Cargando…

Disparities in adherence to diabetes screening guidelines among males and females in a universal care setting: A population-based study of 1,380,697 adults

BACKGROUND: National guidelines recommend that all adults over the age of 40 years undergo screening for diabetes at least once every 3-years. We examined the adherence to these guidelines among males and females after accounting for age, urban/rural residence, and material deprivation. We also exam...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaul, Padma, Chu, Luan Manh, Dover, Douglas C., Yeung, Roseanne O., Eurich, Dean T., Butalia, Sonia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9904035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36777395
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2022.100320
_version_ 1784883549736796160
author Kaul, Padma
Chu, Luan Manh
Dover, Douglas C.
Yeung, Roseanne O.
Eurich, Dean T.
Butalia, Sonia
author_facet Kaul, Padma
Chu, Luan Manh
Dover, Douglas C.
Yeung, Roseanne O.
Eurich, Dean T.
Butalia, Sonia
author_sort Kaul, Padma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: National guidelines recommend that all adults over the age of 40 years undergo screening for diabetes at least once every 3-years. We examined the adherence to these guidelines among males and females after accounting for age, urban/rural residence, and material deprivation. We also examined the incidence of prediabetes and diabetes in adherent and non-adherent individuals. METHODS: Our study is based on a retrospective population-level inception cohort of adults aged 40–79 years without pre-existing diabetes or cardiovascular disease on April 1, 2013. Adherence during a 3-year screening period (2013–2016) and prediabetes and diabetes during a 4-year follow-up period were examined. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the adjusted association between sex and adherence. FINDINGS: Among 1,380,697 individuals (49·2% male, 50·8% female) adherence rates were 69·9% in males and 79·8% in females. Sex-differences in adherence were largest in younger individuals (58·0% and 72·6% and in males and females aged 40–44 years, respectively) and consistent across rural/urban residence and material deprivation. Females were more adherent (adjusted odds ratio 1·92; 95% confidence interval 1·89 to 1·95) than males. Prediabetes and diabetes rates among individuals who adhered to screening guidelines were 15·7% and 2·6% among males and 13·4% and 1·5% among females. During the follow-up period, an additional 3·2% and 1·9% of adherent males and females had diabetes. Incidence rates of prediabetes and diabetes during the follow-up period among individuals who did not adhere to screening guidelines were 8·8% and 2·1% among males and 7·3% and 1·3% among females. INTERPRETATION: Adherence to diabetes screening guidelines is sub-optimal, especially among young males. Despite lower rates of adherence to screening, males have higher rates of prediabetes and diabetes compared to females. There is a need for education campaigns to improve diabetes screening rates in young adults, especially males. FUNDING: This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Sex and Gender Science Chair (Recipient: Kaul).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9904035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99040352023-02-10 Disparities in adherence to diabetes screening guidelines among males and females in a universal care setting: A population-based study of 1,380,697 adults Kaul, Padma Chu, Luan Manh Dover, Douglas C. Yeung, Roseanne O. Eurich, Dean T. Butalia, Sonia Lancet Reg Health Am Articles BACKGROUND: National guidelines recommend that all adults over the age of 40 years undergo screening for diabetes at least once every 3-years. We examined the adherence to these guidelines among males and females after accounting for age, urban/rural residence, and material deprivation. We also examined the incidence of prediabetes and diabetes in adherent and non-adherent individuals. METHODS: Our study is based on a retrospective population-level inception cohort of adults aged 40–79 years without pre-existing diabetes or cardiovascular disease on April 1, 2013. Adherence during a 3-year screening period (2013–2016) and prediabetes and diabetes during a 4-year follow-up period were examined. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the adjusted association between sex and adherence. FINDINGS: Among 1,380,697 individuals (49·2% male, 50·8% female) adherence rates were 69·9% in males and 79·8% in females. Sex-differences in adherence were largest in younger individuals (58·0% and 72·6% and in males and females aged 40–44 years, respectively) and consistent across rural/urban residence and material deprivation. Females were more adherent (adjusted odds ratio 1·92; 95% confidence interval 1·89 to 1·95) than males. Prediabetes and diabetes rates among individuals who adhered to screening guidelines were 15·7% and 2·6% among males and 13·4% and 1·5% among females. During the follow-up period, an additional 3·2% and 1·9% of adherent males and females had diabetes. Incidence rates of prediabetes and diabetes during the follow-up period among individuals who did not adhere to screening guidelines were 8·8% and 2·1% among males and 7·3% and 1·3% among females. INTERPRETATION: Adherence to diabetes screening guidelines is sub-optimal, especially among young males. Despite lower rates of adherence to screening, males have higher rates of prediabetes and diabetes compared to females. There is a need for education campaigns to improve diabetes screening rates in young adults, especially males. FUNDING: This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Sex and Gender Science Chair (Recipient: Kaul). Elsevier 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9904035/ /pubmed/36777395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2022.100320 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Kaul, Padma
Chu, Luan Manh
Dover, Douglas C.
Yeung, Roseanne O.
Eurich, Dean T.
Butalia, Sonia
Disparities in adherence to diabetes screening guidelines among males and females in a universal care setting: A population-based study of 1,380,697 adults
title Disparities in adherence to diabetes screening guidelines among males and females in a universal care setting: A population-based study of 1,380,697 adults
title_full Disparities in adherence to diabetes screening guidelines among males and females in a universal care setting: A population-based study of 1,380,697 adults
title_fullStr Disparities in adherence to diabetes screening guidelines among males and females in a universal care setting: A population-based study of 1,380,697 adults
title_full_unstemmed Disparities in adherence to diabetes screening guidelines among males and females in a universal care setting: A population-based study of 1,380,697 adults
title_short Disparities in adherence to diabetes screening guidelines among males and females in a universal care setting: A population-based study of 1,380,697 adults
title_sort disparities in adherence to diabetes screening guidelines among males and females in a universal care setting: a population-based study of 1,380,697 adults
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9904035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36777395
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2022.100320
work_keys_str_mv AT kaulpadma disparitiesinadherencetodiabetesscreeningguidelinesamongmalesandfemalesinauniversalcaresettingapopulationbasedstudyof1380697adults
AT chuluanmanh disparitiesinadherencetodiabetesscreeningguidelinesamongmalesandfemalesinauniversalcaresettingapopulationbasedstudyof1380697adults
AT doverdouglasc disparitiesinadherencetodiabetesscreeningguidelinesamongmalesandfemalesinauniversalcaresettingapopulationbasedstudyof1380697adults
AT yeungroseanneo disparitiesinadherencetodiabetesscreeningguidelinesamongmalesandfemalesinauniversalcaresettingapopulationbasedstudyof1380697adults
AT eurichdeant disparitiesinadherencetodiabetesscreeningguidelinesamongmalesandfemalesinauniversalcaresettingapopulationbasedstudyof1380697adults
AT butaliasonia disparitiesinadherencetodiabetesscreeningguidelinesamongmalesandfemalesinauniversalcaresettingapopulationbasedstudyof1380697adults