Cargando…
Evaluation of chest X-ray with automated interpretation algorithms for mass tuberculosis screening in prisons: a cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends systematic tuberculosis (TB) screening in prisons. Evidence is lacking for accurate and scalable screening approaches in this setting. We aimed to assess the accuracy of artificial intelligence-based chest x-ray interpretation algorithms for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9904090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36776567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2022.100388 |
_version_ | 1784883555842654208 |
---|---|
author | Soares, Thiego Ramon Oliveira, Roberto Dias de Liu, Yiran E. Santos, Andrea da Silva Santos, Paulo Cesar Pereira dos Monte, Luma Ravena Soares Oliveira, Lissandra Maia de Park, Chang Min Hwang, Eui Jin Andrews, Jason R. Croda, Julio |
author_facet | Soares, Thiego Ramon Oliveira, Roberto Dias de Liu, Yiran E. Santos, Andrea da Silva Santos, Paulo Cesar Pereira dos Monte, Luma Ravena Soares Oliveira, Lissandra Maia de Park, Chang Min Hwang, Eui Jin Andrews, Jason R. Croda, Julio |
author_sort | Soares, Thiego Ramon |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends systematic tuberculosis (TB) screening in prisons. Evidence is lacking for accurate and scalable screening approaches in this setting. We aimed to assess the accuracy of artificial intelligence-based chest x-ray interpretation algorithms for TB screening in prisons. METHODS: We performed prospective TB screening in three male prisons in Brazil from October 2017 to December 2019. We administered a standardized questionnaire, performed a chest x-ray in a mobile unit, and collected sputum for confirmatory testing using Xpert MTB/RIF and culture. We evaluated x-ray images using three algorithms (CAD4TB version 6, Lunit version 3.1.0.0 and qXR version 3) and compared their accuracy. We utilized multivariable logistic regression to assess the effect of demographic and clinical characteristics on algorithm accuracy. Finally, we investigated the relationship between abnormality scores and Xpert semi-quantitative results. FINDINGS: Among 2075 incarcerated individuals, 259 (12.5%) had confirmed TB. All three algorithms performed similarly overall with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.88–0.91. At 90% sensitivity, only LunitTB and qXR met the WHO Target Product Profile requirements for a triage test, with specificity of 84% and 74%, respectively. All algorithms had variable performance by age, prior TB, smoking, and presence of TB symptoms. LunitTB was the most robust to this heterogeneity but nonetheless failed to meet the TPP for individuals with previous TB. Abnormality scores of all three algorithms were significantly correlated with sputum bacillary load. INTERPRETATION: Automated x-ray interpretation algorithms can be an effective triage tool for TB screening in prisons. However, their specificity is insufficient in individuals with previous TB. FUNDING: This study was supported by the US National Institutes of Health (grant numbers R01 AI130058 and R01 AI149620) and the State Secretary of Health of Mato Grosso do Sul. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9904090 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99040902023-02-10 Evaluation of chest X-ray with automated interpretation algorithms for mass tuberculosis screening in prisons: a cross-sectional study Soares, Thiego Ramon Oliveira, Roberto Dias de Liu, Yiran E. Santos, Andrea da Silva Santos, Paulo Cesar Pereira dos Monte, Luma Ravena Soares Oliveira, Lissandra Maia de Park, Chang Min Hwang, Eui Jin Andrews, Jason R. Croda, Julio Lancet Reg Health Am Articles BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends systematic tuberculosis (TB) screening in prisons. Evidence is lacking for accurate and scalable screening approaches in this setting. We aimed to assess the accuracy of artificial intelligence-based chest x-ray interpretation algorithms for TB screening in prisons. METHODS: We performed prospective TB screening in three male prisons in Brazil from October 2017 to December 2019. We administered a standardized questionnaire, performed a chest x-ray in a mobile unit, and collected sputum for confirmatory testing using Xpert MTB/RIF and culture. We evaluated x-ray images using three algorithms (CAD4TB version 6, Lunit version 3.1.0.0 and qXR version 3) and compared their accuracy. We utilized multivariable