Cargando…
Using machine learning to predict venous thromboembolism and major bleeding events following total joint arthroplasty
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding (MBE) are feared complications that are influenced by numerous host and surgical related factors. Using machine learning on contemporary data, our aim was to develop and validate a practical, easy-to-use algorithm to predict risk for VTE and MBE follow...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9905066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36750656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26032-1 |
_version_ | 1784883752751595520 |
---|---|
author | Shohat, Noam Ludwick, Leanne Sherman, Matthew B. Fillingham, Yale Parvizi, Javad |
author_facet | Shohat, Noam Ludwick, Leanne Sherman, Matthew B. Fillingham, Yale Parvizi, Javad |
author_sort | Shohat, Noam |
collection | PubMed |
description | Venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding (MBE) are feared complications that are influenced by numerous host and surgical related factors. Using machine learning on contemporary data, our aim was to develop and validate a practical, easy-to-use algorithm to predict risk for VTE and MBE following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). This was a single institutional study of 35,963 primary and revision total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients operated between 2009 and 2020. Fifty-six variables related to demographics, comorbidities, operative factors as well as chemoprophylaxis were included in the analysis. The cohort was divided to training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Four machine learning models were developed for each of the outcomes assessed (VTE and MBE). Models were created for all VTE grouped together as well as for pulmonary emboli (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) individually to examine the need for distinct algorithms. For each outcome, the model that best performed using repeated cross validation was chosen for algorithm development, and predicted versus observed incidences were evaluated. Of the 35,963 patients included, 308 (0.86%) developed VTE (170 PE’s, 176 DVT’s) and 293 (0.81%) developed MBE. Separate models were created for PE and DVT as they were found to outperform the prediction of VTE. Gradient boosting trees had the highest performance for both PE (AUC-ROC 0.774 [SD 0.055]) and DVT (AUC-ROC 0.759 [SD 0.039]). For MBE, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) analysis had the highest AUC (AUC-ROC 0.803 [SD 0.035]). An algorithm that provides the probability for PE, DVT and MBE for each specific patient was created. All 3 algorithms had good discriminatory capability and cross-validation showed similar probabilities comparing predicted and observed failures indicating high accuracy of the model. We successfully developed and validated an easy-to-use algorithm that accurately predicts VTE and MBE following TJA. This tool can be used in every-day clinical decision making and patient counseling. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9905066 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99050662023-02-08 Using machine learning to predict venous thromboembolism and major bleeding events following total joint arthroplasty Shohat, Noam Ludwick, Leanne Sherman, Matthew B. Fillingham, Yale Parvizi, Javad Sci Rep Article Venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding (MBE) are feared complications that are influenced by numerous host and surgical related factors. Using machine learning on contemporary data, our aim was to develop and validate a practical, easy-to-use algorithm to predict risk for VTE and MBE following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). This was a single institutional study of 35,963 primary and revision total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients operated between 2009 and 2020. Fifty-six variables related to demographics, comorbidities, operative factors as well as chemoprophylaxis were included in the analysis. The cohort was divided to training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Four machine learning models were developed for each of the outcomes assessed (VTE and MBE). Models were created for all VTE grouped together as well as for pulmonary emboli (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) individually to examine the need for distinct algorithms. For each outcome, the model that best performed using repeated cross validation was chosen for algorithm development, and predicted versus observed incidences were evaluated. Of the 35,963 patients included, 308 (0.86%) developed VTE (170 PE’s, 176 DVT’s) and 293 (0.81%) developed MBE. Separate models were created for PE and DVT as they were found to outperform the prediction of VTE. Gradient boosting trees had the highest performance for both PE (AUC-ROC 0.774 [SD 0.055]) and DVT (AUC-ROC 0.759 [SD 0.039]). For MBE, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) analysis had the highest AUC (AUC-ROC 0.803 [SD 0.035]). An algorithm that provides the probability for PE, DVT and MBE for each specific patient was created. All 3 algorithms had good discriminatory capability and cross-validation showed similar probabilities comparing predicted and observed failures indicating high accuracy of the model. We successfully developed and validated an easy-to-use algorithm that accurately predicts VTE and MBE following TJA. This tool can be used in every-day clinical decision making and patient counseling. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9905066/ /pubmed/36750656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26032-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Shohat, Noam Ludwick, Leanne Sherman, Matthew B. Fillingham, Yale Parvizi, Javad Using machine learning to predict venous thromboembolism and major bleeding events following total joint arthroplasty |
title | Using machine learning to predict venous thromboembolism and major bleeding events following total joint arthroplasty |
title_full | Using machine learning to predict venous thromboembolism and major bleeding events following total joint arthroplasty |
title_fullStr | Using machine learning to predict venous thromboembolism and major bleeding events following total joint arthroplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | Using machine learning to predict venous thromboembolism and major bleeding events following total joint arthroplasty |
title_short | Using machine learning to predict venous thromboembolism and major bleeding events following total joint arthroplasty |
title_sort | using machine learning to predict venous thromboembolism and major bleeding events following total joint arthroplasty |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9905066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36750656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26032-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shohatnoam usingmachinelearningtopredictvenousthromboembolismandmajorbleedingeventsfollowingtotaljointarthroplasty AT ludwickleanne usingmachinelearningtopredictvenousthromboembolismandmajorbleedingeventsfollowingtotaljointarthroplasty AT shermanmatthewb usingmachinelearningtopredictvenousthromboembolismandmajorbleedingeventsfollowingtotaljointarthroplasty AT fillinghamyale usingmachinelearningtopredictvenousthromboembolismandmajorbleedingeventsfollowingtotaljointarthroplasty AT parvizijavad usingmachinelearningtopredictvenousthromboembolismandmajorbleedingeventsfollowingtotaljointarthroplasty |