Cargando…

Understanding nurses’ justification of restraint in a neurosurgical setting: A qualitative interview study

BACKGROUND: Despite its negative impact on patients and nurses, the use of restraint in somatic health care continues in many settings. Understanding the reasons and justifications for the use of restraint among nurses is crucial in order to manage this challenge. AIM: To understand nurses’ justific...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guenna Holmgren, Amina, von Vogelsang, Ann-Christin, Lindblad, Anna, Juth, Niklas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9902980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36266990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09697330221111447
_version_ 1784883377946492928
author Guenna Holmgren, Amina
von Vogelsang, Ann-Christin
Lindblad, Anna
Juth, Niklas
author_facet Guenna Holmgren, Amina
von Vogelsang, Ann-Christin
Lindblad, Anna
Juth, Niklas
author_sort Guenna Holmgren, Amina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite its negative impact on patients and nurses, the use of restraint in somatic health care continues in many settings. Understanding the reasons and justifications for the use of restraint among nurses is crucial in order to manage this challenge. AIM: To understand nurses’ justifications for restraint use in neurosurgical care. RESEARCH DESIGN: A qualitative, descriptive design was used. Data were analysed with inductive qualitative content analysis. PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT: Semi-structured interviews with 15 nurses working in three neurosurgical departments in Sweden. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: Approved by The Regional Ethics Committee, Stockholm, Sweden. FINDINGS: The analysis resulted in three categories. The category Patient factors influencing restraint use describes patient factors that trigger restraint, such as a diminished decision-making competence, restlessness, and need for invasive devices. The category Specific reasons for justifying restraint describes reasons for restraining patients, such as restraint being used for the sake of the patient or for the sake of others. The category General reasoning in justifying restraint describes how nurses reason when using restraint, and the decision to use restraint was often based on a consequentialist approach where the nurses’ weighed the pros and cons of different alternatives. DISCUSSION: Nurses with experience of restraint use were engaged in a constant process of justifying and balancing different options and actions. Restraint was considered legitimate if the benefit exceeded the suffering, but decisions on which restraint measures to use and when to use them depended on the values of the individual nurse. CONCLUSION: How nurses reason when justifying restraint, why they use restraint, and who they use restraint on must be considered when creating programs and guidelines to reduce the use of restraint and to ensure that when it is used it is used carefully, appropriately, and with respect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9902980
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99029802023-02-08 Understanding nurses’ justification of restraint in a neurosurgical setting: A qualitative interview study Guenna Holmgren, Amina von Vogelsang, Ann-Christin Lindblad, Anna Juth, Niklas Nurs Ethics Original Manuscripts BACKGROUND: Despite its negative impact on patients and nurses, the use of restraint in somatic health care continues in many settings. Understanding the reasons and justifications for the use of restraint among nurses is crucial in order to manage this challenge. AIM: To understand nurses’ justifications for restraint use in neurosurgical care. RESEARCH DESIGN: A qualitative, descriptive design was used. Data were analysed with inductive qualitative content analysis. PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT: Semi-structured interviews with 15 nurses working in three neurosurgical departments in Sweden. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: Approved by The Regional Ethics Committee, Stockholm, Sweden. FINDINGS: The analysis resulted in three categories. The category Patient factors influencing restraint use describes patient factors that trigger restraint, such as a diminished decision-making competence, restlessness, and need for invasive devices. The category Specific reasons for justifying restraint describes reasons for restraining patients, such as restraint being used for the sake of the patient or for the sake of others. The category General reasoning in justifying restraint describes how nurses reason when using restraint, and the decision to use restraint was often based on a consequentialist approach where the nurses’ weighed the pros and cons of different alternatives. DISCUSSION: Nurses with experience of restraint use were engaged in a constant process of justifying and balancing different options and actions. Restraint was considered legitimate if the benefit exceeded the suffering, but decisions on which restraint measures to use and when to use them depended on the values of the individual nurse. CONCLUSION: How nurses reason when justifying restraint, why they use restraint, and who they use restraint on must be considered when creating programs and guidelines to reduce the use of restraint and to ensure that when it is used it is used carefully, appropriately, and with respect. SAGE Publications 2022-10-20 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9902980/ /pubmed/36266990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09697330221111447 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Manuscripts
Guenna Holmgren, Amina
von Vogelsang, Ann-Christin
Lindblad, Anna
Juth, Niklas
Understanding nurses’ justification of restraint in a neurosurgical setting: A qualitative interview study
title Understanding nurses’ justification of restraint in a neurosurgical setting: A qualitative interview study
title_full Understanding nurses’ justification of restraint in a neurosurgical setting: A qualitative interview study
title_fullStr Understanding nurses’ justification of restraint in a neurosurgical setting: A qualitative interview study
title_full_unstemmed Understanding nurses’ justification of restraint in a neurosurgical setting: A qualitative interview study
title_short Understanding nurses’ justification of restraint in a neurosurgical setting: A qualitative interview study
title_sort understanding nurses’ justification of restraint in a neurosurgical setting: a qualitative interview study
topic Original Manuscripts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9902980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36266990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09697330221111447
work_keys_str_mv AT guennaholmgrenamina understandingnursesjustificationofrestraintinaneurosurgicalsettingaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT vonvogelsangannchristin understandingnursesjustificationofrestraintinaneurosurgicalsettingaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT lindbladanna understandingnursesjustificationofrestraintinaneurosurgicalsettingaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT juthniklas understandingnursesjustificationofrestraintinaneurosurgicalsettingaqualitativeinterviewstudy