Cargando…

Hospital factors associated with maternal and neonatal outcomes of deliveries to patients with a previous cesarean delivery: an ecological study

BACKGROUND: Recommendations for deliveries of pregnant patients with a previous cesarean delivery and the type of hospitals deemed safe for these deliveries have evolved in recent years, although no studies have examined hospital factors and associated safety. We sought to evaluate maternal and neon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joseph, K.S., Young, Carmen B., Muraca, Giulia M., Boutin, Amélie, Razaz, Neda, John, Sid, Lisonkova, Sarka, Wilson, R. Douglas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: CMA Impact Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9904811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36746486
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.220928
_version_ 1784883698647171072
author Joseph, K.S.
Young, Carmen B.
Muraca, Giulia M.
Boutin, Amélie
Razaz, Neda
John, Sid
Lisonkova, Sarka
Wilson, R. Douglas
author_facet Joseph, K.S.
Young, Carmen B.
Muraca, Giulia M.
Boutin, Amélie
Razaz, Neda
John, Sid
Lisonkova, Sarka
Wilson, R. Douglas
author_sort Joseph, K.S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recommendations for deliveries of pregnant patients with a previous cesarean delivery and the type of hospitals deemed safe for these deliveries have evolved in recent years, although no studies have examined hospital factors and associated safety. We sought to evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes among patients with a previous cesarean delivery by hospital tier and volume. METHODS: We carried out an ecological study of singleton live births delivered at term gestation to patients with a previous cesarean delivery in all Canadian hospitals (excluding Quebec), 2013–2019. We obtained data from the Discharge Abstract Database of the Canadian Institute for Health Information. The primary outcomes were severe maternal morbidity or mortality (SMMM), and serious neonatal morbidity or mortality (SNMM). We used regression modelling to examine hospital tier (tier 4 hospitals being those that provide the highest level of care) and volume; we also identified hospitals with high rates of SMMM and SNMM using within-tier comparisons and comparisons with the overall rate. RESULTS: We included 235 442 deliveries to patients with a previous cesarean delivery; SMMM and SNMM rates were 14.6 per 1000 deliveries and 4.6 per 1000 live births, respectively. Among patients with a parity of 1, SMMM rates were lower in tier 1 hospitals (adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52–0.89) and higher in tier 4 hospitals (adjusted IRR 1.41, 95% CI 1.05–1.91) than in tier 2 hospitals; SNMM rates did not differ by hospital tier. Rates of SNMM increased with increasing hospital volume (adjusted IRR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00–1.04) and increasing rates of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (adjusted IRR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01–1.04). Most hospitals had relatively low SMMM and SNMM rates, although a few hospitals in each tier and volume category had significantly higher rates than others. INTERPRETATION: Adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes among patients with a previous cesarean delivery showed no clear pattern of decreasing SMMM and SNMM with increasing tiers of service and hospital volume. All hospitals, irrespective of tier or size, should continually review their rates of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9904811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher CMA Impact Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99048112023-02-09 Hospital factors associated with maternal and neonatal outcomes of deliveries to patients with a previous cesarean delivery: an ecological study Joseph, K.S. Young, Carmen B. Muraca, Giulia M. Boutin, Amélie Razaz, Neda John, Sid Lisonkova, Sarka Wilson, R. Douglas CMAJ Research BACKGROUND: Recommendations for deliveries of pregnant patients with a previous cesarean delivery and the type of hospitals deemed safe for these deliveries have evolved in recent years, although no studies have examined hospital factors and associated safety. We sought to evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes among patients with a previous cesarean delivery by hospital tier and volume. METHODS: We carried out an ecological study of singleton live births delivered at term gestation to patients with a previous cesarean delivery in