Cargando…

Testing the nonclinical Comprehensive In Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) paradigm with an established anti‐seizure medication: Levetiracetam case study

Levetiracetam (LEV), a well‐established anti‐seizure medication (ASM), was launched before the original ICH S7B nonclinical guidance assessing QT prolongation potential and the introduction of the Comprehensive In Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) paradigm. No information was available on its effects...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Delaunois, Annie, Mathy, François‐Xavier, Cornet, Miranda, Gryshkova, Vitalina, Korlowski, Chloé, Bonfitto, François, Koch, Juliane, Schlit, Anne‐Françoise, Hebeisen, Simon, Passini, Elisa, Rodriguez, Blanca, Valentin, Jean‐Pierre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9903303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36748725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.1059
_version_ 1784883446305259520
author Delaunois, Annie
Mathy, François‐Xavier
Cornet, Miranda
Gryshkova, Vitalina
Korlowski, Chloé
Bonfitto, François
Koch, Juliane
Schlit, Anne‐Françoise
Hebeisen, Simon
Passini, Elisa
Rodriguez, Blanca
Valentin, Jean‐Pierre
author_facet Delaunois, Annie
Mathy, François‐Xavier
Cornet, Miranda
Gryshkova, Vitalina
Korlowski, Chloé
Bonfitto, François
Koch, Juliane
Schlit, Anne‐Françoise
Hebeisen, Simon
Passini, Elisa
Rodriguez, Blanca
Valentin, Jean‐Pierre
author_sort Delaunois, Annie
collection PubMed
description Levetiracetam (LEV), a well‐established anti‐seizure medication (ASM), was launched before the original ICH S7B nonclinical guidance assessing QT prolongation potential and the introduction of the Comprehensive In Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) paradigm. No information was available on its effects on cardiac channels. The goal of this work was to “pressure test” the CiPA approach with LEV and check the concordance of nonclinical core and follow‐up S7B assays with clinical and post‐marketing data. The following experiments were conducted with LEV (0.25–7.5 mM): patch clamp assays on hERG (acute or trafficking effects), Na(V)1.5, Ca(V)1.2, K(ir)2.1, K(V)7.1/mink, K(V)1.5, K(V)4.3, and HCN4; in silico electrophysiology modeling (Virtual Assay® software) in control, large‐variability, and high‐risk human ventricular cell populations; electrophysiology measurements in human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)‐derived cardiomyocytes and dog Purkinje fibers; ECG measurements in conscious telemetered dogs after single oral administration (150, 300, and 600 mg/kg). Except a slight inhibition (<10%) of hERG and K(V)7.1/mink at 7.5 mM, that is, 30‐fold the free therapeutic plasma concentration (FTPC) at 1500 mg, LEV did not affect any other cardiac channels or hERG trafficking. In both virtual and real human cardiomyocytes, and in dog Purkinje fibers, LEV induced no relevant changes in electrophysiological parameters or arrhythmia. No QTc prolongation was noted up to 2.7 mM unbound plasma levels in conscious dogs, corresponding to 10‐fold the FTPC. Nonclinical assessment integrating CiPA assays shows the absence of QT prolongation and proarrhythmic risk of LEV up to at least 10‐fold the FTPC and the good concordance with clinical and postmarketing data, although this does not exclude very rare occurrence of QT prolongation cases in patients with underlying risk factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9903303
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99033032023-02-09 Testing the nonclinical Comprehensive In Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) paradigm with an established anti‐seizure medication: Levetiracetam case study Delaunois, Annie Mathy, François‐Xavier Cornet, Miranda Gryshkova, Vitalina Korlowski, Chloé Bonfitto, François Koch, Juliane Schlit, Anne‐Françoise Hebeisen, Simon Passini, Elisa Rodriguez, Blanca Valentin, Jean‐Pierre Pharmacol Res Perspect Original Articles Levetiracetam (LEV), a well‐established anti‐seizure medication (ASM), was launched before the original ICH S7B nonclinical guidance assessing QT prolongation potential and the introduction of the Comprehensive In Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) paradigm. No information was available on its effects on cardiac channels. The goal of this work was to “pressure test” the CiPA approach with LEV and check the concordance of nonclinical core and follow‐up S7B assays with clinical and post‐marketing data. The following experiments were conducted with LEV (0.25–7.5 mM): patch clamp assays on hERG (acute or trafficking effects), Na(V)1.5, Ca(V)1.2, K(ir)2.1, K(V)7.1/mink, K(V)1.5, K(V)4.3, and HCN4; in silico electrophysiology modeling (Virtual Assay® software) in control, large‐variability, and high‐risk human ventricular cell