Cargando…

Prognostic factors in endometrial cancer patients with bone metastasis

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to examine the pattern and prognosis of osseous involvement and the role of orthopedic surgery in patients with endometrial cancer (EC) and to evaluate the quality of life, local tumor control, and survival of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2011 and Decem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ozturk Basarir, Zehra, Karaca, Mustafa Onur, Balaban, Kamil, Basarir, Kerem, Yildiz, Huseyin Yusuf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9903106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36700284
http://dx.doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2023.792
_version_ 1784883407790014464
author Ozturk Basarir, Zehra
Karaca, Mustafa Onur
Balaban, Kamil
Basarir, Kerem
Yildiz, Huseyin Yusuf
author_facet Ozturk Basarir, Zehra
Karaca, Mustafa Onur
Balaban, Kamil
Basarir, Kerem
Yildiz, Huseyin Yusuf
author_sort Ozturk Basarir, Zehra
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aims to examine the pattern and prognosis of osseous involvement and the role of orthopedic surgery in patients with endometrial cancer (EC) and to evaluate the quality of life, local tumor control, and survival of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2011 and December 2018, a total of 14 patients (median age: 60.5 years; range, 55 to 73 years) who were surgically treated for osseous metastasis of EC and followed for minimum 12 months were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were evaluated for their primary malignancy, characteristics of bone metastasis, and type of treatment related to musculoskeletal involvement. For evaluating the functional outcomes, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status scale were used in the pre- and postoperative period. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 34.5 (range, 9 to 89) months. All patients had advanced-stage disease (FIGO Stage III-IV). Four patients had solitary and 10 patients had multiple bone metastases. The mean VAS score and ECOG performance status grades improved (p<0.001 and p<0.05, respectively). The median survival after detection of bone metastasis was 61 (range, 41 to 82) months. CONCLUSION: Endometrial cancer patients with musculoskeletal pain should be investigated for the possibility of bone metastasis to tailor a prompt treatment and to achieve a better prognosis. Appropriate surgical treatment of bone metastasis may improve both pain and performance status in carefully selected patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9903106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Bayçınar Medical Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99031062023-02-14 Prognostic factors in endometrial cancer patients with bone metastasis Ozturk Basarir, Zehra Karaca, Mustafa Onur Balaban, Kamil Basarir, Kerem Yildiz, Huseyin Yusuf Jt Dis Relat Surg Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study aims to examine the pattern and prognosis of osseous involvement and the role of orthopedic surgery in patients with endometrial cancer (EC) and to evaluate the quality of life, local tumor control, and survival of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2011 and December 2018, a total of 14 patients (median age: 60.5 years; range, 55 to 73 years) who were surgically treated for osseous metastasis of EC and followed for minimum 12 months were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were evaluated for their primary malignancy, characteristics of bone metastasis, and type of treatment related to musculoskeletal involvement. For evaluating the functional outcomes, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status scale were used in the pre- and postoperative period. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 34.5 (range, 9 to 89) months. All patients had advanced-stage disease (FIGO Stage III-IV). Four patients had solitary and 10 patients had multiple bone metastases. The mean VAS score and ECOG performance status grades improved (p<0.001 and p<0.05, respectively). The median survival after detection of bone metastasis was 61 (range, 41 to 82) months. CONCLUSION: Endometrial cancer patients with musculoskeletal pain should be investigated for the possibility of bone metastasis to tailor a prompt treatment and to achieve a better prognosis. Appropriate surgical treatment of bone metastasis may improve both pain and performance status in carefully selected patients. Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2023-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9903106/ /pubmed/36700284 http://dx.doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2023.792 Text en Copyright © 2023, Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ozturk Basarir, Zehra
Karaca, Mustafa Onur
Balaban, Kamil
Basarir, Kerem
Yildiz, Huseyin Yusuf
Prognostic factors in endometrial cancer patients with bone metastasis
title Prognostic factors in endometrial cancer patients with bone metastasis
title_full Prognostic factors in endometrial cancer patients with bone metastasis
title_fullStr Prognostic factors in endometrial cancer patients with bone metastasis
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic factors in endometrial cancer patients with bone metastasis
title_short Prognostic factors in endometrial cancer patients with bone metastasis
title_sort prognostic factors in endometrial cancer patients with bone metastasis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9903106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36700284
http://dx.doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2023.792
work_keys_str_mv AT ozturkbasarirzehra prognosticfactorsinendometrialcancerpatientswithbonemetastasis
AT karacamustafaonur prognosticfactorsinendometrialcancerpatientswithbonemetastasis
AT balabankamil prognosticfactorsinendometrialcancerpatientswithbonemetastasis
AT basarirkerem prognosticfactorsinendometrialcancerpatientswithbonemetastasis
AT yildizhuseyinyusuf prognosticfactorsinendometrialcancerpatientswithbonemetastasis