all Canadian hospitals (excluding Quebec), 2013–2019. We obtained data from the Discharge Abstract Database of the Canadian Institute for Health Information. The primary outcomes were severe maternal morbidity or mortality (SMMM), and serious neonatal morbidity or mortality (SNMM). We used regression modelling to examine hospital tier (tier 4 hospitals being those that provide the highest level of care) and volume; we also identified hospitals with high rates of SMMM and SNMM using within-tier comparisons and comparisons with the overall rate. RESULTS: We included 235 442 deliveries to patients with a previous cesarean delivery; SMMM and SNMM rates were 14.6 per 1000 deliveries and 4.6 per 1000 live births, respectively. Among patients with a parity of 1, SMMM rates were lower in tier 1 hospitals (adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52–0.89) and higher in tier 4 hospitals (adjusted IRR 1.41, 95% CI 1.05–1.91) than in tier 2 hospitals; SNMM rates did not differ by hospital tier. Rates of SNMM increased with increasing hospital volume (adjusted IRR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00–1.04) and increasing rates of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (adjusted IRR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01–1.04). Most hospitals had relatively low SMMM and SNMM rates, although a few hospitals in each tier and volume category had significantly higher rates than others. INTERPRETATION: Adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes among patients with a previous cesarean delivery showed no clear pattern of decreasing SMMM and SNMM with increasing tiers of service and hospital volume. All hospitals, irrespective of tier or size, should continually review their rates of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. CMA Impact Inc. 2023-02-06 2023-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9904811/ /pubmed/36746486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.220928 Text en © 2023 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Research
Joseph, K.S.
Young, Carmen B.
Muraca, Giulia M.
Boutin, Amélie
Razaz, Neda
John, Sid
Lisonkova, Sarka
Wilson, R. Douglas
Hospital factors associated with maternal and neonatal outcomes of deliveries to patients with a previous cesarean delivery: an ecological study
title Hospital factors associated with maternal and neonatal outcomes of deliveries to patients with a previous cesarean delivery: an ecological study
title_full Hospital factors associated with maternal and neonatal outcomes of deliveries to patients with a previous cesarean delivery: an ecological study
title_fullStr Hospital factors associated with maternal and neonatal outcomes of deliveries to patients with a previous cesarean delivery: an ecological study
title_full_unstemmed Hospital factors associated with maternal and neonatal outcomes of deliveries to patients with a previous cesarean delivery: an ecological study
title_short Hospital factors associated with maternal and neonatal outcomes of deliveries to patients with a previous cesarean delivery: an ecological study
title_sort hospital factors associated with maternal and neonatal outcomes of deliveries to patients with a previous cesarean delivery: an ecological study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9904811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36746486
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.220928
work_keys_str_mv AT josephks hospitalfactorsassociatedwithmaternalandneonataloutcomesofdeliveriestopatientswithapreviouscesareandeliveryanecologicalstudy
AT youngcarmenb hospitalfactorsassociatedwithmaternalandneonataloutcomesofdeliveriestopatientswithapreviouscesareandeliveryanecologicalstudy
AT muracagiuliam hospitalfactorsassociatedwithmaternalandneonataloutcomesofdeliveriestopatientswithapreviouscesareandeliveryanecologicalstudy
AT boutinamelie hospitalfactorsassociatedwithmaternalandneonataloutcomesofdeliveriestopatientswithapreviouscesareandeliveryanecologicalstudy
AT razazneda hospitalfactorsassociatedwithmaternalandneonataloutcomesofdeliveriestopatientswithapreviouscesareandeliveryanecologicalstudy
AT johnsid hospitalfactorsassociatedwithmaternalandneonataloutcomesofdeliveriestopatientswithapreviouscesareandeliveryanecologicalstudy
AT lisonkovasarka hospitalfactorsassociatedwithmaternalandneonataloutcomesofdeliveriestopatientswithapreviouscesareandeliveryanecologicalstudy
AT wilsonrdouglas hospitalfactorsassociatedwithmaternalandneonataloutcomesofdeliveriestopatientswithapreviouscesareandeliveryanecologicalstudy