populations; electrophysiology measurements in human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)‐derived cardiomyocytes and dog Purkinje fibers; ECG measurements in conscious telemetered dogs after single oral administration (150, 300, and 600 mg/kg). Except a slight inhibition (<10%) of hERG and K(V)7.1/mink at 7.5 mM, that is, 30‐fold the free therapeutic plasma concentration (FTPC) at 1500 mg, LEV did not affect any other cardiac channels or hERG trafficking. In both virtual and real human cardiomyocytes, and in dog Purkinje fibers, LEV induced no relevant changes in electrophysiological parameters or arrhythmia. No QTc prolongation was noted up to 2.7 mM unbound plasma levels in conscious dogs, corresponding to 10‐fold the FTPC. Nonclinical assessment integrating CiPA assays shows the absence of QT prolongation and proarrhythmic risk of LEV up to at least 10‐fold the FTPC and the good concordance with clinical and postmarketing data, although this does not exclude very rare occurrence of QT prolongation cases in patients with underlying risk factors. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9903303/ /pubmed/36748725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.1059 Text en © 2023 UCB Biopharma SRL. Pharmacology Research & Perspectives published by British Pharmacological Society and American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Delaunois, Annie
Mathy, François‐Xavier
Cornet, Miranda
Gryshkova, Vitalina
Korlowski, Chloé
Bonfitto, François
Koch, Juliane
Schlit, Anne‐Françoise
Hebeisen, Simon
Passini, Elisa
Rodriguez, Blanca
Valentin, Jean‐Pierre
Testing the nonclinical Comprehensive In Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) paradigm with an established anti‐seizure medication: Levetiracetam case study
title Testing the nonclinical Comprehensive In Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) paradigm with an established anti‐seizure medication: Levetiracetam case study
title_full Testing the nonclinical Comprehensive In Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) paradigm with an established anti‐seizure medication: Levetiracetam case study
title_fullStr Testing the nonclinical Comprehensive In Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) paradigm with an established anti‐seizure medication: Levetiracetam case study
title_full_unstemmed Testing the nonclinical Comprehensive In Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) paradigm with an established anti‐seizure medication: Levetiracetam case study
title_short Testing the nonclinical Comprehensive In Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) paradigm with an established anti‐seizure medication: Levetiracetam case study
title_sort testing the nonclinical comprehensive in vitro proarrhythmia assay (cipa) paradigm with an established anti‐seizure medication: levetiracetam case study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9903303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36748725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.1059
work_keys_str_mv AT delaunoisannie testingthenonclinicalcomprehensiveinvitroproarrhythmiaassaycipaparadigmwithanestablishedantiseizuremedicationlevetiracetamcasestudy
AT mathyfrancoisxavier testingthenonclinicalcomprehensiveinvitroproarrhythmiaassaycipaparadigmwithanestablishedantiseizuremedicationlevetiracetamcasestudy
AT cornetmiranda testingthenonclinicalcomprehensiveinvitroproarrhythmiaassaycipaparadigmwithanestablishedantiseizuremedicationlevetiracetamcasestudy
AT gryshkovavitalina testingthenonclinicalcomprehensiveinvitroproarrhythmiaassaycipaparadigmwithanestablishedantiseizuremedicationlevetiracetamcasestudy
AT korlowskichloe testingthenonclinicalcomprehensiveinvitroproarrhythmiaassaycipaparadigmwithanestablishedantiseizuremedicationlevetiracetamcasestudy
AT bonfittofrancois testingthenonclinicalcomprehensiveinvitroproarrhythmiaassaycipaparadigmwithanestablishedantiseizuremedicationlevetiracetamcasestudy
AT kochjuliane testingthenonclinicalcomprehensiveinvitroproarrhythmiaassaycipaparadigmwithanestablishedantiseizuremedicationlevetiracetamcasestudy
AT schlitannefrancoise testingthenonclinicalcomprehensiveinvitroproarrhythmiaassaycipaparadigmwithanestablishedantiseizuremedicationlevetiracetamcasestudy
AT hebeisensimon testingthenonclinicalcomprehensiveinvitroproarrhythmiaassaycipaparadigmwithanestablishedantiseizuremedicationlevetiracetamcasestudy
AT passinielisa testingthenonclinicalcomprehensiveinvitroproarrhythmiaassaycipaparadigmwithanestablishedantiseizuremedicationlevetiracetamcasestudy
AT rodriguezblanca testingthenonclinicalcomprehensiveinvitroproarrhythmiaassaycipaparadigmwithanestablishedantiseizuremedicationlevetiracetamcasestudy
AT valentinjeanpierre testingthenonclinicalcomprehensiveinvitroproarrhythmiaassaycipaparadigmwithanestablishedantiseizuremedicationlevetiracetamcasestudy