Cargando…

The prevalence of orthorexia in exercising populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM: Orthorexia Nervosa (ON) describes a pathological obsession with proper and high-quality nutrition that is necessary to research further in order to elucidate its prevalence and correlates which may bear implications for prevention and treatment. The aim of this study was to review studies that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hafstad, Stine Marie, Bauer, Jonas, Harris, Anette, Pallesen, Ståle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9903632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36747235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40337-023-00739-6
_version_ 1784883506752520192
author Hafstad, Stine Marie
Bauer, Jonas
Harris, Anette
Pallesen, Ståle
author_facet Hafstad, Stine Marie
Bauer, Jonas
Harris, Anette
Pallesen, Ståle
author_sort Hafstad, Stine Marie
collection PubMed
description AIM: Orthorexia Nervosa (ON) describes a pathological obsession with proper and high-quality nutrition that is necessary to research further in order to elucidate its prevalence and correlates which may bear implications for prevention and treatment. The aim of this study was to review studies that report the prevalence of ON in people who exercise, calculate an overall prevalence through a random-effects meta-analysis approach and investigate the association of ON prevalence using a random-effects meta-regression. In addition, a sub-group-analysis based on ON-instruments and a sensitivity analysis excluding students samples, were conducted. METHOD: Systematic searches were conducted in the following online databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PsychInfo, CINAHL, Google Scholar and OpenNet. The following search terms were used: Orthore* AND (prevalenc* OR incidenc* OR frequen* OR cut-off OR epidem*). A total of 613 unique hits were reviewed by two blinded authors, and 24 studies were coded and assessed for risk of bias (Holy et.al). The meta-regression included three independent variables (sex, type of sport, and sample size). RESULTS: The overall prevalence of ON in the exercising population was 55.3% (95% CI 43.2–66.8). Cochran’s Q was 11,436.38 (df = 23, p < 0.0000), and the I(2) was 98.4%, indicating high heterogeneity across studies. The sensitivity showed an overall prevalence of 51.3% (95% CI 51.3–70.0). There was a significant difference in prevalence estimates based on the instruments used (Q(bet) = 33.6, df = 2, p < 0.01). DISCUSSION: The overall prevalence of ON in exercising populations was very high. The between-study disparity was large and was partly explained by the ON-instrument administered. One fourth of the studies had a moderate risk of bias. The majority of the studies did not specify relevant demographic information about the sample, and information about the type of sport was frequently missing. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40337-023-00739-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9903632
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99036322023-02-08 The prevalence of orthorexia in exercising populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hafstad, Stine Marie Bauer, Jonas Harris, Anette Pallesen, Ståle J Eat Disord Review AIM: Orthorexia Nervosa (ON) describes a pathological obsession with proper and high-quality nutrition that is necessary to research further in order to elucidate its prevalence and correlates which may bear implications for prevention and treatment. The aim of this study was to review studies that report the prevalence of ON in people who exercise, calculate an overall prevalence through a random-effects meta-analysis approach and investigate the association of ON prevalence using a random-effects meta-regression. In addition, a sub-group-analysis based on ON-instruments and a sensitivity analysis excluding students samples, were conducted. METHOD: Systematic searches were conducted in the following online databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PsychInfo, CINAHL, Google Scholar and OpenNet. The following search terms were used: Orthore* AND (prevalenc* OR incidenc* OR frequen* OR cut-off OR epidem*). A total of 613 unique hits were reviewed by two blinded authors, and 24 studies were coded and assessed for risk of bias (Holy et.al). The meta-regression included three independent variables (sex, type of sport, and sample size). RESULTS: The overall prevalence of ON in the exercising population was 55.3% (95% CI 43.2–66.8). Cochran’s Q was 11,436.38 (df = 23, p < 0.0000), and the I(2) was 98.4%, indicating high heterogeneity across studies. The sensitivity showed an overall prevalence of 51.3% (95% CI 51.3–70.0). There was a significant difference in prevalence estimates based on the instruments used (Q(bet) = 33.6, df = 2, p < 0.01). DISCUSSION: The overall prevalence of ON in exercising populations was very high. The between-study disparity was large and was partly explained by the ON-instrument administered. One fourth of the studies had a moderate risk of bias. The majority of the studies did not specify relevant demographic information about the sample, and information about the type of sport was frequently missing. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40337-023-00739-6. BioMed Central 2023-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9903632/ /pubmed/36747235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40337-023-00739-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Hafstad, Stine Marie
Bauer, Jonas
Harris, Anette
Pallesen, Ståle
The prevalence of orthorexia in exercising populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title The prevalence of orthorexia in exercising populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The prevalence of orthorexia in exercising populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The prevalence of orthorexia in exercising populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The prevalence of orthorexia in exercising populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The prevalence of orthorexia in exercising populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort prevalence of orthorexia in exercising populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9903632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36747235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40337-023-00739-6
work_keys_str_mv AT hafstadstinemarie theprevalenceoforthorexiainexercisingpopulationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bauerjonas theprevalenceoforthorexiainexercisingpopulationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT harrisanette theprevalenceoforthorexiainexercisingpopulationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pallesenstale theprevalenceoforthorexiainexercisingpopulationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hafstadstinemarie prevalenceoforthorexiainexercisingpopulationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bauerjonas prevalenceoforthorexiainexercisingpopulationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT harrisanette prevalenceoforthorexiainexercisingpopulationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pallesenstale prevalenceoforthorexiainexercisingpopulationsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis