Cargando…
Development and psychometric testing of a clinical reasoning rubric based on the nursing process
BACKGROUND: To facilitate the development of clinical reasoning skills in nursing students, educators must possess the ability to teach and evaluate them. This study aimed to describe the development and validation process of an analytic rubric of clinical reasoning skills based on the nursing proce...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9904873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36750822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04060-3 |
_version_ | 1784883713621884928 |
---|---|
author | Ramazanzadeh, Nargess Ghahramanian, Akram Zamanzadeh, Vahid Valizadeh, Leila Ghaffarifar, Saeideh |
author_facet | Ramazanzadeh, Nargess Ghahramanian, Akram Zamanzadeh, Vahid Valizadeh, Leila Ghaffarifar, Saeideh |
author_sort | Ramazanzadeh, Nargess |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To facilitate the development of clinical reasoning skills in nursing students, educators must possess the ability to teach and evaluate them. This study aimed to describe the development and validation process of an analytic rubric of clinical reasoning skills based on the nursing process in undergraduate nursing students. METHODS: A seven-step method was used for rubric development. The initial validation process of the rubric of clinical reasoning was performed with the participation of key stakeholders to assess its face and content validity as well as applicability in the classroom and bedside. An initial pilot test was performed based on scenario-based examinations in the nursing process training course so that convergent validity was used to show how closely the new scale is related to the previous measure for evaluating students’ tasks. Internal consistency and inter-rater correlation coefficient measurement for reliability were assessed. RESULTS: The rubric to assess clinical reasoning skills was developed into eight categories according to the five stages of the nursing process. Content and face validity of the rubric were done qualitatively and resulted in a clear, simple rubric relevant to clinical reasoning skills assessment. The convergent validity was confirmed by the conventional method. The reliability was approved by a high inter-rater correlation coefficient based on the assessment by two random independent raters. CONCLUSION: The clinical reasoning meta-rubric developed in this study meets the purpose of the study. This analytical rubric can be applied to guide teaching and learning as well as evaluate clinical reasoning based on the findings. Testing the applicability confirmed its validity and reliability for assessing clinical reasoning skills in nursing process education during the undergraduate nursing program. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04060-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9904873 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99048732023-02-08 Development and psychometric testing of a clinical reasoning rubric based on the nursing process Ramazanzadeh, Nargess Ghahramanian, Akram Zamanzadeh, Vahid Valizadeh, Leila Ghaffarifar, Saeideh BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: To facilitate the development of clinical reasoning skills in nursing students, educators must possess the ability to teach and evaluate them. This study aimed to describe the development and validation process of an analytic rubric of clinical reasoning skills based on the nursing process in undergraduate nursing students. METHODS: A seven-step method was used for rubric development. The initial validation process of the rubric of clinical reasoning was performed with the participation of key stakeholders to assess its face and content validity as well as applicability in the classroom and bedside. An initial pilot test was performed based on scenario-based examinations in the nursing process training course so that convergent validity was used to show how closely the new scale is related to the previous measure for evaluating students’ tasks. Internal consistency and inter-rater correlation coefficient measurement for reliability were assessed. RESULTS: The rubric to assess clinical reasoning skills was developed into eight categories according to the five stages of the nursing process. Content and face validity of the rubric were done qualitatively and resulted in a clear, simple rubric relevant to clinical reasoning skills assessment. The convergent validity was confirmed by the conventional method. The reliability was approved by a high inter-rater correlation coefficient based on the assessment by two random independent raters. CONCLUSION: The clinical reasoning meta-rubric developed in this study meets the purpose of the study. This analytical rubric can be applied to guide teaching and learning as well as evaluate clinical reasoning based on the findings. Testing the applicability confirmed its validity and reliability for assessing clinical reasoning skills in nursing process education during the undergraduate nursing program. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04060-3. BioMed Central 2023-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9904873/ /pubmed/36750822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04060-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Ramazanzadeh, Nargess Ghahramanian, Akram Zamanzadeh, Vahid Valizadeh, Leila Ghaffarifar, Saeideh Development and psychometric testing of a clinical reasoning rubric based on the nursing process |
title | Development and psychometric testing of a clinical reasoning rubric based on the nursing process |
title_full | Development and psychometric testing of a clinical reasoning rubric based on the nursing process |
title_fullStr | Development and psychometric testing of a clinical reasoning rubric based on the nursing process |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and psychometric testing of a clinical reasoning rubric based on the nursing process |
title_short | Development and psychometric testing of a clinical reasoning rubric based on the nursing process |
title_sort | development and psychometric testing of a clinical reasoning rubric based on the nursing process |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9904873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36750822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04060-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramazanzadehnargess developmentandpsychometrictestingofaclinicalreasoningrubricbasedonthenursingprocess AT ghahramanianakram developmentandpsychometrictestingofaclinicalreasoningrubricbasedonthenursingprocess AT zamanzadehvahid developmentandpsychometrictestingofaclinicalreasoningrubricbasedonthenursingprocess AT valizadehleila developmentandpsychometrictestingofaclinicalreasoningrubricbasedonthenursingprocess AT ghaffarifarsaeideh developmentandpsychometrictestingofaclinicalreasoningrubricbasedonthenursingprocess |