Cargando…
Understanding nurses’ justification of restraint in a neurosurgical setting: A qualitative interview study
BACKGROUND: Despite its negative impact on patients and nurses, the use of restraint in somatic health care continues in many settings. Understanding the reasons and justifications for the use of restraint among nurses is crucial in order to manage this challenge. AIM: To understand nurses’ justific...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9902980/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36266990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09697330221111447 |
_version_ | 1784883377946492928 |
---|---|
author | Guenna Holmgren, Amina von Vogelsang, Ann-Christin Lindblad, Anna Juth, Niklas |
author_facet | Guenna Holmgren, Amina von Vogelsang, Ann-Christin Lindblad, Anna Juth, Niklas |
author_sort | Guenna Holmgren, Amina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite its negative impact on patients and nurses, the use of restraint in somatic health care continues in many settings. Understanding the reasons and justifications for the use of restraint among nurses is crucial in order to manage this challenge. AIM: To understand nurses’ justifications for restraint use in neurosurgical care. RESEARCH DESIGN: A qualitative, descriptive design was used. Data were analysed with inductive qualitative content analysis. PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT: Semi-structured interviews with 15 nurses working in three neurosurgical departments in Sweden. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: Approved by The Regional Ethics Committee, Stockholm, Sweden. FINDINGS: The analysis resulted in three categories. The category Patient factors influencing restraint use describes patient factors that trigger restraint, such as a diminished decision-making competence, restlessness, and need for invasive devices. The category Specific reasons for justifying restraint describes reasons for restraining patients, such as restraint being used for the sake of the patient or for the sake of others. The category General reasoning in justifying restraint describes how nurses reason when using restraint, and the decision to use restraint was often based on a consequentialist approach where the nurses’ weighed the pros and cons of different alternatives. DISCUSSION: Nurses with experience of restraint use were engaged in a constant process of justifying and balancing different options and actions. Restraint was considered legitimate if the benefit exceeded the suffering, but decisions on which restraint measures to use and when to use them depended on the values of the individual nurse. CONCLUSION: How nurses reason when justifying restraint, why they use restraint, and who they use restraint on must be considered when creating programs and guidelines to reduce the use of restraint and to ensure that when it is used it is used carefully, appropriately, and with respect. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9902980 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99029802023-02-08 Understanding nurses’ justification of restraint in a neurosurgical setting: A qualitative interview study Guenna Holmgren, Amina von Vogelsang, Ann-Christin Lindblad, Anna Juth, Niklas Nurs Ethics Original Manuscripts BACKGROUND: Despite its negative impact on patients and nurses, the use of restraint in somatic health care continues in many settings. Understanding the reasons and justifications for the use of restraint among nurses is crucial in order to manage this challenge. AIM: To understand nurses’ justifications for restraint use in neurosurgical care. RESEARCH DESIGN: A qualitative, descriptive design was used. Data were analysed with inductive qualitative content analysis. PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT: Semi-structured interviews with 15 nurses working in three neurosurgical departments in Sweden. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: Approved by The Regional Ethics Committee, Stockholm, Sweden. FINDINGS: The analysis resulted in three categories. The category Patient factors influencing restraint use describes patient factors that trigger restraint, such as a diminished decision-making competence, restlessness, and need for invasive devices. The category Specific reasons for justifying restraint describes reasons for restraining patients, such as restraint being used for the sake of the patient or for the sake of others. The category General reasoning in justifying restraint describes how nurses reason when using restraint, and the decision to use restraint was often based on a consequentialist approach where the nurses’ weighed the pros and cons of different alternatives. DISCUSSION: Nurses with experience of restraint use were engaged in a constant process of justifying and balancing different options and actions. Restraint was considered legitimate if the benefit exceeded the suffering, but decisions on which restraint measures to use and when to use them depended on the values of the individual nurse. CONCLUSION: How nurses reason when justifying restraint, why they use restraint, and who they use restraint on must be considered when creating programs and guidelines to reduce the use of restraint and to ensure that when it is used it is used carefully, appropriately, and with respect. SAGE Publications 2022-10-20 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9902980/ /pubmed/36266990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09697330221111447 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Manuscripts Guenna Holmgren, Amina von Vogelsang, Ann-Christin Lindblad, Anna Juth, Niklas Understanding nurses’ justification of restraint in a neurosurgical setting: A qualitative interview study |
title | Understanding nurses’ justification of restraint in a neurosurgical setting: A qualitative interview study |
title_full | Understanding nurses’ justification of restraint in a neurosurgical setting: A qualitative interview study |
title_fullStr | Understanding nurses’ justification of restraint in a neurosurgical setting: A qualitative interview study |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding nurses’ justification of restraint in a neurosurgical setting: A qualitative interview study |
title_short | Understanding nurses’ justification of restraint in a neurosurgical setting: A qualitative interview study |
title_sort | understanding nurses’ justification of restraint in a neurosurgical setting: a qualitative interview study |
topic | Original Manuscripts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9902980/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36266990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09697330221111447 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guennaholmgrenamina understandingnursesjustificationofrestraintinaneurosurgicalsettingaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT vonvogelsangannchristin understandingnursesjustificationofrestraintinaneurosurgicalsettingaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT lindbladanna understandingnursesjustificationofrestraintinaneurosurgicalsettingaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT juthniklas understandingnursesjustificationofrestraintinaneurosurgicalsettingaqualitativeinterviewstudy |