Cargando…

Impacto clínico de no aplicar el protocolo ERAS en los pacientes sometidos a cistectomía durante la pandemia COVID-19

INTRODUCTION: During the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in our center, neither prehabilitation nor multimodal rehabilitation could be applied due to the excessive patient load on the health system and to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission. The objective of our study was to analyze the evolution, com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Castellarnau, S., Gaya, J.M., Espinosa, J., Sierra, P., Huguet, J., Palou, J., Hernando, D., Sabaté, S., Breda, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AEU. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9905094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36776227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acuro.2023.01.005
_version_ 1784883758283882496
author Castellarnau, S.
Gaya, J.M.
Espinosa, J.
Sierra, P.
Huguet, J.
Palou, J.
Hernando, D.
Sabaté, S.
Breda, A.
author_facet Castellarnau, S.
Gaya, J.M.
Espinosa, J.
Sierra, P.
Huguet, J.
Palou, J.
Hernando, D.
Sabaté, S.
Breda, A.
author_sort Castellarnau, S.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: During the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in our center, neither prehabilitation nor multimodal rehabilitation could be applied due to the excessive patient load on the health system and to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission. The objective of our study was to analyze the evolution, complications, and survival up to one year of patients who underwent radical cystectomy in our hospital from March 1(st) to May 31(st), 2020 (period of the first wave COVID-19 pandemic in Spain). We also compared the results with cystectomized patients outside the pandemic period and with application of the ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocol. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients scheduled for radical cystectomy from March 1(st),2020 to May 31(st), 2020. They were matched with previously operated patients using a 1:2 propensity matching score. The matching variables were demographic data, preoperative and intraoperative clinical conditions. RESULTS: A total of 23 radical cystectomies with urinary diversion were performed in the period described. In none of the cases the prehabilitation or the follow-up of our ERAS protocol could be applied, and this was the only difference we found between the 2 groups. Although the minimally invasive approach was more frequent in the pandemic group, the difference was not statistically significant. Three patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 during their admission, presenting severe respiratory complications and high in-hospital mortality. Apart from respiratory complications secondary to SARS-CoV-2, we also found statistically significant differences in other postoperative complications. The hospital stay increased by 3 days in the pandemic group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent radical cystectomy at our center during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic had a higher number and severity of respiratory and non-respiratory complications. Discontinuation of the ERAS protocol was the main difference in treatment between groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9905094
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AEU. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99050942023-02-08 Impacto clínico de no aplicar el protocolo ERAS en los pacientes sometidos a cistectomía durante la pandemia COVID-19 Castellarnau, S. Gaya, J.M. Espinosa, J. Sierra, P. Huguet, J. Palou, J. Hernando, D. Sabaté, S. Breda, A. Actas Urol Esp Artículo Original INTRODUCTION: During the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in our center, neither prehabilitation nor multimodal rehabilitation could be applied due to the excessive patient load on the health system and to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission. The objective of our study was to analyze the evolution, complications, and survival up to one year of patients who underwent radical cystectomy in our hospital from March 1(st) to May 31(st), 2020 (period of the first wave COVID-19 pandemic in Spain). We also compared the results with cystectomized patients outside the pandemic period and with application of the ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocol. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients scheduled for radical cystectomy from March 1(st),2020 to May 31(st), 2020. They were matched with previously operated patients using a 1:2 propensity matching score. The matching variables were demographic data, preoperative and intraoperative clinical conditions. RESULTS: A total of 23 radical cystectomies with urinary diversion were performed in the period described. In none of the cases the prehabilitation or the follow-up of our ERAS protocol could be applied, and this was the only difference we found between the 2 groups. Although the minimally invasive approach was more frequent in the pandemic group, the difference was not statistically significant. Three patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 during their admission, presenting severe respiratory complications and high in-hospital mortality. Apart from respiratory complications secondary to SARS-CoV-2, we also found statistically significant differences in other postoperative complications. The hospital stay increased by 3 days in the pandemic group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent radical cystectomy at our center during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic had a higher number and severity of respiratory and non-respiratory complications. Discontinuation of the ERAS protocol was the main difference in treatment between groups. AEU. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. 2023-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9905094/ /pubmed/36776227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acuro.2023.01.005 Text en © 2023 AEU. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Artículo Original
Castellarnau, S.
Gaya, J.M.
Espinosa, J.
Sierra, P.
Huguet, J.
Palou, J.
Hernando, D.
Sabaté, S.
Breda, A.
Impacto clínico de no aplicar el protocolo ERAS en los pacientes sometidos a cistectomía durante la pandemia COVID-19
title Impacto clínico de no aplicar el protocolo ERAS en los pacientes sometidos a cistectomía durante la pandemia COVID-19
title_full Impacto clínico de no aplicar el protocolo ERAS en los pacientes sometidos a cistectomía durante la pandemia COVID-19
title_fullStr Impacto clínico de no aplicar el protocolo ERAS en los pacientes sometidos a cistectomía durante la pandemia COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Impacto clínico de no aplicar el protocolo ERAS en los pacientes sometidos a cistectomía durante la pandemia COVID-19
title_short Impacto clínico de no aplicar el protocolo ERAS en los pacientes sometidos a cistectomía durante la pandemia COVID-19
title_sort impacto clínico de no aplicar el protocolo eras en los pacientes sometidos a cistectomía durante la pandemia covid-19
topic Artículo Original
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9905094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36776227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acuro.2023.01.005
work_keys_str_mv AT castellarnaus impactoclinicodenoaplicarelprotocoloerasenlospacientessometidosacistectomiadurantelapandemiacovid19
AT gayajm impactoclinicodenoaplicarelprotocoloerasenlospacientessometidosacistectomiadurantelapandemiacovid19
AT espinosaj impactoclinicodenoaplicarelprotocoloerasenlospacientessometidosacistectomiadurantelapandemiacovid19
AT sierrap impactoclinicodenoaplicarelprotocoloerasenlospacientessometidosacistectomiadurantelapandemiacovid19
AT huguetj impactoclinicodenoaplicarelprotocoloerasenlospacientessometidosacistectomiadurantelapandemiacovid19
AT palouj impactoclinicodenoaplicarelprotocoloerasenlospacientessometidosacistectomiadurantelapandemiacovid19
AT hernandod impactoclinicodenoaplicarelprotocoloerasenlospacientessometidosacistectomiadurantelapandemiacovid19
AT sabates impactoclinicodenoaplicarelprotocoloerasenlospacientessometidosacistectomiadurantelapandemiacovid19
AT bredaa impactoclinicodenoaplicarelprotocoloerasenlospacientessometidosacistectomiadurantelapandemiacovid19