Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness analysis of anlotinib versus sunitinib as first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in China
BACKGROUND: Sunitinib was approved several years ago as a first-line drug for treating metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC); however, its high price and broad side effects when administered at the standard dose have limited its clinical use. A clinical trial (NCT02072031) confirmed that anlotinib...
Autores principales: | Lin, Jingyang, Fang, Qingxia, Zheng, Xiaochun |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9904460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36749752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281402 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Cost-effectiveness of pazopanib versus sunitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the United Kingdom
por: Amdahl, Jordan, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Survival Benefits of Second-line Axitinib Versus Everolimus After First Line Sunitinib Treatment in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
por: Géczi, Lajos, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Outcomes of axitinib versus sunitinib as first‐line therapy to patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the immune‐oncology era
por: Numakura, Kazuyuki, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: First-Line Avelumab Plus Axitinib Versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma
por: Lu, Peiyao, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Cost-Effectiveness of Nivolumab Plus Cabozantinib Versus Sunitinib as a First-Line Treatment for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in the United States
por: Li, SiNi, et al.
Publicado: (2021)