Cargando…
Disparities in adherence to diabetes screening guidelines among males and females in a universal care setting: A population-based study of 1,380,697 adults
BACKGROUND: National guidelines recommend that all adults over the age of 40 years undergo screening for diabetes at least once every 3-years. We examined the adherence to these guidelines among males and females after accounting for age, urban/rural residence, and material deprivation. We also exam...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9904035/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36777395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2022.100320 |
_version_ | 1784883549736796160 |
---|---|
author | Kaul, Padma Chu, Luan Manh Dover, Douglas C. Yeung, Roseanne O. Eurich, Dean T. Butalia, Sonia |
author_facet | Kaul, Padma Chu, Luan Manh Dover, Douglas C. Yeung, Roseanne O. Eurich, Dean T. Butalia, Sonia |
author_sort | Kaul, Padma |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: National guidelines recommend that all adults over the age of 40 years undergo screening for diabetes at least once every 3-years. We examined the adherence to these guidelines among males and females after accounting for age, urban/rural residence, and material deprivation. We also examined the incidence of prediabetes and diabetes in adherent and non-adherent individuals. METHODS: Our study is based on a retrospective population-level inception cohort of adults aged 40–79 years without pre-existing diabetes or cardiovascular disease on April 1, 2013. Adherence during a 3-year screening period (2013–2016) and prediabetes and diabetes during a 4-year follow-up period were examined. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the adjusted association between sex and adherence. FINDINGS: Among 1,380,697 individuals (49·2% male, 50·8% female) adherence rates were 69·9% in males and 79·8% in females. Sex-differences in adherence were largest in younger individuals (58·0% and 72·6% and in males and females aged 40–44 years, respectively) and consistent across rural/urban residence and material deprivation. Females were more adherent (adjusted odds ratio 1·92; 95% confidence interval 1·89 to 1·95) than males. Prediabetes and diabetes rates among individuals who adhered to screening guidelines were 15·7% and 2·6% among males and 13·4% and 1·5% among females. During the follow-up period, an additional 3·2% and 1·9% of adherent males and females had diabetes. Incidence rates of prediabetes and diabetes during the follow-up period among individuals who did not adhere to screening guidelines were 8·8% and 2·1% among males and 7·3% and 1·3% among females. INTERPRETATION: Adherence to diabetes screening guidelines is sub-optimal, especially among young males. Despite lower rates of adherence to screening, males have higher rates of prediabetes and diabetes compared to females. There is a need for education campaigns to improve diabetes screening rates in young adults, especially males. FUNDING: This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Sex and Gender Science Chair (Recipient: Kaul). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9904035 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99040352023-02-10 Disparities in adherence to diabetes screening guidelines among males and females in a universal care setting: A population-based study of 1,380,697 adults Kaul, Padma Chu, Luan Manh Dover, Douglas C. Yeung, Roseanne O. Eurich, Dean T. Butalia, Sonia Lancet Reg Health Am Articles BACKGROUND: National guidelines recommend that all adults over the age of 40 years undergo screening for diabetes at least once every 3-years. We examined the adherence to these guidelines among males and females after accounting for age, urban/rural residence, and material deprivation. We also examined the incidence of prediabetes and diabetes in adherent and non-adherent individuals. METHODS: Our study is based on a retrospective population-level inception cohort of adults aged 40–79 years without pre-existing diabetes or cardiovascular disease on April 1, 2013. Adherence during a 3-year screening period (2013–2016) and prediabetes and diabetes during a 4-year follow-up period were examined. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the adjusted association between sex and adherence. FINDINGS: Among 1,380,697 individuals (49·2% male, 50·8% female) adherence rates were 69·9% in males and 79·8% in females. Sex-differences in adherence were largest in younger individuals (58·0% and 72·6% and in males and females aged 40–44 years, respectively) and consistent across rural/urban residence and material deprivation. Females were more adherent (adjusted odds ratio 1·92; 95% confidence interval 1·89 to 1·95) than males. Prediabetes and diabetes rates among individuals who adhered to screening guidelines were 15·7% and 2·6% among males and 13·4% and 1·5% among females. During the follow-up period, an additional 3·2% and 1·9% of adherent males and females had diabetes. Incidence rates of prediabetes and diabetes during the follow-up period among individuals who did not adhere to screening guidelines were 8·8% and 2·1% among males and 7·3% and 1·3% among females. INTERPRETATION: Adherence to diabetes screening guidelines is sub-optimal, especially among young males. Despite lower rates of adherence to screening, males have higher rates of prediabetes and diabetes compared to females. There is a need for education campaigns to improve diabetes screening rates in young adults, especially males. FUNDING: This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Sex and Gender Science Chair (Recipient: Kaul). Elsevier 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9904035/ /pubmed/36777395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2022.100320 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Articles Kaul, Padma Chu, Luan Manh Dover, Douglas C. Yeung, Roseanne O. Eurich, Dean T. Butalia, Sonia Disparities in adherence to diabetes screening guidelines among males and females in a universal care setting: A population-based study of 1,380,697 adults |
title | Disparities in adherence to diabetes screening guidelines among males and females in a universal care setting: A population-based study of 1,380,697 adults |
title_full | Disparities in adherence to diabetes screening guidelines among males and females in a universal care setting: A population-based study of 1,380,697 adults |
title_fullStr | Disparities in adherence to diabetes screening guidelines among males and females in a universal care setting: A population-based study of 1,380,697 adults |
title_full_unstemmed | Disparities in adherence to diabetes screening guidelines among males and females in a universal care setting: A population-based study of 1,380,697 adults |
title_short | Disparities in adherence to diabetes screening guidelines among males and females in a universal care setting: A population-based study of 1,380,697 adults |
title_sort | disparities in adherence to diabetes screening guidelines among males and females in a universal care setting: a population-based study of 1,380,697 adults |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9904035/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36777395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2022.100320 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaulpadma disparitiesinadherencetodiabetesscreeningguidelinesamongmalesandfemalesinauniversalcaresettingapopulationbasedstudyof1380697adults AT chuluanmanh disparitiesinadherencetodiabetesscreeningguidelinesamongmalesandfemalesinauniversalcaresettingapopulationbasedstudyof1380697adults AT doverdouglasc disparitiesinadherencetodiabetesscreeningguidelinesamongmalesandfemalesinauniversalcaresettingapopulationbasedstudyof1380697adults AT yeungroseanneo disparitiesinadherencetodiabetesscreeningguidelinesamongmalesandfemalesinauniversalcaresettingapopulationbasedstudyof1380697adults AT eurichdeant disparitiesinadherencetodiabetesscreeningguidelinesamongmalesandfemalesinauniversalcaresettingapopulationbasedstudyof1380697adults AT butaliasonia disparitiesinadherencetodiabetesscreeningguidelinesamongmalesandfemalesinauniversalcaresettingapopulationbasedstudyof1380697adults |