Cargando…
Impacto clínico de no aplicar el protocolo ERAS en los pacientes sometidos a cistectomía durante la pandemia COVID-19
INTRODUCTION: During the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in our center, neither prehabilitation nor multimodal rehabilitation could be applied due to the excessive patient load on the health system and to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission. The objective of our study was to analyze the evolution, com...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AEU. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9905094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36776227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acuro.2023.01.005 |
_version_ | 1784883758283882496 |
---|---|
author | Castellarnau, S. Gaya, J.M. Espinosa, J. Sierra, P. Huguet, J. Palou, J. Hernando, D. Sabaté, S. Breda, A. |
author_facet | Castellarnau, S. Gaya, J.M. Espinosa, J. Sierra, P. Huguet, J. Palou, J. Hernando, D. Sabaté, S. Breda, A. |
author_sort | Castellarnau, S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: During the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in our center, neither prehabilitation nor multimodal rehabilitation could be applied due to the excessive patient load on the health system and to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission. The objective of our study was to analyze the evolution, complications, and survival up to one year of patients who underwent radical cystectomy in our hospital from March 1(st) to May 31(st), 2020 (period of the first wave COVID-19 pandemic in Spain). We also compared the results with cystectomized patients outside the pandemic period and with application of the ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocol. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients scheduled for radical cystectomy from March 1(st),2020 to May 31(st), 2020. They were matched with previously operated patients using a 1:2 propensity matching score. The matching variables were demographic data, preoperative and intraoperative clinical conditions. RESULTS: A total of 23 radical cystectomies with urinary diversion were performed in the period described. In none of the cases the prehabilitation or the follow-up of our ERAS protocol could be applied, and this was the only difference we found between the 2 groups. Although the minimally invasive approach was more frequent in the pandemic group, the difference was not statistically significant. Three patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 during their admission, presenting severe respiratory complications and high in-hospital mortality. Apart from respiratory complications secondary to SARS-CoV-2, we also found statistically significant differences in other postoperative complications. The hospital stay increased by 3 days in the pandemic group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent radical cystectomy at our center during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic had a higher number and severity of respiratory and non-respiratory complications. Discontinuation of the ERAS protocol was the main difference in treatment between groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9905094 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | AEU. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99050942023-02-08 Impacto clínico de no aplicar el protocolo ERAS en los pacientes sometidos a cistectomía durante la pandemia COVID-19 Castellarnau, S. Gaya, J.M. Espinosa, J. Sierra, P. Huguet, J. Palou, J. Hernando, D. Sabaté, S. Breda, A. Actas Urol Esp Artículo Original INTRODUCTION: During the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in our center, neither prehabilitation nor multimodal rehabilitation could be applied due to the excessive patient load on the health system and to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission. The objective of our study was to analyze the evolution, complications, and survival up to one year of patients who underwent radical cystectomy in our hospital from March 1(st) to May 31(st), 2020 (period of the first wave COVID-19 pandemic in Spain). We also compared the results with cystectomized patients outside the pandemic period and with application of the ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocol. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients scheduled for radical cystectomy from March 1(st),2020 to May 31(st), 2020. They were matched with previously operated patients using a 1:2 propensity matching score. The matching variables were demographic data, preoperative and intraoperative clinical conditions. RESULTS: A total of 23 radical cystectomies with urinary diversion were performed in the period described. In none of the cases the prehabilitation or the follow-up of our ERAS protocol could be applied, and this was the only difference we found between the 2 groups. Although the minimally invasive approach was more frequent in the pandemic group, the difference was not statistically significant. Three patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 during their admission, presenting severe respiratory complications and high in-hospital mortality. Apart from respiratory complications secondary to SARS-CoV-2, we also found statistically significant differences in other postoperative complications. The hospital stay increased by 3 days in the pandemic group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent radical cystectomy at our center during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic had a higher number and severity of respiratory and non-respiratory complications. Discontinuation of the ERAS protocol was the main difference in treatment between groups. AEU. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. 2023-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9905094/ /pubmed/36776227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acuro.2023.01.005 Text en © 2023 AEU. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Artículo Original Castellarnau, S. Gaya, J.M. Espinosa, J. Sierra, P. Huguet, J. Palou, J. Hernando, D. Sabaté, S. Breda, A. Impacto clínico de no aplicar el protocolo ERAS en los pacientes sometidos a cistectomía durante la pandemia COVID-19 |
title | Impacto clínico de no aplicar el protocolo ERAS en los pacientes sometidos a cistectomía durante la pandemia COVID-19 |
title_full | Impacto clínico de no aplicar el protocolo ERAS en los pacientes sometidos a cistectomía durante la pandemia COVID-19 |
title_fullStr | Impacto clínico de no aplicar el protocolo ERAS en los pacientes sometidos a cistectomía durante la pandemia COVID-19 |
title_full_unstemmed | Impacto clínico de no aplicar el protocolo ERAS en los pacientes sometidos a cistectomía durante la pandemia COVID-19 |
title_short | Impacto clínico de no aplicar el protocolo ERAS en los pacientes sometidos a cistectomía durante la pandemia COVID-19 |
title_sort | impacto clínico de no aplicar el protocolo eras en los pacientes sometidos a cistectomía durante la pandemia covid-19 |
topic | Artículo Original |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9905094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36776227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acuro.2023.01.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT castellarnaus impactoclinicodenoaplicarelprotocoloerasenlospacientessometidosacistectomiadurantelapandemiacovid19 AT gayajm impactoclinicodenoaplicarelprotocoloerasenlospacientessometidosacistectomiadurantelapandemiacovid19 AT espinosaj impactoclinicodenoaplicarelprotocoloerasenlospacientessometidosacistectomiadurantelapandemiacovid19 AT sierrap impactoclinicodenoaplicarelprotocoloerasenlospacientessometidosacistectomiadurantelapandemiacovid19 AT huguetj impactoclinicodenoaplicarelprotocoloerasenlospacientessometidosacistectomiadurantelapandemiacovid19 AT palouj impactoclinicodenoaplicarelprotocoloerasenlospacientessometidosacistectomiadurantelapandemiacovid19 AT hernandod impactoclinicodenoaplicarelprotocoloerasenlospacientessometidosacistectomiadurantelapandemiacovid19 AT sabates impactoclinicodenoaplicarelprotocoloerasenlospacientessometidosacistectomiadurantelapandemiacovid19 AT bredaa impactoclinicodenoaplicarelprotocoloerasenlospacientessometidosacistectomiadurantelapandemiacovid19 |