Cargando…
Patient Outcomes and Unit Composition With Transition to a High-Intensity ICU Staffing Model: A Before-and-After Study
Provider staffing models for ICUs are generally based on pragmatic necessities and historical norms at individual institutions. A better understanding of the role that provider staffing models play in determining patient outcomes and optimizing use of ICU resources is needed. OBJECTIVES: To explore...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9904765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36778910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000864 |
_version_ | 1784883686972325888 |
---|---|
author | Proper, Jennifer L. Wacker, David A. Shaker, Salma Heisdorffer, Jamie Shaker, Rami M. Shiue, Larissa T. Pendleton, Kathryn M. Siegel, Lianne K. Reilkoff, Ronald A. |
author_facet | Proper, Jennifer L. Wacker, David A. Shaker, Salma Heisdorffer, Jamie Shaker, Rami M. Shiue, Larissa T. Pendleton, Kathryn M. Siegel, Lianne K. Reilkoff, Ronald A. |
author_sort | Proper, Jennifer L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Provider staffing models for ICUs are generally based on pragmatic necessities and historical norms at individual institutions. A better understanding of the role that provider staffing models play in determining patient outcomes and optimizing use of ICU resources is needed. OBJECTIVES: To explore the impact of transitioning from a low- to high-intensity intensivist staffing model on patient outcomes and unit composition. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a prospective observational before-and-after study of adult ICU patients admitted to a single community hospital ICU before (October 2016–May 2017) and after (June 2017–November 2017) the transition to a high-intensity ICU staffing model. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS), and unit composition characteristics including type (e.g., medical, surgical) and purpose (ICU-specific intervention vs close monitoring only) of admission. RESULTS: For the primary outcome, 1,219 subjects were included (779 low-intensity, 440 high-intensity). In multivariable analysis, the transition to a high-intensity staffing model was not associated with a decrease in 30-day (odds ratio [OR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.61–1.34; p = 0.62) or in-hospital (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.57–1.38; p = 0.60) mortality, nor ICU LOS. However, the proportion of patients admitted to the ICU without an ICU-specific need did decrease under the high-intensity staffing model (27.2% low-intensity to 17.5% high-intensity; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Multivariable analysis showed no association between transition to a high-intensity ICU staffing model and mortality or LOS outcomes; however, the proportion of patients admitted without an ICU-specific need decreased under the high-intensity model. Further research is needed to determine whether a high-intensity staffing model may lead to more efficient ICU bed usage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9904765 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99047652023-02-09 Patient Outcomes and Unit Composition With Transition to a High-Intensity ICU Staffing Model: A Before-and-After Study Proper, Jennifer L. Wacker, David A. Shaker, Salma Heisdorffer, Jamie Shaker, Rami M. Shiue, Larissa T. Pendleton, Kathryn M. Siegel, Lianne K. Reilkoff, Ronald A. Crit Care Explor Observational Study Provider staffing models for ICUs are generally based on pragmatic necessities and historical norms at individual institutions. A better understanding of the role that provider staffing models play in determining patient outcomes and optimizing use of ICU resources is needed. OBJECTIVES: To explore the impact of transitioning from a low- to high-intensity intensivist staffing model on patient outcomes and unit composition. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a prospective observational before-and-after study of adult ICU patients admitted to a single community hospital ICU before (October 2016–May 2017) and after (June 2017–November 2017) the transition to a high-intensity ICU staffing model. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS), and unit composition characteristics including type (e.g., medical, surgical) and purpose (ICU-specific intervention vs close monitoring only) of admission. RESULTS: For the primary outcome, 1,219 subjects were included (779 low-intensity, 440 high-intensity). In multivariable analysis, the transition to a high-intensity staffing model was not associated with a decrease in 30-day (odds ratio [OR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.61–1.34; p = 0.62) or in-hospital (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.57–1.38; p = 0.60) mortality, nor ICU LOS. However, the proportion of patients admitted to the ICU without an ICU-specific need did decrease under the high-intensity staffing model (27.2% low-intensity to 17.5% high-intensity; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Multivariable analysis showed no association between transition to a high-intensity ICU staffing model and mortality or LOS outcomes; however, the proportion of patients admitted without an ICU-specific need decreased under the high-intensity model. Further research is needed to determine whether a high-intensity staffing model may lead to more efficient ICU bed usage. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9904765/ /pubmed/36778910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000864 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Observational Study Proper, Jennifer L. Wacker, David A. Shaker, Salma Heisdorffer, Jamie Shaker, Rami M. Shiue, Larissa T. Pendleton, Kathryn M. Siegel, Lianne K. Reilkoff, Ronald A. Patient Outcomes and Unit Composition With Transition to a High-Intensity ICU Staffing Model: A Before-and-After Study |
title | Patient Outcomes and Unit Composition With Transition to a High-Intensity ICU Staffing Model: A Before-and-After Study |
title_full | Patient Outcomes and Unit Composition With Transition to a High-Intensity ICU Staffing Model: A Before-and-After Study |
title_fullStr | Patient Outcomes and Unit Composition With Transition to a High-Intensity ICU Staffing Model: A Before-and-After Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient Outcomes and Unit Composition With Transition to a High-Intensity ICU Staffing Model: A Before-and-After Study |
title_short | Patient Outcomes and Unit Composition With Transition to a High-Intensity ICU Staffing Model: A Before-and-After Study |
title_sort | patient outcomes and unit composition with transition to a high-intensity icu staffing model: a before-and-after study |
topic | Observational Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9904765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36778910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000864 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT properjenniferl patientoutcomesandunitcompositionwithtransitiontoahighintensityicustaffingmodelabeforeandafterstudy AT wackerdavida patientoutcomesandunitcompositionwithtransitiontoahighintensityicustaffingmodelabeforeandafterstudy AT shakersalma patientoutcomesandunitcompositionwithtransitiontoahighintensityicustaffingmodelabeforeandafterstudy AT heisdorfferjamie patientoutcomesandunitcompositionwithtransitiontoahighintensityicustaffingmodelabeforeandafterstudy AT shakerramim patientoutcomesandunitcompositionwithtransitiontoahighintensityicustaffingmodelabeforeandafterstudy AT shiuelarissat patientoutcomesandunitcompositionwithtransitiontoahighintensityicustaffingmodelabeforeandafterstudy AT pendletonkathrynm patientoutcomesandunitcompositionwithtransitiontoahighintensityicustaffingmodelabeforeandafterstudy AT siegelliannek patientoutcomesandunitcompositionwithtransitiontoahighintensityicustaffingmodelabeforeandafterstudy AT reilkoffronalda patientoutcomesandunitcompositionwithtransitiontoahighintensityicustaffingmodelabeforeandafterstudy |