Cargando…

Facemask: Protection or threat?

Facemasks were widely used as a protection against SARS-COV-2, which significantly reduced COVID-19 transmission during the pandemic. However, concerns have been raised regarding its adverse impacts on human health due to intense use and mismanagement. Although rampant plastic littering was the norm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morales, Ilah Dianne G., Macusi, Edison D., Jondonero, Manuel Anthony P., Guihawan, Jaime Q., Bacosa, Hernando P., Amparado, Ruben F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9902895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36758311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.114681
_version_ 1784883358137843712
author Morales, Ilah Dianne G.
Macusi, Edison D.
Jondonero, Manuel Anthony P.
Guihawan, Jaime Q.
Bacosa, Hernando P.
Amparado, Ruben F.
author_facet Morales, Ilah Dianne G.
Macusi, Edison D.
Jondonero, Manuel Anthony P.
Guihawan, Jaime Q.
Bacosa, Hernando P.
Amparado, Ruben F.
author_sort Morales, Ilah Dianne G.
collection PubMed
description Facemasks were widely used as a protection against SARS-COV-2, which significantly reduced COVID-19 transmission during the pandemic. However, concerns have been raised regarding its adverse impacts on human health due to intense use and mismanagement. Although rampant plastic littering was the norm before the pandemic, the magnitude of the problem is worsening as potentially COVID-19-infected facemasks are thrown along the shoreline. This study assessed the discarded facemasks on the most popular beach destinations in Mati City, Davao Oriental, Philippines. A total of N = 284 discarded facemasks were found in a cumulative area of 22,500 m(2), with an average density of 8.4 × 10(−4) items/m(2). The surgical facemask (82 %; n = 234) was the most abundant type of facemask found in the areas, followed by KF94 (16 %; n = 45) and KN95 (2 %; n = 5). The Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) showed significant differences in the visual counts of facemasks on the three beaches (p < 0.05).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9902895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99028952023-02-07 Facemask: Protection or threat? Morales, Ilah Dianne G. Macusi, Edison D. Jondonero, Manuel Anthony P. Guihawan, Jaime Q. Bacosa, Hernando P. Amparado, Ruben F. Mar Pollut Bull Article Facemasks were widely used as a protection against SARS-COV-2, which significantly reduced COVID-19 transmission during the pandemic. However, concerns have been raised regarding its adverse impacts on human health due to intense use and mismanagement. Although rampant plastic littering was the norm before the pandemic, the magnitude of the problem is worsening as potentially COVID-19-infected facemasks are thrown along the shoreline. This study assessed the discarded facemasks on the most popular beach destinations in Mati City, Davao Oriental, Philippines. A total of N = 284 discarded facemasks were found in a cumulative area of 22,500 m(2), with an average density of 8.4 × 10(−4) items/m(2). The surgical facemask (82 %; n = 234) was the most abundant type of facemask found in the areas, followed by KF94 (16 %; n = 45) and KN95 (2 %; n = 5). The Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) showed significant differences in the visual counts of facemasks on the three beaches (p < 0.05). Elsevier Ltd. 2023-03 2023-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9902895/ /pubmed/36758311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.114681 Text en © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Morales, Ilah Dianne G.
Macusi, Edison D.
Jondonero, Manuel Anthony P.
Guihawan, Jaime Q.
Bacosa, Hernando P.
Amparado, Ruben F.
Facemask: Protection or threat?
title Facemask: Protection or threat?
title_full Facemask: Protection or threat?
title_fullStr Facemask: Protection or threat?
title_full_unstemmed Facemask: Protection or threat?
title_short Facemask: Protection or threat?
title_sort facemask: protection or threat?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9902895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36758311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.114681
work_keys_str_mv AT moralesilahdianneg facemaskprotectionorthreat
AT macusiedisond facemaskprotectionorthreat
AT jondoneromanuelanthonyp facemaskprotectionorthreat
AT guihawanjaimeq facemaskprotectionorthreat
AT bacosahernandop facemaskprotectionorthreat
AT amparadorubenf facemaskprotectionorthreat