Cargando…

Relevant factors of posterior mandible lingual plate perforation during immediate implant placement: a virtual implant placement study using CBCT

BACKGROUND: To explore the influence of cross-sectional type and morphological parameters at the mandibular molar sites on lingual plate perforation (LPP) during the immediate implant placement (IIP). METHODS: 181 implants were virtually placed in the mandibular molar sites on the cone beam computed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Yingjia, Hu, Sai, Xie, Zhijian, Zhou, Yiqun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9903431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36747164
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02696-z
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: To explore the influence of cross-sectional type and morphological parameters at the mandibular molar sites on lingual plate perforation (LPP) during the immediate implant placement (IIP). METHODS: 181 implants were virtually placed in the mandibular molar sites on the cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Each cross-section of the implantation site was divided into the Undercut (U)/Parallel (P)/Convex (C) types. Morphologically relevant parameters were measured on the cross-sections, including width of the upper end (Wb), width of the lower end (Wc), vertical height (V), angle between the natural crown axis and the alveolar bone axis (∠β), LC depth (LCD), LC height, and angle between the horizontal line and the line connecting the most prominent point and the most concave point of lingual plate (∠α). Besides, the distance from the end of the virtual implant and the lingual bone plate of the cross-section (D(IL)) was calculated. Relationships between all the morphologically relevant parameters and the D(IL) were further analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 77 (42.5%) cross-sections were classified as U-type, which was the most common one, accounting for 63% of the second molar regions. All LPP cases and most of the nearly LPP (87.9%) cases occurred at the U-type cross-sections, and the relationship between the D(IL) and the morphological parameters can be expressed by a multivariate linear equation. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence rate of U-type cross-sections in the second molar region was very high, and the risk of LPP should be considered during IIP. Except for the U-type, significant large LCD, small Wc, and large ∠β were the important relevant factors. CBCT and multivariate linear equations could help to assess the LPP risk and provide a reference for implant placement design pre-surgery.