Cargando…

Patient Outcomes and Unit Composition With Transition to a High-Intensity ICU Staffing Model: A Before-and-After Study

Provider staffing models for ICUs are generally based on pragmatic necessities and historical norms at individual institutions. A better understanding of the role that provider staffing models play in determining patient outcomes and optimizing use of ICU resources is needed. OBJECTIVES: To explore...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Proper, Jennifer L., Wacker, David A., Shaker, Salma, Heisdorffer, Jamie, Shaker, Rami M., Shiue, Larissa T., Pendleton, Kathryn M., Siegel, Lianne K., Reilkoff, Ronald A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9904765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36778910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000864
_version_ 1784883686972325888
author Proper, Jennifer L.
Wacker, David A.
Shaker, Salma
Heisdorffer, Jamie
Shaker, Rami M.
Shiue, Larissa T.
Pendleton, Kathryn M.
Siegel, Lianne K.
Reilkoff, Ronald A.
author_facet Proper, Jennifer L.
Wacker, David A.
Shaker, Salma
Heisdorffer, Jamie
Shaker, Rami M.
Shiue, Larissa T.
Pendleton, Kathryn M.
Siegel, Lianne K.
Reilkoff, Ronald A.
author_sort Proper, Jennifer L.
collection PubMed
description Provider staffing models for ICUs are generally based on pragmatic necessities and historical norms at individual institutions. A better understanding of the role that provider staffing models play in determining patient outcomes and optimizing use of ICU resources is needed. OBJECTIVES: To explore the impact of transitioning from a low- to high-intensity intensivist staffing model on patient outcomes and unit composition. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a prospective observational before-and-after study of adult ICU patients admitted to a single community hospital ICU before (October 2016–May 2017) and after (June 2017–November 2017) the transition to a high-intensity ICU staffing model. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS), and unit composition characteristics including type (e.g., medical, surgical) and purpose (ICU-specific intervention vs close monitoring only) of admission. RESULTS: For the primary outcome, 1,219 subjects were included (779 low-intensity, 440 high-intensity). In multivariable analysis, the transition to a high-intensity staffing model was not associated with a decrease in 30-day (odds ratio [OR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.61–1.34; p = 0.62) or in-hospital (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.57–1.38; p = 0.60) mortality, nor ICU LOS. However, the proportion of patients admitted to the ICU without an ICU-specific need did decrease under the high-intensity staffing model (27.2% low-intensity to 17.5% high-intensity; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Multivariable analysis showed no association between transition to a high-intensity ICU staffing model and mortality or LOS outcomes; however, the proportion of patients admitted without an ICU-specific need decreased under the high-intensity model. Further research is needed to determine whether a high-intensity staffing model may lead to more efficient ICU bed usage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9904765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99047652023-02-09 Patient Outcomes and Unit Composition With Transition to a High-Intensity ICU Staffing Model: A Before-and-After Study Proper, Jennifer L. Wacker, David A. Shaker, Salma Heisdorffer, Jamie Shaker, Rami M. Shiue, Larissa T. Pendleton, Kathryn M. Siegel, Lianne K. Reilkoff, Ronald A. Crit Care Explor Observational Study Provider staffing models for ICUs are generally based on pragmatic necessities and historical norms at individual institutions. A better understanding of the role that provider staffing models play in determining patient outcomes and optimizing use of ICU resources is needed. OBJECTIVES: To explore the impact of transitioning from a low- to high-intensity intensivist staffing model on patient outcomes and unit composition. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a prospective observational before-and-after study of adult ICU patients admitted to a single community hospital ICU before (October 2016–May 2017) and after (June 2017–November 2017) the transition to a high-intensity ICU staffing model. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS), and unit composition characteristics including type (e.g., medical, surgical) and purpose (ICU-specific intervention vs close monitoring only) of admission. RESULTS: For the primary outcome, 1,219 subjects were included (779 low-intensity, 440 high-intensity). In multivariable analysis, the transition to a high-intensity staffing model was not associated with a decrease in 30-day (odds ratio [OR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.61–1.34; p = 0.62) or in-hospital (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.57–1.38; p = 0.60) mortality, nor ICU LOS. However, the proportion of patients admitted to the ICU without an ICU-specific need did decrease under the high-intensity staffing model (27.2% low-intensity to 17.5% high-intensity; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Multivariable analysis showed no association between transition to a high-intensity ICU staffing model and mortality or LOS outcomes; however, the proportion of patients admitted without an ICU-specific need decreased under the high-intensity model. Further research is needed to determine whether a high-intensity staffing model may lead to more efficient ICU bed usage. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9904765/ /pubmed/36778910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000864 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Observational Study
Proper, Jennifer L.
Wacker, David A.
Shaker, Salma
Heisdorffer, Jamie
Shaker, Rami M.
Shiue, Larissa T.
Pendleton, Kathryn M.
Siegel, Lianne K.
Reilkoff, Ronald A.
Patient Outcomes and Unit Composition With Transition to a High-Intensity ICU Staffing Model: A Before-and-After Study
title Patient Outcomes and Unit Composition With Transition to a High-Intensity ICU Staffing Model: A Before-and-After Study
title_full Patient Outcomes and Unit Composition With Transition to a High-Intensity ICU Staffing Model: A Before-and-After Study
title_fullStr Patient Outcomes and Unit Composition With Transition to a High-Intensity ICU Staffing Model: A Before-and-After Study
title_full_unstemmed Patient Outcomes and Unit Composition With Transition to a High-Intensity ICU Staffing Model: A Before-and-After Study
title_short Patient Outcomes and Unit Composition With Transition to a High-Intensity ICU Staffing Model: A Before-and-After Study
title_sort patient outcomes and unit composition with transition to a high-intensity icu staffing model: a before-and-after study
topic Observational Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9904765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36778910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000864
work_keys_str_mv AT properjenniferl patientoutcomesandunitcompositionwithtransitiontoahighintensityicustaffingmodelabeforeandafterstudy
AT wackerdavida patientoutcomesandunitcompositionwithtransitiontoahighintensityicustaffingmodelabeforeandafterstudy
AT shakersalma patientoutcomesandunitcompositionwithtransitiontoahighintensityicustaffingmodelabeforeandafterstudy
AT heisdorfferjamie patientoutcomesandunitcompositionwithtransitiontoahighintensityicustaffingmodelabeforeandafterstudy
AT shakerramim patientoutcomesandunitcompositionwithtransitiontoahighintensityicustaffingmodelabeforeandafterstudy
AT shiuelarissat patientoutcomesandunitcompositionwithtransitiontoahighintensityicustaffingmodelabeforeandafterstudy
AT pendletonkathrynm patientoutcomesandunitcompositionwithtransitiontoahighintensityicustaffingmodelabeforeandafterstudy
AT siegelliannek patientoutcomesandunitcompositionwithtransitiontoahighintensityicustaffingmodelabeforeandafterstudy
AT reilkoffronalda patientoutcomesandunitcompositionwithtransitiontoahighintensityicustaffingmodelabeforeandafterstudy