logistic regression to assess the effect of demographic and clinical characteristics on algorithm accuracy. Finally, we investigated the relationship between abnormality scores and Xpert semi-quantitative results. FINDINGS: Among 2075 incarcerated individuals, 259 (12.5%) had confirmed TB. All three algorithms performed similarly overall with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.88–0.91. At 90% sensitivity, only LunitTB and qXR met the WHO Target Product Profile requirements for a triage test, with specificity of 84% and 74%, respectively. All algorithms had variable performance by age, prior TB, smoking, and presence of TB symptoms. LunitTB was the most robust to this heterogeneity but nonetheless failed to meet the TPP for individuals with previous TB. Abnormality scores of all three algorithms were significantly correlated with sputum bacillary load. INTERPRETATION: Automated x-ray interpretation algorithms can be an effective triage tool for TB screening in prisons. However, their specificity is insufficient in individuals with previous TB. FUNDING: This study was supported by the US National Institutes of Health (grant numbers R01 AI130058 and R01 AI149620) and the State Secretary of Health of Mato Grosso do Sul. Elsevier 2022-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9904090/ /pubmed/36776567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2022.100388 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Articles Soares, Thiego Ramon Oliveira, Roberto Dias de Liu, Yiran E. Santos, Andrea da Silva Santos, Paulo Cesar Pereira dos Monte, Luma Ravena Soares Oliveira, Lissandra Maia de Park, Chang Min Hwang, Eui Jin Andrews, Jason R. Croda, Julio Evaluation of chest X-ray with automated interpretation algorithms for mass tuberculosis screening in prisons: a cross-sectional study |
title | Evaluation of chest X-ray with automated interpretation algorithms for mass tuberculosis screening in prisons: a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Evaluation of chest X-ray with automated interpretation algorithms for mass tuberculosis screening in prisons: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of chest X-ray with automated interpretation algorithms for mass tuberculosis screening in prisons: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of chest X-ray with automated interpretation algorithms for mass tuberculosis screening in prisons: a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Evaluation of chest X-ray with automated interpretation algorithms for mass tuberculosis screening in prisons: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | evaluation of chest x-ray with automated interpretation algorithms for mass tuberculosis screening in prisons: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9904090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36776567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2022.100388 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soaresthiegoramon evaluationofchestxraywithautomatedinterpretationalgorithmsformasstuberculosisscreeninginprisonsacrosssectionalstudy AT oliveirarobertodiasde evaluationofchestxraywithautomatedinterpretationalgorithmsformasstuberculosisscreeninginprisonsacrosssectionalstudy AT liuyirane evaluationofchestxraywithautomatedinterpretationalgorithmsformasstuberculosisscreeninginprisonsacrosssectionalstudy AT santosandreadasilva evaluationofchestxraywithautomatedinterpretationalgorithmsformasstuberculosisscreeninginprisonsacrosssectionalstudy AT santospaulocesarpereirados evaluationofchestxraywithautomatedinterpretationalgorithmsformasstuberculosisscreeninginprisonsacrosssectionalstudy AT montelumaravenasoares evaluationofchestxraywithautomatedinterpretationalgorithmsformasstuberculosisscreeninginprisonsacrosssectionalstudy AT oliveiralissandramaiade evaluationofchestxraywithautomatedinterpretationalgorithmsformasstuberculosisscreeninginprisonsacrosssectionalstudy AT parkchangmin evaluationofchestxraywithautomatedinterpretationalgorithmsformasstuberculosisscreeninginprisonsacrosssectionalstudy AT hwangeuijin evaluationofchestxraywithautomatedinterpretationalgorithmsformasstuberculosisscreeninginprisonsacrosssectionalstudy AT andrewsjasonr evaluationofchestxraywithautomatedinterpretationalgorithmsformasstuberculosisscreeninginprisonsacrosssectionalstudy AT crodajulio evaluationofchestxraywithautomatedinterpretationalgorithmsformasstuberculosisscreeninginprisonsacrosssectionalstudy |