Cargando…

Systemic photobiomodulation in nursing professionals with chronic low back pain

INTRODUCTION: Chronic low back pain is a frequent complaint at health care services, leading to absenteeism and high treatment costs. Photobiomodulation is a cost-effective, non-pharmacological treatment option. OBJECTIVES: To assess the cost of systemic photobiomodulation in nursing professionals w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Inocêncio, Thais da Silva Capello, Andraus, Rodrigo Antônio Carvalho, Ferrari, Rosângela Aparecida Pimenta, Nogueira, Danielly Negrão Guassu, Tokushima, Tatiane, Cardelli, Alexandrina Aparecida Maciel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho (ANAMT) 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9904826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36793462
http://dx.doi.org/10.47626/1679-4435-2022-736
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Chronic low back pain is a frequent complaint at health care services, leading to absenteeism and high treatment costs. Photobiomodulation is a cost-effective, non-pharmacological treatment option. OBJECTIVES: To assess the cost of systemic photobiomodulation in nursing professionals with chronic low back pain. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional analytical study that analyzed the absorption costing of systemic photobiomodulation in chronic low back pain and was performed in a large university hospital with 20 nursing professionals. Ten systemic photobiomodulation sessions were performed using MM Optics(®) laser equipment at 660 nm wavelength, 100 mW power, 33 J/cm(2) dose, for 30 minutes on the left radial artery. Direct (supplies and direct labor costs) and indirect costs (equipment and infrastructure) were measured. RESULTS: The mean cost of photobiomodulation was R$ 25.30 ± 0.50, and the mean duration was 1,890 seconds ± 55.0. Regarding the first, fifth, and tenth sessions, labor costs were the highest (66%), followed by infrastructure (22%), supplies (9%), and the laser equipment, which presented the lowest cost (2.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Systemic photobiomodulation was shown to be a low-cost therapy when compared to other therapies. The laser equipment represented the lowest cost in the general composition.