirectlytransportedtoafeedlotorcomingledatauctionmarketspriortofeedlotplacement
AT timsitedouard comparisonofpathogenicbacteriaintheupperandlowerrespiratorytractsofcattleeitherdirectlytransportedtoafeedlotorcomingledatauctionmarketspriortofeedlotplacement
AT uddinmuhammedsalah comparisonofpathogenicbacteriaintheupperandlowerrespiratorytractsofcattleeitherdirectlytransportedtoafeedlotorcomingledatauctionmarketspriortofeedlotplacement
AT guanleluo comparisonofpathogenicbacteriaintheupperandlowerrespiratorytractsofcattleeitherdirectlytransportedtoafeedlotorcomingledatauctionmarketspriortofeedlotplacement
AT alexandertrevorw comparisonofpathogenicbacteriaintheupperandlowerrespiratorytractsofcattleeitherdirectlytransportedtoafeedlotorcomingledatauctionmarketspriortofeedlotplacement